1. #1
    Dougie Fresh
    Dougie Fresh's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-08
    Posts: 226

    NFL against the spread

    Anybody know the longest a NFL team has gone without covering a spread? Just wondering.

  2. #2
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    Since 1985, the longest ATS losing streak was 9 games by the Bengals in 1999.

  3. #3
    Dougie Fresh
    Dougie Fresh's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-08
    Posts: 226

    Thanks LT, do you have easy access to a year by year, who had the longest streak and how many games, You don't have to go back as far 1985 but maybe several years back. If not no big deal.

  4. #4
    Justin7
    Justin7's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-31-06
    Posts: 8,577
    Betpoints: 1506

    Interesting. You should expect to see that occurrence every 2-2.5 years or so. That might suggest the market overreacts to teams that don't cover, especially after 8-9 losses.

  5. #5
    HedgeHog
    HedgeHog's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 09-11-07
    Posts: 10,116
    Betpoints: 16961

    I wonder what the ATS record is for betting teams that have dropped at least 5 in a row to the spread? Could be a good contrarian angle.

  6. #6
    durito
    escarabajo negro
    durito's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-03-06
    Posts: 13,173
    Betpoints: 438

    Quote Originally Posted by HedgeHog View Post
    I wonder what the ATS record is for betting teams that have dropped at least 5 in a row to the spread? Could be a good contrarian angle.
    53.2%

  7. #7
    durito
    escarabajo negro
    durito's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-03-06
    Posts: 13,173
    Betpoints: 438

    Quote Originally Posted by Justin7 View Post
    Interesting. You should expect to see that occurrence every 2-2.5 years or so. That might suggest the market overreacts to teams that don't cover, especially after 8-9 losses.
    It has. Teams that have lost 8 or more games in a row are over 64% ATS the last 23 years. (68% as dogs)

  8. #8
    Dougie Fresh
    Dougie Fresh's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-08
    Posts: 226

    Quote Originally Posted by durito View Post
    It has. Teams that have lost 8 or more games in a row are over 64% ATS the last 23 years. (68% as dogs)
    how many games or teams?

  9. #9
    durito
    escarabajo negro
    durito's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-03-06
    Posts: 13,173
    Betpoints: 438

    54-30-2 ATS for 8 or more losses.

    328-276-2 ATS for 4 or more.

    Winless (0-4 or worse) underdogs are also over 60%.

  10. #10
    unit1884
    unit1884's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 06-11-08
    Posts: 938

    Damn, thats a killer angle, guaranteed money!!!

  11. #11
    Munson15
    Munson15's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-24-07
    Posts: 218

    I'd heard about the winless dogs theory, thanks for putting a number next to it. Another theory I have been tracking for a little while is double-digit dogs in the NBA. I have them at around 54% since last March, anyone with a database know how they've fared over the years? Thanks if you can help.

  12. #12
    durito
    escarabajo negro
    durito's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-03-06
    Posts: 13,173
    Betpoints: 438

    Around 52% since 1990-1991.

    FWIW I would not suggest playing any of these "angles".

  13. #13
    Munson15
    Munson15's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-24-07
    Posts: 218

    You feel the juice has been squeezed out of these oranges, Durito? That 60% on winless dogs has been pretty consistent, hasn't it?

  14. #14
    LT Profits
    LT Profits's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-27-06
    Posts: 90,963
    Betpoints: 5179

    The Lions have gone 4-2, 66.7% ATS since their 0-4 start.

  15. #15
    gm2022
    gm2022's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-28-08
    Posts: 4,128

    Quote Originally Posted by LT Profits View Post
    The Lions have gone 4-2, 66.7% ATS since their 0-4 start.
    hard in the nfl not to cover double digits spreads, at worst case u prob go 50%!

Top