You're welcome, sir. Please drop in and contribute and information or questions, etc. that you have along the season. The more the merrier.
This is a great point. I'm not exactly sure how to account for this statistically (or if it even warrants quantitative analysis), but my model DOES adjust for back-to-back games, and 3 games in 4 nights stretches. I do think the NHL does a fairly decent job of scheduling games. In this case, they played Carolina (East Coast) on Tuesday, and travel to LA to play tonight. What helps is the fact that this is a late game (10:30Eastern), so they get an extra few hours thanks to the NHL schedulers. Also, FL is 8-5 playing away games this year...and scoring more goals when they play there. Will look into travel distances with a little more gusto at some point in the off season, but my guess would be that: 1) It doesn't affect good teams as much as bad teams (teams w. deeper benches, etc.) 2) The effect is compounded as the season progresses (after 60 games played, traveling might be of larger impact) Question for anyone that may know: Do teams differ in their travelling protocol? Do some teams fly out as soon as possible after a game, and others recuperate before traveling? Would be interested to see if every team adopts the same strategy or they're all different. If I were a coach, I'd want my team to get a workout in after the game and get some quality rest in before hopping on an airplane, so I would tend to lean towards leaving as late as possible while still giving my team time to adjust for time differences/weather, what have you. In all honesty though, these guys are professional athletes that are USED to this sort of thing, so again, my guess would be that it doesn't affect teams that are healthy. Good topic Nick, you got my head spinning now...