Yeah... Well for mine I'd like -5knicks because of the back door cover but unlikely. Might reach 6 and I'd buy it down
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
12-13-12 03:54 AM #36
-
12-13-12 05:03 AM #37
smh its lakers +8 or no play i mean its on tnt after the worst loss of the season la may not win but theyre gonna try there hardest too
-
12-13-12 06:36 AM #38
LAL likely going to rebound after the letdown at CLEV, and not because they want D'Antoni to have a nice NYC homecoming.
-
12-13-12 08:08 AM #39
lolololololololol.....Why is it that Laker haters make such ignorant comments all the time. They cant stand when the Lakers win even one game.....ever. It's always an excuse when the Lakers win. Can't ever just say 'nice game, congrats'. They beat Denver by 19!! They won all 4 quarters & never trailed & were never in jeopardy of losing this game. They won every statistical category that had any meaning whatsoever yet u still think the Lakers "should have lost" this game
Originally Posted by blanco
Just like u can't expect the bench to play that well u also cant expect Kobe to score 14 & Pau to score 6 which they did in this game.
Lakers win by 19 & the haters still say they "should have lost" lolololololololol.....doesn't get much more clueless than that.
They also dominated the Mavs by 26 & the haters immediately come w/ the 'yea, but Metta & Meeks shot well'. Meeks was 4-8 lol. Good thing Meeks shot the lights out w/ that 4-8 performance or the Lakers would have lost instead of winning by 26
& Metta's shooting 42% from 3 this year. Even if u take away Metta's 5 three's & give Meeks an 0-8 Lakers still win....lol
Making excuses when a team wins by 26.....lolololololololol. The only thing more delusional than a Laker fan is a Laker hater.
-
12-13-12 08:57 AM #40
Lakers homer much bro. Meeks was 3/5 from 3s that game, MWP 5/7. and jamison had 19 and 15. Originally Posted by upscope
lolololololololol.....Why is it that Laker haters make such ignorant comments all the time. They cant stand when the Lakers win even one game.....ever. It's always an excuse when the Lakers win. Can't ever just say 'nice game, congrats'. They beat Denver by 19!! They won all 4 quarters & never trailed & were never in jeopardy of losing this game. They won every statistical category that had any meaning whatsoever yet u still think the Lakers "should have lost" this game
Just like u can't expect the bench to play that well u also cant expect Kobe to score 14 & Pau to score 6 which they did in this game.
Lakers win by 19 & the haters still say they "should have lost" lolololololololol.....doesn't get much more clueless than that.
They also dominated the Mavs by 26 & the haters immediately come w/ the 'yea, but Metta & Meeks shot well'. Meeks was 4-8 lol. Good thing Meeks shot the lights out w/ that 4-8 performance or the Lakers would have lost instead of winning by 26
& Metta's shooting 42% from 3 this year. Even if u take away Metta's 5 three's & give Meeks an 0-8 Lakers still win....lol
Making excuses when a team wins by 26.....lolololololololol. The only thing more delusional than a Laker fan is a Laker hater.
Against the nuggets meeks went 7/8 from 3s and jamison dropped 33.
If you think that's replicable whenever the lakers feel like turning it on, you're delusional.
Just a realist tellin it how it is, keep backin the lakers see how it works out for you
-
12-13-12 11:11 AM #41
Laker hater much?? You're the moron that said the Lakers "should have lost" even though the won by 19 & 26 Originally Posted by blanco
Do you have any idea how moronic that statement is??
Kobe also went for 15 & Pau 6. If you think that's replicable than you are dumber than you sound for claiming the Lakers "should have lost" games they won by 26 & 19..... final: LAL 115-89.....Final LAL 122-103 yep "should have lost"
You really think 3-5 from three is an impossible feat?? Let me repeat this since you obv struggle w/ comprehension. Even if Meeks goes 0-5 instead of 3-5 & Metta goes 0-7 instead of 5-7 the Lakers still win by 2 & thats w/ Kobe scoring only 15 & Pau scoring only 6....lol
I'm taking the reverse argument. If Kobe scores his usual 30 & Pau scores 14 the Lakers win by 49 instead of 26!!
Laker haters get so bent out of shape when somebody on the bench actually hits a shot. They are NBA players bro, believe it or not they are capable of knocking down a shot every once in a while.
And btw, backing the Lakers has worked out quite well for me. While you've been swimming in a puddle of tears for the last 12 seasons I've watched the Lakers hang 5 banners. How many has your team hung??
