1. #1
    EaglesPhan36
    EaglesPhan36's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-06-06
    Posts: 71,662

    Hilarious. Writer Whining About Caps Loss

    http://dailycaller.com/2010/04/29/th...-loss-a-fraud/

    The Washington Capitals scored the same number of goals as the Montreal Canadiens Wednesday. The Caps only lost because referee Brad Watson called back one of their goals.


    On the play in question, Capitals right wing Mike Knuble, pushed by a Canadiens defender, barely glanced the Habs’ goalie while on the edge of the goal crease.
    The NHL rulebook says in this situation, the goal should be disallowed if “an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal.”


    In this case, the only significant contact between Knuble and the goalie was Knuble’s skate, which did not visibly cause the goalie to move.



    “That’s a violation that hasn’t been called all year,” Knuble said.
    It’s not the first time the Capitals have suffered terrible refereeing in the playoffs. They lost a game seven at home two years ago against the Philadelphia Flyers on the penalty kill from a questionable call. And who can forget that the Pittsburgh Penguins had about twice as many power plays in last year’s series?


    Notably, Knuble — and his then-teammate Flyers — nearly murdered the Caps’ goalie when they beat Washington two years ago. Then, Knuble largely got away with it. But now that he’s a Capital, a touch sensitive enough for a baby is enough to call back a goal.


    The referee, Watson, was standing in a position such that the goalie was in the way of his view of Knuble’s contact with the goalie. It’s unlikely he was able to see the contact with his own eyes.


    Under NHL rules, the play is not reviewable by video.


    The goal tied the game at one at the beginning of the third period. Having it taken away sucked momentum from the Caps like a vacuum. The Caps had been dominating the Canadiens the last two games of the series with nothing to show for it because of the Montreal goalie’s unfathomably good play.


    It is a bitter, bitter pill for Caps fans to swallow when a playoff series is decided by a referee’s clearly errant call. What makes it worse is the longstanding pattern of questionable refereeing for the Capitals in the playoffs.


    Caps Coach Bruce Boudreau revealed the Canadiens had been quietly lobbying the league on the very question of goalie interference throughout the series. Montreal “talked about us being in front of the net all the time to the supervisor. I don’t know if that had any effect or not,” he said.


    Did the NHL’s famous bias for Canadian teams give Montreal an edge on the most significant moment of the series?

    Guess getting outplayed for three straight games didn't have anything to do with the Canadiens winning, it was one play. LoL.

    Last edited by SBR Jonelyn; 04-15-15 at 04:22 PM. Reason: image does not exist

  2. #2
    tomcast
    tomcast's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-19-06
    Posts: 754
    Betpoints: 251

    very stupid

  3. #3
    JC2008
    JC2008's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-27-08
    Posts: 2,258
    Betpoints: 2519

    Montreal won fair and square.

  4. #4
    bruceBRUCEbruce
    bruceBRUCEbruce's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-20-09
    Posts: 2,560
    Betpoints: 1959

    Quote Originally Posted by JC2008 View Post
    Montreal won fair and square.
    meh. that was a horrendous call, no doubt.

  5. #5
    yisman
    yisman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 75,682
    Betpoints: 246162

    it was the correct call. Knuble did bump him and it affected Halak's ability to make the save.

    If they had called it a penalty, Washington would've had the right to be upset, but they didn't.

    BTW, the same call happened on the other end. No goal, and no penalty.

    So according to the biased jackass who wrote the article, the final score should have 3-2 Habs.

  6. #6
    superjeff24
    superjeff24's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-17-10
    Posts: 1,078
    Betpoints: 66

    That guys an idiot. The NHL favors Canadian teams? So that's why both Calgary and Edmonton lost in 7 games back to back years, then Ottawa loses in 5 the next. Wow such bias. The NHL loves Canadian teams so much that it allows them a chance at the stanley cup finals before allowing them to lose.

