1. #1
    john_dope
    john_dope's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-08-09
    Posts: 3

    Mutually Exclusive Events and Kelly Calculator Results in -EV Bets?

    Hi I have been reading Ganchrow's posts regarding Kelly betting and came to this example regarding mutually exclusive outcomes.

    The results seem to imply betting a percentage of your bankroll on an negative EV bet (Bet C) is optimal. Am I missing something here? How can it be right to bet at 1.99 odds an event which occurs 50% of the time?

    Thanks



    Consider the following bets on 4 mutually exclusive outcomes:
    • actual prob=50%, odds=1.99
    • actual prob=25%, odds=4
    • actual prob=15%, odds=6.5
    • actual prob=10%, odds=10.5


    Sorting by edge yields:
    1. p=10%, odds=10.5, edge=5%, implied prob=9.5238%
    2. p=25%, odds=4, edge=0%, implied prob=25.0000%
    3. p=50%, odds=1.99, edge=-0.5%, implied prob=50.2513%
    4. p=15%, odds=6.5, edge=-2.5%, implied prob=15.3846%


    The running implied probabilities totals are:
    1. 9.5238%
    2. 34.5238%
    3. 84.7751%
    4. 100.1597%


    Because the sum of implied probabilities is 100.1597% > 100%, no true arb exists and we proceed.

    The running actual probabilities totals are:
    1. 10%
    2. 35%
    3. 85%
    4. 100%


    The quotients are then:
    1. 0.994736842
    2. 0.992727273
    3. 0.985225933
    4. 0


    The minimum quotient greater than 0 is 0.985225933.

    Hence the stakes for each bet are:
    1. stake=max(10% - 0.985225933 * 9.5238%,0) ≈ 0.6169%
    2. stake=max(25% - 0.985225933 * 25.000%,0) ≈ 0.3694%
    3. stake=max(50% - 0.985225933 * 50.2513%,0) ≈ 0.4912%
    4. stake=max(15% - 0.985225933 * 15.3846%,0) = 0%

  2. #2
    Data
    Data's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-27-07
    Posts: 2,236

    Quote Originally Posted by john_dope View Post
    Hi I have been reading Ganchrow's posts regarding Kelly betting and came to this example regarding mutually exclusive outcomes.

    The results seem to imply betting a percentage of your bankroll on an negative EV bet (Bet C) is optimal. Am I missing something here?
    Keep reading, you will learn that making -EV bets is not uncommon while trying to maximize EG. This applies to offsetting +EV bets on mutually exclusive outcomes which includes such methods as arbitrage and "buying back".

  3. #3
    u21c3f6
    u21c3f6's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-17-09
    Posts: 790
    Betpoints: 5198

    Quote Originally Posted by Data View Post
    Keep reading, you will learn that making -EV bets is not uncommon while trying to maximize EG. This applies to offsetting +EV bets on mutually exclusive outcomes which includes such methods as arbitrage and "buying back".
    +1

    Joe.

Top