This is sort of unsatisfying, actually. Talk about spinning your wheels. Without any additional filters on it, the method told you to play every game, and it eeked out the smallest of profits. Which is mildly impressive, but wildly impractical.
Again, my thought is: this data is good and reliable, but the best way to use it hasn't been determined yet (by me, at least.)
EDGAR LINE vs THE FINAL NUMBER (5% or more difference in team's estimated win %l)
MONEYLINE PLAYS (at 1* each)
Wednesday, 4-9, +0.28u
(MIA, CHA, WAS, IND, PHI, TOR, MIL, ATL, POR, MIN, SEA, LAX, LAC)
YTD 84-151, +18.68u
SAME TEAMS ATS (at 1* each)
Wednesday, 7-6, +0.70u
YTD 124-111 (.527), +7.45u
POWER RATINGS OVER LAST 10 GAMES
1 SAN 77
2 PHX 68
3 HOU 65
4 CHI 63
5 UTH 62
6 WAS 60
7 MIN 60
8 LAX 58
9 DAL 57
10 MIA 54
11 CLE 54
12 DEN 54
13 DET 52
14 POR 49
15 GSW 49
16 IND 49
17 SEA 48
18 BOS 47
19 MIL 46
20 SAC 46
21 LAC 45
22 NJN 45
23 TOR 43
24 NYY 39
25 NOK 39
26 ORL 38
27 ATL 37
28 MEM 35
29 CHA 28
30 PHI 27
EDGAR LINES FOR 12.14.06
(favorite-spread/ML-dog)
CHA 2.6/128 over ORL
SAN 1.9/123 over NOK
GS 1.6/112 over HOU
STRIKE PRICES
(at this ML or better, team is a play both SU and ATS under 5%-OFF method)
ORL +153, CHA -110
SAN -104, NOK +145
HOU +132, GS +104
GL