-
12-13-12 11:18 AM #42
lol, I'm here to make money not argue about championships. Sorry our 6 came a decade before you. Never seen someone get so butthurt about their team being bad ATS. I've been advocating fading the bulls so far this year by the way. grow up bud
-
12-13-12 11:48 AM #43
Sorry, basketball does not work like this, please try again. Originally Posted by upscope
-
12-13-12 11:54 AM #44
I guess that's your recourse for ZERO huh?? Originally Posted by blanco
Who said anything bout spread?? You cry because the Lakers bench actually hit a few shots & won a game by 26. Then you proceeded to justify the reasons why they "should have lost" games they won by 26 & 19!!
Believe it or not Meeks shoots 40% from 3 & Metta nearly 43%. No need to get upset when they hit a few. They are actually expected to hit a few.
-
12-13-12 11:56 AM #45
Obv u didnt read the above posts?? Originally Posted by CDMKMP
-
12-13-12 11:59 AM #46
Looks like lot of money came in on LA
-
12-13-12 12:08 PM #47
lol @ upset. lol @ MWP 43%. I said things about spreads. You said things about championships. I argued why you can't count on the bench to light it up at will, which is what it has taken for the lakers to really play well this year. keep defending your boys on internet forums though Originally Posted by upscope
-
12-13-12 12:26 PM #48
U said zero about spreads. You said the Lakers "should have lost" games they won by 26 & 19 Originally Posted by blanco
Your reason was Meeks shot 3/5 from 3 & Metta 5/7 from 3. I guess you expect them to miss every shot?? I am not defending anybody. I'm informing you how retarded your statement was because if Meeks & Metta miss every single one of those shots.......THEY STILL WIN BY TWO!!
Is it really that difficult for u to realize how retarded your statement was?? Hate all u want but @ least be logical while doing so.
-
12-13-12 12:27 PM #49
Guys Lakers didn't give a damn about Cleveland they were clearly looking ahead to the Knicks game you could tell by their effort
And I've been auto fading them since game 1 but if you are ever gonna take Lakers this season it's getting 6 at MSG on a primetime TNT game
-
12-13-12 12:45 PM #50
ya I'm starting to agree with this Originally Posted by ChiLLx
-
12-13-12 12:51 PM #51
Everybody seems focused on the Lakers but I really think this game is the Knicks for the taking, if they want it. What is their mindset today? Do they care much?
-
12-13-12 12:53 PM #52
best bet is LA under 101 points..no way Knicks D gives up 100+ on primetime TV (La on B2b)
-
12-13-12 01:02 PM #53
Lakers didn't play last night, lunch. Originally Posted by lunchbawks
-
12-13-12 01:10 PM #54
La has won 2 road games all year, they will come up short of 101 unless kobe scores 55 Originally Posted by No coincidences
-
12-13-12 01:19 PM #55
How can you say the Knicks aren't really great? They probably have the deepest team in the league this year. Right now are playing like the best team in the league. There team can shoot the ball making it hard for teams to double Melo and there ball movement has been fantastic. You haven't watched the Knicks this year if you don't think they're great. They have Felton, Melo, JR Smith, Kidd, Novak, Melo, Chandler, Wallace, Brewer, all of them playing well and knocking down shots. The Lakers have Kobe, Dwight, Metta, and that's it. The bench of the Knicks should make this one a blow out. Originally Posted by Goat Milk
-
12-13-12 02:28 PM #56
Definitely agree. Aside from a few games knicks have been flowing as a team tremendously. Felton is generating a lot of offense. Originally Posted by Ambition
Thinking about taking the knicks for obvious reasons, but I hope the lakers get blown the fock out so upscope can cry the night away into his Lakers thong
-
12-13-12 04:01 PM #57
I know Lakers have been bad when Kobe scores a lot but he won't let this game get out of hand.
-
12-13-12 05:41 PM #58
hmmm,, i played la tt ov 100..you may be on to something.. Originally Posted by lunchbawks
-
12-13-12 05:49 PM #59
Trends for anyone who believes in it
THURSDAY TRENDS:
Home Teams are 1-8-1 ATS
5 OVERS 5 UNDERS
B2B is 5-1-1 ATS
B2B is 3-4 O/U
Home Favorites are 0-7-1 ATS
Home Underdogs are 1-1 ATS
-
12-13-12 06:01 PM #60
Well, at least I got a good number. I feel like this is a good time to back LA with everyone so down on them. I also think the Knicks are overrated. Originally Posted by BigDofBA
-
12-13-12 06:16 PM #61
i don't know about the lakers here without pau.
-
12-13-12 06:38 PM #62
Knicks -5.5 for me. 1 unit.
-
12-13-12 08:37 PM #63
Yeah so, lakers getting blown out and Knicks have 8 threes already.
Hate being a Laker fan right now but I'll take the money betting against them.
Reply With Quote
