Originally Posted by
demens
I dont understand why people keep thinking the Hawks match-up well with Orlando. They happened to win 3 times during the year, it does not mean they match-up well, you need to dig deep to analyze those wins and when they came, under what kind of circumstances and whether they have any meaning at all.
They were 1-7 last season, including the play-off sweep the 7 losses were all by 14 points or more. I think maybe a little motivational factors played a part in Atl "matching up" well vs Orlando this year. It wont last all series and the better team will step it up eventually.
And dont try to act like these teams are so different that last years records dont matter. They clearly matched up like shit last year, so look at the changes in detail and tell me how it is that Atl matches up well this time around. Atl has practically the same roster other then Hinrich, is he an upgrade over Biddy, sure are the Hawks better under Drew then they were under Woodson, hell NO! Now look at Orlando, are they as good as they were last year, nope, whats different about them? Vince Carter is gone, Lewis is gone and Gortat is gone, now please tell me which of those 3 was the reason match-up problem that cause ATL to lose 7 games by and average of 24 points to Orlando last year? Because i dont think its any of them. So what is the difference then?
This match-up is pretty simple to me. Hawks can't stop Howard, they already showed that in game 1. So its all on the shoulders of Magic shooters. If they shoot well, i see no match-up or adjustment Hawks can throw at them to have any chance at all. The problem with shooters is they are not hot each game. But i'd bet they will be hot more games then they wont be in this series.