Originally Posted by
BigDofBA
Why is it cool that OKC fouls down 5 at the end of the game but it's not cool they take a shot on the following possession?
To all of you morons that think OKC should have given up, then they should have lost by 5 because had they given up, the final score would have been 100-95.
Instead OKC fouls, Paker hits one of two to put the Spurs up 6. Then Harden hits a three. The Spurs should have never covered in the first place.
I love how people can blame it all on one shot. How about Parker leaving Westbrook wide open on the three before that? If OKC misses that, they lose by 8 because they wouldn't have fouled and if they did it would have been a 10 point game.
Why not blame it on the team you were backing for giving up three uncontested three pointers?