[pinchylarue]

this same thing happened last year.
beginning of playoffs were all unders, then it reversed to all overs in the middle games.

now start betting under again. I guarantee more games finish under than over.

[warriorfan707]

[McDorman]

Guarantee? I kind of like the over for both games tonight. I think the Flyers will bounce back like they did after game 1, and the Nashville/ Anaheim series has been well over in every game. (Except game 1 in which they still put up 5 goals combined)

Anyway, I disagree but BOL

[lcscanada]

It is silly to place bets using past history. Sure, if the teams were the same, but they are not. Even a few players can change the whole dynamic. Picking totals depends more on goalies mental strength to handle playoff pressure, veteran defense, and which coaches know what to do with special teams. Not because last year they went bla bla bla.

[supr_villn]

this same thing happened last year.
beginning of playoffs were all unders, then it reversed to all overs in the middle games.

now start betting under again. I guarantee more games finish under than over.

he's right ..

& both gm's 2nite are pivotal
so u can presume tighter play

(just saying -> or he was ,, whichever)

[bobbyk1133]

I stopped reading after I saw "guarantee"..

Some kidz never learn

[pinchylarue]

I stopped reading after I saw "guarantee".. Some kidz never learn

#1 im not a kid
#2 watch and see
the nashville/anaheim will be under 5

[TrajaD]

1/6.... If buffalo vs philly went over. and mtl went over yesterday. Im thinking this will be over 8.5 goals

[bobbyk1133]

#1 im not a kid #2 watch and see the nashville/anaheim will be under 5

Just like the BUF/PHI game was under? Run along and find your toys.

[pinchylarue]

Just like the BUF/PHI game was under? Run along and find your toys.

this is my thread man!
you need to piss off.
i'm just saying now there will be more unders than overs for the rest of round 1.
so I went 50/50 with my picks tonight, I was also + 0.25 units.
still profit.

and please, don't resort to childish name calling.
that just proves you can handle an intelligent conversation.

cheers

[bobbyk1133]

Ok sorry. I didn't realize this was an open forum.

Next time put up a sign that says -- unless you agree with me, don't post here.

[pinchylarue]

Ok sorry. I didn't realize this was an open forum. Next time put up a sign that says -- unless you agree with me, don't post here.

no no,
you can post here I don't care. just please don't resort to the name calling it's very immature.
also I am +0.25 for the day just from betting unders, so technically my strategy is working so far.
tomorrow there will be lots of unders !

[bobbyk1133]

Technically your under 5 just disappeared.

Next time you want to drop a "guarantee" on a betting forum...grow some thicker skin.

[pinchylarue]

so you come in here after and dis me?
but where are you before the games are over and done with?

classless.
stop rubbing salt in the wound.
1 bad day, tomorrow will recoup for todays loss of -2.0 units.

no big deal

[pinchylarue]

by the way I had under 5.5 in the preds game not 5.0.
but even so, it is probably screwed too.
just saying

[lcscanada]

he's right ..

& both gm's 2nite are pivotal
so u can presume tighter play

(just saying -> or he was ,, whichever)

LOL OH YEAH ALL UNDER ROFL, both games tonight OVER
ROFL

[bobbyk1133]

by the way I had under 5.5 in the preds game not 5.0. but even so, it is probably screwed too. just saying

You lost your 5.5 bet too.

Just saying.

[pinchylarue]

You lost your 5.5 bet too. Just saying.

yep .

so I assume you win everyday?
must be nice

[EaglesPhan36]

I think if you make your bets based on things "evening" out from round-2-round, you'll go broke. You have to look at the matchups regardless of what you perceive & look at how the games play out early in the series. Look at Montreal-Boston, lots of goals in the regular season and that is now coming out in the later games. Nashville-Anaheim goals ALL season and a ridiculous allergy to going above 5 on the O-U by bookies in that series even though goals have flowed in that series. Same thing with DET-PHX. Six goals pretty regular in the regular season + first few games of the playoffs, but books did not adjust and kept o5.5 at plus money for the whole four game set. San Jose-LA is staying at 5, but would you trust it to finish under with as well as the Sharks are doing now?

[pinchylarue]

I think if you make your bets based on things "evening" out from round-2-round, you'll go broke. You have to look at the matchups regardless of what you perceive & look at how the games play out early in the series. Look at Montreal-Boston, lots of goals in the regular season and that is now coming out in the later games. Nashville-Anaheim goals ALL season and a ridiculous allergy to going above 5 on the O-U by bookies in that series even though goals have flowed in that series. Same thing with DET-PHX. Six goals pretty regular in the regular season + first few games of the playoffs, but books did not adjust and kept o5.5 at plus money for the whole four game set. San Jose-LA is staying at 5, but would you trust it to finish under with as well as the Sharks are doing now?

see ! now this is intelligent.
thanks for the input eaglesphan !
I think the unders will be better tomorrow for sure.

another thing I have noticed is that in the beginning of the series when teams are "feeling out" eachothers systems, they tend to be more cautious causing far more unders. through games 3-7 , they know what to expect and offense is more prevalent.

[Yich123]

bad choice for phili and buff game

[bobbyk1133]

see ! now this is intelligent. thanks for the input eaglesphan ! I think the unders will be better tomorrow for sure. another thing I have noticed is that in the beginning of the series when teams are "feeling out" eachothers systems, they tend to be more cautious causing far more unders. through games 3-7 , they know what to expect and offense is more prevalent.

I'm all for intelligent discussion, but throwing out guarantees is just stupid. And based on what? Last year? Yes that's a great sample size.

Ill give you the benefit of the doubt and see how it works out after today....but I've been around long enough to know that "guarantees" are red flags because they don't exist in the betting world.

[pinchylarue]

have you read anything I said?
and so what I guaranteed a pick, at least is didnt lock it in like most fools.
I will never guarantee anything on here again for fear of being ridiculed.
lesson learned.

goodnight sir.

[Petenana15]

OVER, OVER... enough said.

[pinchylarue]

OVER, OVER... enough said.

....there are still games tomorrow.enough said.

[twelvejewelz]

....there are still games tomorrow.enough said.

At least 2 of those games are going over possibly 3 good luck though.

[TrajaD]

Tomorrow = OVER.. all over again.
Now you and your "last year". What the hell does last year have to do with this year. OH LAST YEAR chicago won... they must win again.

[bobbyk1133]

Another over.

[pinchylarue]

you guys too cowardly to post here tonight?

[bobbyk1133]

Are you talking to me?

[twelvejewelz]

you guys too cowardly to post here tonight?

Cashed in on all of the overs tonight once again!!