1. #1
    That Foreign Guy
    I got sunshine in a bag
    That Foreign Guy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-18-10
    Posts: 432
    Betpoints: 3069

    Re-optimising Kelly futures

    So, I am in the enviable position of having some futures bets that are looking good. I've seen some good value lines on the same future. I'm a little confused about how to calculate my optimum bet size (numbers are imaginary).

    For example, let's say I have 100 on Dallas to win the NBA at 15.
    They are now available at 5 at a lazy bookie, fair price is less than that. If it was a new bet I'd bet 500.

    The way I see it there are three options:

    Bet To to win total - My new bet would win me 2000, I already have 1500 of pending winnings, therefore bet 100 to make my total win if dallas win 2000.

    Bet to risk total - My new bet would risk 500, I already risked 100, so bet 400 to make the amount at risk correct

    Bet to Kelly of weighted average of new and old odds - more difficult to explain but basically consider the old bet as providing a boost to the odds available and solve so that new bet size means I have a Kelly optimal bet at the weighted average odds.

    So in this case if I bet 500 at 5 I'd have 600 at 6.67 on average. However do I want to bet 600 @ 5 to make my total bet 700 @ 6.42 (assume that's Kelly optimal size for a new bet at 6.42). This feels like it's over-betting but at the same time you're moving your portfolio closer to kelly optimal distribution.

    Usually I bet to a risk total, if it's a high risk bet (eg we're talking 150 down to 20 or similar improvements I sometimes chicken out and go to a to win total because I'm not sure about the maths and don't want to overbet (but I am also a greedy ****er and if it's right to bet more, want to bet more).

    The opposite question is also of interest - if the price moves against you and you find a +EV bet on the opposite side. Do you just bet the new Kelly size, or should you bet more than that to try and re-balance your positions since the old bet "should" be smaller? I'm not talking about a -EV hedge here, the new bet is one you would make without future action.

    Assume tying up money is not an issue (ie the bets settle within a month or less of the new bet date).

  2. #2
    Pancho sanza
    Pancho sanza's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-18-07
    Posts: 386

    This should help.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Pancho sanza; 05-11-11 at 11:10 AM.
    Points Awarded:

    That Foreign Guy gave Pancho sanza 33 SBR Point(s) for this post.

    Nomination(s):
    This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: That Foreign Guy

  3. #3
    That Foreign Guy
    I got sunshine in a bag
    That Foreign Guy's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-18-10
    Posts: 432
    Betpoints: 3069

    Excellent, TY, saves me some faffing with Excel.

    Will hopefully find some real examples to use it on tonight and see how it feels.

  4. #4
    matekus
    matekus's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-26-07
    Posts: 39
    Betpoints: 4853

    Mark To Market and Dutch

    Notwithstanding the excellent answer given by Pancho, an alternative way to view the problem is ask how can I maximize my position for the eve of the NBA final:
    * Mark-To-Market position of current futures bet: $167 (approx)
    * Dutch Oklahoma ($120 @ 10.00) and Memphis ($40 @ 30.00) (Betfair prices) to win it all.
    * On eve of NBA final your position will be one of following: (Dallas - $1335, Memphis - $1160, or Oklahoma - $1125)

    matekus

Top