1. #1
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    NBA - Wednesday, 4/10/13

    1 NBA Play Wednesday


    Bucks / Magic UNDER 201 -110 (Bookmaker)


    YTD: 190-198-2, -8.20

  2. #2
    RJKing
    RJKing's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-27-12
    Posts: 344
    Betpoints: 3847

    You keep taking the magic to go under.???? You know they suck on defense, you go out of your way to point it out then you constantly take the magic under and you lose.
    Points Awarded:

    1923 gave RJKing 2 SBR Point(s) for this post.

    Nomination(s):
    This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: CaVengo

  3. #3
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by RJKing View Post
    You keep taking the magic to go under.???? You know they suck on defense, you go out of your way to point it out then you constantly take the magic under and you lose.
    Are you going to keep pointing that out every time I take an Orlando Under? Take a look at the last two weeks or so, Magic are trending toward an 'under' team because they can't score but they have actually played better defense since playing all the youngsters. And I think I cashed a Magic Under or two during that time (Spurs game comes to mind, may have been more).

  4. #4
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by RJKing View Post
    You keep taking the magic to go under.???? You know they suck on defense, you go out of your way to point it out then you constantly take the magic under and you lose.
    I am 2-1 with Orlando 'unders' since Alfalo was lost for the season, won vs. Spurs and Thunder, lost vs. Heat.

  5. #5
    Sport_Fish
    Sport_Fish's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-06-10
    Posts: 4,079
    Betpoints: 2039

    u went from -16 units down to now -8....do we start fading you now?

  6. #6
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    I am actually considering adding Magic side. Bucks may limit starters in second of back-to-back, they know they won't catch Boston for 7th.

  7. #7
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by Sport_Fish View Post
    u went from -16 units down to now -8....do we start fading you now?
    More likely to approach 0, winning season still very possible. Remember 4 winning NBA seasons out of 5 at SBR (26 of 37 all sports)

  8. #8
    Sport_Fish
    Sport_Fish's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-06-10
    Posts: 4,079
    Betpoints: 2039

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    More likely to approach 0, winning season still very possible. Remember 4 winning NBA seasons out of 5 at SBR (26 of 37 all sports)
    possible...but its just been a trend a few times i've noticed. Go up, then go down. etc.

    Oh well lets wait n see

    And 4 of 5 winning seasons? So that means by theory you will have 1 winning season out of ur next 5 (50%)...this could be variance kicking in and this year will likely be one of those losing ones?

  9. #9
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by Sport_Fish View Post
    possible...but its just been a trend a few times i've noticed. Go up, then go down. etc.

    Oh well lets wait n see

    And 4 of 5 winning seasons? So that means by theory you will have 1 winning season out of ur next 5 (50%)...this could be variance kicking in and this year will likely be one of those losing ones?
    Gamblers fallacy, regression takes place over infinity, if it were as easy as looking at drop-in-the-bucket periods like 5-year intervals, we would all be rich. That aside, I don't consider myself a 50-50 or coin-flip capper, as 26-of-37 it a truer representation than 4-of-5 NBA or the 0-for-3 so far on current sports. Let's just see how everything plays out.

  10. #10
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    NBA Triple Play

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    1 NBA Play Wednesday


    Bucks / Magic UNDER 201 -110 (Bookmaker)


    YTD: 190-198-2, -8.20
    Adding:

    Magic +4.5 -103 (5 Dimes)
    Nets / Celtics UNDER 191.5 +103 (5 Dimes)


    NBA Card Complete

  11. #11
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Under screwed by OT in Orlando. Now need Magic to cover.

  12. #12
    kobstopa
    kobstopa's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-21-11
    Posts: 2,965
    Betpoints: 3520

    Bucks/magics go OT, the magics could have iced the game with a free threw at end of regulation. But he missed it

  13. #13
    El Sol
    El Sol's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-17-08
    Posts: 876
    Betpoints: 1802

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Gamblers fallacy, regression takes place over infinity, if it were as easy as looking at drop-in-the-bucket periods like 5-year intervals, we would all be rich. That aside, I don't consider myself a 50-50 or coin-flip capper, as 26-of-37 it a truer representation than 4-of-5 NBA or the 0-for-3 so far on current sports. Let's just see how everything plays out.
    Very few people here fully understand what the term 'gamblers fallacy' actually means. I tried to explain this to many gamblers including veterans and they still insist that random events in the past effect random events in the future...

  14. #14
    Bman1991
    Bman1991's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-11-12
    Posts: 34
    Betpoints: 175

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    Under screwed by OT in Orlando. Now need Magic to cover.
    Tobias Harris is a cheater, he shouldn't have shot the three.

  15. #15
    ThaTopMoron
    Body-Bags
    ThaTopMoron's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-30-10
    Posts: 26,554
    Betpoints: 6892

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    1 NBA Play Wednesday


    Bucks / Magic UNDER 201 -110 (Bookmaker)

    YTD: 190-198-2, -8.20

    Bucks / Magic UNDER 201...

    another under busted in the NBA, jeez LT.... what did I tell you?

    Under 191.5 in Boston... YOU JUST LOST IT WITH 8 SECONDS LEFT WITH A MEANINGLESS 3 IN THE CORNER THAT THE NETS DIDN'T EVEN CONTEST....

    what did I tell you about late season unders?

  16. #16
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by ThaTopMoron View Post
    Bucks / Magic UNDER 201...

    another under busted in the NBA, jeez LT.... what did I tell you?

    Under 191.5 in Boston... YOU JUST LOST IT WITH 8 SECONDS LEFT WITH A MEANINGLESS 3 IN THE CORNER THAT THE NETS DIDN'T EVEN CONTEST....

    what did I tell you about late season unders?
    Meh, I could have easily been 3-0 tonight, shit happens. And you are wrong about late season Unders. Since 2007, the Under is 50.9 percent in all regular season games. In APRIL regular season games during that time, it is 52.2 percent.

  17. #17
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    By the way, 'under' is 54.1 percent in playoffs since 2008 (actually 2007-08 season).

Top