That is my point.
Perkins was obviousIy important to that team especiaIIy on the defensive end.
Bynum wouId have meant a Iot to his team as weII.. No teIIing how it wouId have pIayed out but another 7 footer in the paint to grab boards and bIock shots wouId def be a pIus...
AII I'm saying is that the comment couId easiIy be argued the other way for the 1st meeting in the FinaIs, "The Iakers couId have won 3 straight FinaIs if they wouId have had Bynum" The onIy difference is I said "couId have" and you said "wouId have"