nfl correlated half parlay?

**sharpcat** · 10-30-11, 10:46 PM

Have you ever considered compiling your own database so that you can do your own homework?

**Pancho sanza** · 10-31-11, 07:59 AM

Originally posted by mm9182

one of my books was allowing me to parlay the ravens -10 and over 17 (i think 17 was the total) in last nights game for the 2nd half..based on the 3to1 rule of correlated parlays, this would be a MAJOR correlation? any thoughts? if so how would you approach this if you were me?

17 was not the total, not even close

**darko3131** · 10-31-11, 09:05 AM

I was able to parlay Saints and Over for the 2nd half and thought it was odd as well.

**BigDaddy** · 10-31-11, 09:50 AM

like above poster said total was not 17

what book let you parlay it?

you can send a PM

**LT Profits** · 10-31-11, 09:59 AM

Ravens second half total was 21.5, so still good correlation. Saints were -10 and 24.

**RickySteve** · 10-31-11, 02:27 PM

You people are f ing morons.

**mm9182** · 11-02-11, 09:38 PM

Originally posted by Pancho sanza

17 was not the total, not even close

it doesnt matter exactly what it was in this case bc it hit by plenty

**mm9182** · 11-02-11, 09:41 PM

Originally posted by sharpcat

Have you ever considered compiling your own database so that you can do your own homework?

yea i do have my own database, but i have not been doing this for too long so i do have questions..sorry i was not born with all this information like you apparently were..i was under the impression this website was made for people to talk, ask questions, and bounce ideas off each other about gambling..

**RickySteve** · 11-03-11, 05:15 PM

Originally posted by mm9182

i was under the impression this website was made for people to talk, ask questions, and bounce ideas off each other about gambling..

No one that you would want advice from is ever going to tell you anything remotely useful in a public venue. The better you eat, the more I starve.

**mm9182** · 11-03-11, 09:22 PM

Originally posted by RickySteve

No one that you would want advice from is ever going to tell you anything remotely useful in a public venue. The better you eat, the more I starve.

good point

**That Foreign Guy** · 11-04-11, 06:50 AM

Originally posted by mm9182

it doesnt matter exactly what it was in this case bc it hit by plenty

Um. Really?

**jolmscheid** · 11-04-11, 08:59 AM

Hey LT..for 35%+ correlation, is that +Ev longterm following blindly? And of course where available?

**BigDaddy** · 11-04-11, 09:16 AM

Originally posted by jolmscheid

Hey LT..for 35%+ correlation, is that +Ev longterm following blindly? And of course where available?

i think it need to be about 60-65% for it to be +ev