1. #1
    jolmscheid
    jolmscheid's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-10
    Posts: 3,256

    Kelly Money Management??

    Ok...I have heard that one should keep their bet sizes constant ALWAYS....I have heard that one should re-calculate their bet size when the bankroll increases or decreases by 15-20%....and I have heard that one should re-calculate their bet size after each day / wager...

    So which is best?

    If one re-calculates their unit size after each wager, doesn't this in essence RAISE the break-even percentage needed to profit??

  2. #2
    jolmscheid
    jolmscheid's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-10
    Posts: 3,256

    I see pros and cons to both re-calculating and straight betting....but I would really appreciate what others think about this and why...I appreciate it!

  3. #3
    chilidog
    chilidog's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-05-09
    Posts: 10,304
    Betpoints: 956

    Are you currently profitable?

  4. #4
    jolmscheid
    jolmscheid's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-10
    Posts: 3,256

    Quote Originally Posted by chilidog View Post
    Are you currently profitable?
    Currently I am profitable, yes...I just want to know what way is the best way longterm? Thanks Chili...

  5. #5
    FourLengthsClear
    King of the Idiots
    FourLengthsClear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-29-10
    Posts: 3,808
    Betpoints: 508

    Kelly Criterion is the optimal method of money management in terms of maximising bankroll growth for a profitable bettor.

    In the long run, iIt does not raise or reduce the required percentage of winning bets. It does however mean that a bad string of results will severely dent your bankroll and for this reason, even many of its proponents, use it on a fractional basis.

    Kelly can only work if you have a strong basis for being able to calculate your edge on a wager by wager basis. If you are interested in following up there is lots of good reading if you google "Kelly Criterion".

  6. #6
    jolmscheid
    jolmscheid's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-10
    Posts: 3,256

    Quote Originally Posted by FourLengthsClear View Post
    Kelly Criterion is the optimal method of money management in terms of maximising bankroll growth for a profitable bettor.

    In the long run, iIt does not raise or reduce the required percentage of winning bets. It does however mean that a bad string of results will severely dent your bankroll and for this reason, even many of its proponents, use it on a fractional basis.

    Kelly can only work if you have a strong basis for being able to calculate your edge on a wager by wager basis. If you are interested in following up there is lots of good reading if you google "Kelly Criterion".
    Thank you, but am I correct when I say that kelly says to re-calculate after each wager?

  7. #7
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    If you are not comfortable enough to calculate your edge on each play (i.e., use Kelly), then the next best thing is use fixed percentage (usually 2-2.5%) of bankroll, with that percentage being the "To Win" amount. Now theoretically, you are supposed to recalculate bankroll after each play, but you can get away with recalculating at the start of each day, which is what I do.

  8. #8
    FourLengthsClear
    King of the Idiots
    FourLengthsClear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-29-10
    Posts: 3,808
    Betpoints: 508

    Quote Originally Posted by jolmscheid View Post
    Thank you, but am I correct when I say that kelly says to re-calculate after each wager?
    In dollar terms, yes.

    Essentially Kelly will give you a percentage of your bankroll to wager which is, of course, dependant on the quantum of your edge.

    I din't know if you are aware but there is a Kelly Calculator here.
    http://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-tools/kelly-calculator/

    It is probably worth playing around with that for 10 minutes or so.
    Last edited by FourLengthsClear; 11-02-11 at 08:06 PM.

  9. #9
    Stocks
    Stocks's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-10
    Posts: 569
    Betpoints: 2984

    So lets say you hit 55% at -110 and if I'm using that calc correctly 55% is the same as a 5% edge?

    Kelly says bet 5.5% for -110, 3.3% for +150, 7.5% for -150 and so on so basicly you just bet more on favourites and less on dogs.

  10. #10
    FourLengthsClear
    King of the Idiots
    FourLengthsClear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-29-10
    Posts: 3,808
    Betpoints: 508

    Quote Originally Posted by Stocks View Post
    So lets say you hit 55% at -110 and if I'm using that calc correctly 55% is the same as a 5% edge?

    Kelly says bet 5.5% for -110, 3.3% for +150, 7.5% for -150 and so on so basicly you just bet more on favourites and less on dogs.
    55% at -110 is a 5.0% edge, yes.

    55.00% / 52.38%* = 1.05
    * 52.38% is the implied win percentage of -110 odds.

    If your edge was 5% on every single bet then as you say, the risk amount (in percentage of bankroll terms) is inversely proportional to the odds. The calculator I linked to allows you to change from percentages to dollar figures.

  11. #11
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by Stocks View Post
    So lets say you hit 55% at -110 and if I'm using that calc correctly 55% is the same as a 5% edge?

    Kelly says bet 5.5% for -110, 3.3% for +150, 7.5% for -150 and so on so basicly you just bet more on favourites and less on dogs.
    Right, but if you know your edge is 5%, you don't really need the calculator, just bet TO WIN 5% of bankroll, which is exactly the same profit for the risk percentages you gave at the prices you gave, That way you save time for more important things.

  12. #12
    tukkk
    ★★★★★
    tukkk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-04-10
    Posts: 391

    if you dont recalculate after every bet, then you are overbetting when you just lost and underbetting when you won.

  13. #13
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Quote Originally Posted by tukkk View Post
    if you dont recalculate after every bet, then you are overbetting when you just lost and underbetting when you won.
    Technically true but when you are making 40-50 bets a day, it is just more practical to recalc daily. It should balance out in the wash in the long run anyway unless you run abnormally hot or cold for an extended period.

  14. #14
    That Foreign Guy
    I got sunshine in a bag
    That Foreign Guy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-18-10
    Posts: 432
    Betpoints: 3069

    I use a fractional kelly and recalculate after every "set" of results (daily for slow sports, each kickoff time for football).

  15. #15
    jolmscheid
    jolmscheid's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-20-10
    Posts: 3,256

    THanks for the insight guys...re-calculating after each bet / day seems to be the consensus here instead of re-calculating after a certain % growth / decline...

  16. #16
    statictheory
    statictheory's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-27-10
    Posts: 76
    Betpoints: 151

    Not to tout a tout but Dr Bobs Sports has some excellent free articles on sports betting and money management . That being said you cant go wrong with LT either

Top