Good point,
that's why I don't understand what all of you people saying...
Does someone really try to arbitrage a game for 2$ on every $100 risk ? that's just not worth it... so he is in for making like $10 ? $20 / game and the risk involved is having the money on the line when he wins its cool but if he loses he needs like years of arbitraging this measly $$ in order to get back ?! doesn't make ANY sense to me... someone care to comment on this?
As far as I understand, it's all about BRM, if you don't go crazy and bet right % of your bankroll on each play , reduce if lose , increase if wins, that's the way to go... I don't get you people.. you turned something really simple into NASA theories and explanations ! LOL