  7. #7
    Retibol
    Retibol's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-18-10
    Posts: 364
    Betpoints: 1001

    Quote Originally Posted by EaglesPhan36 View Post
    Guess getting outplayed for three straight games didn't have anything to do with the Canadiens winning, it was one play. LoL.
    Capitals had 134 Shots on goal last 3games. Against Canadiens 66.
    Outplayed? By Halak maybe

  8. #8
    bruceBRUCEbruce
    bruceBRUCEbruce's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-20-09
    Posts: 2,560
    Betpoints: 1959

    Quote Originally Posted by yisman View Post
    it was the correct call. Knuble did bump him and it affected Halak's ability to make the save.

  9. #9
    yisman
    yisman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 75,682
    Betpoints: 246162

    it was. You can laugh all you want, but it doesn't change the reality.

  10. #10
    yisman
    yisman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 75,682
    Betpoints: 246162

    Quote Originally Posted by Retibol View Post
    Capitals had 134 Shots on goal last 3games. Against Canadiens 66.
    Outplayed? By Halak maybe
    The goalie is a big part of the game.

    Outshooting the other team by a big margin probably means your forwards/defensemen outplayed theirs, but Montreal had a huge advantage in net, and the goalie is very instrumental, of course.

  11. #11
    inflames
    inflames's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-08-09
    Posts: 711
    Betpoints: 14616

    They should've closed the series before game 7 when leading it with 3-1..well done by habs!

  12. #12
    bruceBRUCEbruce
    bruceBRUCEbruce's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-20-09
    Posts: 2,560
    Betpoints: 1959

    Quote Originally Posted by yisman View Post
    it was. You can laugh all you want, but it doesn't change the reality.
    the reality that the refs saw something that didn't happen?

  13. #13
    OTL
    OTL's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-08-10
    Posts: 2,433
    Betpoints: 5277

    I agree it was a good goal and a horrible call, but the series never should've gone to a game 7 in the first place. Washington blew it plain and simple.

  14. #14
    yisman
    yisman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 75,682
    Betpoints: 246162

    Quote Originally Posted by bruceBRUCEbruce View Post
    the reality that the refs saw something that didn't happen?
    The reality is that Halak got bumped. It's not debatable. Try watching the play.

  15. #15
    dooman14
    dooman14's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-23-09
    Posts: 263

    took guts for that ref to make that call and it was a rule voilation

  16. #16
    70kgman
    70kgman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-10
    Posts: 4,354
    Betpoints: 1895

    It was borderline. But the caps seemed to have the edge in bad calls in games 1-6. The refs were probably the only reason there was even a game 7.

  17. #17
    Illusivecone
    Illusivecone's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-08
    Posts: 771
    Betpoints: 438

    Give him a break, in DC they have the Nats, Redskins and Wizards to deal with...

  18. #18
    Eleven
    Eleven's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-07-09
    Posts: 730

    The 2 ref system sucks.

  19. #19
    treece
    treece's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-28-07
    Posts: 6,298
    Betpoints: 198

    Glad to see Montreal in the next round.

  20. #20
    byronbb
    byronbb's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-13-08
    Posts: 3,067
    Betpoints: 2284

    You can't make a conspiracy theory that the NHL would rather see Habs vs Pens over Ovechkin vs Crosby, that's just funny.

  21. #21
    PuckOff
    PuckOff's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-14-07
    Posts: 2,395
    Betpoints: 4352

    totally the correct call. You can't interfer with the goalie. The Habs had Ovie figured out. He can shoot and skate, but he doesn't make other players around him any better.

  22. #22
    Soxsfan9
    Update your status
    Soxsfan9's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-30-08
    Posts: 3,705
    Betpoints: 91

    Quote Originally Posted by PuckOff View Post
    totally the correct call. You can't interfer with the goalie. The Habs had Ovie figured out. He can shoot and skate, but he doesn't make other players around him any better.
    Sharp Post....100% agree!

Top