[Ratzz]

okay.. i did not post last night (to save myself the embarrassment)
but looks like adjustments*might*have worked.. 3-0

if that was a fluke, then i think i am out of gas..
as i would pretty much be out of ideas as to what determines
the outcome of a pro basketball game.

if it was NOT a fluke.. then " the Eagle has landed" is not so far from the truth,
as i can safely begin to augment the stakes of my wagers.

i wish all you guys luck,*

cheers, ®


Precision 1.0 (8-5)

Precision 2.0 (6-3)

Precision 3.0 (0-3) a dismal failure.*i aborted that quickly.

Precision 4.0 (3-6) adjustments clearly did not work,

[Ratzz]

Jan 9th

1) MIA___–4___1ST HALF


2) OKC/DEN ___Over 52___1ST QTR

[WWCD]

Just being curious. Whatever the system is you are making adjustments to, isn't the sample size a bit small? You may have gone 0-3 in one system but hit the next 6 games. Are you keeping track of the results on the other adjusted systems as well?

[Ratzz]

Just being curious. Whatever the system is you are making adjustments to, isn't the sample size a bit small? You may have gone 0-3 in one system but hit the next 6 games. Are you keeping track of the results on the other adjusted systems as well?

good question, but i think not. anything that starts 0-3 is not going to get much better..

but let's see tonite... picks are above*

[JAnthony]

good question, but i think not. anything that starts 0-3 is not going to get much better..

but let's see tonite... picks are above*

And that's not true at all. Look at Grinder's chase system, it started out also pretty poorly with some double digit unit deficit, but look where he's now - up 80+ units. If you thing that you are going to develop something that will never lose, you are being a bit naive, to say the least.

[Ratzz]

And that's not true at all. Look at Grinder's chase system, it started out also pretty poorly with some double digit unit deficit, but look where he's now - up 80+ units. If you thing that you are going to develop something that will never lose, you are being a bit naive, to say the least.

hey, i dig that, but i can't chase..

chasing is wayyyyyyy too stressful... first chase is whatevs.. and the second chase is uncomfortable.. by the third chase, you are not having fun at all if you are behind..

i would rather spend time and try to come up with a high percentage system play (which i think i may have done)..

it went 3-0 last night but undocumented.. so 0-0 so far..
plays are above*(MIA –4 1H, and OKC/DEN OVER 52 1Q)

let's see if i am chasing shadows, or actually created a money maker

[Ratzz]

looking better... hope next one starts fast! (lots of scoring)

[boydako13]

Nice one!!

[No coincidences]

You got a great number on that 1Q over. I didn't see anything lower than a 52.5, and it closed at 53 (which of course is where it ended up).

[Ratzz]

You got a great number on that 1Q over. I didn't see anything lower than a 52.5, and it closed at 53 (which of course is where it ended up).

Hi Dr. No... how are you?*

i got that one in early in the day, before 10AM, maybe went up
i might go 1H next time.. covered easier (58 pts scored in 2nd Qtr)*

but all good

[Ratzz]

Jan 9th

1) MIA___–4___1ST HALF *(W)


2) OKC/DEN ___Over 52___1ST QTR (W)*

Precision 5.0 looking good so far 2-0

tell the books to*run... a big-ass nerd is coming!!

[Ratzz]

Nice one!!

thanks Boy!

hope it continues, cheers!

[Ratzz]

2-0 officially in this thread.. but for the test run personally, it is 5-0..
on wed. it went 3-0..

getting psyched about this..

i like 1Q and 3Q action as well

[Ratzz]

re-type

[Ratzz]

Jan 10th

3) IND___–3___1ST QTR (over Was.)*

[Ratzz]

Jan 10th

4) MIA___–1.5___1ST QTR (over the Nets)

[Ratzz]

Jan 10th

5) MIA/BKN___OVER 49___1ST QTR

[Ratzz]

Jan 10th

6) IND___–1.5___3RD QTR

[Ratzz]

Jan 10th

7) BKN___+2.5___3rd QTR (over the HEAT)


8) MIA/BKN___UNDER 48.5___3rd QTR

[Ratzz]

Jan 10th

9) SAC___–2___1ST QTR over Orl.

[jjjune]

Nice run going on

[Ratzz]

Nice run going on

having fun with my system play, getting better at it

cheers, ®

[Ratzz]

Jan 10th

10) SAC___–1___3rd QTR over Orl.

[Allen24]

what do u think about -2.5 SAC for the half

[Ratzz]

prefer 3Q.. hard time reading 2H's

but your call...

[Ratzz]

looking better

[Ratzz]

Jan 10th

3) IND___–3___1ST QTR (over Was.) (L)

4) MIA___–1.5___1ST QTR (over the Nets) (L)

5) MIA/BKN___OVER 49___1ST QTR (W)

6) IND___–1.5___3RD QTR (W)

7) BKN___+2.5___3rd QTR (over the HEAT) (W)

8) MIA/BKN___UNDER 48.5___3rd QTR (W)

9) SAC___–2___1ST QTR over Orl. (L)

10) SAC___–1___3rd QTR over Orl. (W)

okay, feeling better about this version, 3-0 (3rd Qtrs last night)
still learning. I usually terminate experiments after 10 picks.
but let's extend this, see if we can improve on it

Precision 5.0 is 7-3

3-0 in 3Q action

..

[Ratzz]

Jan 11th

11) PHX___pk___1st QTR over Det.

[Ratzz]

go Suns 1Q

[Ratzz]

Jan 11th

12) CHA___pk___3rd QTR over Chicago

[Ratzz]

Jan 11th

13) DAL___–2___3rd QTR over New Orleans

[Ratzz]

Jan 12th

14) CLE___+1___1ST QTR over Sac.

[Ratzz]

Jan 12th

15) ATL___+1.5___1ST QTR over Mem.

[Ratzz]

Jan 12th

16) CLE/SAC__UNDER 51___3RD QTR

[Ratzz]

Jan 11th

11) PHX___pk___1st QTR over Det. (L)


12) CHA___pk___3rd QTR over Chicago (W)


13) DAL___–2___3rd QTR over New Orleans •PUSH•


Jan 12th


14) CLE___+1___1ST QTRover Sac. (W)


15) ATL___+1.5___1ST QTRover Mem. (L)


16) CLE/SAC__UNDER 51___3RD QTR(W)

3-2-1 last two days... still no losses in 3Q's
I usually terminate experiments after 10 picks.
i will run this to 20 picks. and see if i can improve percentage

Precision 5.0*is 10-5-1 **(i was hoping better)

but 4-0*in 3Q action (that's a good %)