Books price period lines with underdogs having higher win% in first period compared to second. But I have NHL database going back to 2005 and shows that underdogs win more in the second period compared to first period? Could this be correct?
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
11-26-21 06:19 PM #1
Could my NHL Period Score Data be Wrong??
-
11-27-21 03:37 AM #2
Well, go ahead and exploit the inefficiency. I don't do 1P in NHL but in Euro hockey I sometimes take a big dog in 1P because big favs don't take them seriously at the start of the match.
Reply With Quote