1. 10-24-12 01:16 PM #1
    Lazy-Man
    Lazy-Man's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-19-10
    Posts: 1,430
    Betpoints: 1137

    Would you veto this trade? Mendenhall/Dwyer/Washington for Wed Welker

    Is this extremely lopsided enough to be vetoed
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-24-12 01:17 PM #2
    Lazy-Man
    Lazy-Man's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-19-10
    Posts: 1,430
    Betpoints: 1137

    Wes*
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-24-12 02:58 PM #3
    GamblerSpirit
    TheCentaur, Spankie gone fishing :(
    GamblerSpirit's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-18-11
    Posts: 4,085
    Betpoints: 2

    I think so. I rather have the side with 3 players but it seems like mendenhall for wes SU with added rubbage
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-24-12 03:27 PM #4
    Cross
    Cross's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-15-11
    Posts: 5,777
    Betpoints: 9281

    Can't veto, but prob more value on Welker.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-25-12 02:27 PM #5
    greenhippo
    greenhippo's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-15-12
    Posts: 9,091
    Betpoints: 723

    I'd make the trade on both sides, all depends on what your team needs.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-25-12 04:36 PM #6
    dudekid
    the mon-fri fantasy guy
    dudekid's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-07-09
    Posts: 3,200
    Betpoints: 22

    no i dont think this is a trade to veto...you have to think of mendenhall and dwyer as one player because once one comes back the other is useless...so its kinda like mendenhall and washington for welker, which i think is a fair enough trade
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-25-12 06:04 PM #7
    koz-man
    Medula Oblongata
    koz-man's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-21-08
    Posts: 7,104
    Betpoints: 11971

    Agree, I would not veto this trade.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-25-12 07:23 PM #8
    Speedy88
    Speedy88's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-19-11
    Posts: 11,717
    Betpoints: 1636

    I'd take Welker all day. Other than last week, Nate Washington has pretty much been invisible all season long. I'm sure there are plenty of WR's on the waiver wire who are better/coparable to Washington, such as Josh Gordon or Titus Young.

    People are still overvaluing Mendy because of his name recognition. Steelers O-line is a mess, and I doubt Mendy will see heavy workloads the rest of the year.

    I'd much rather have Welker. Not to mention, who ever gets Mendy, Dwyer, and Washington will have to drop 2 players.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-25-12 08:43 PM #9
    dlunc3
    dlunc3's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-31-09
    Posts: 9,129
    Betpoints: 1076

    trade extremely lopsided... with that said, no trade should be vetoed unless you suspect collusion.. if both teams feel this helps them, unfortunately you should let it stand
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-26-12 12:56 AM #10
    Jrod124
    Update your status
    Jrod124's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-31-09
    Posts: 5,622
    Betpoints: 535

    What are the rosters? If the guy needs help at RB this trade makes sense, if this is a non PPR league then it is actually a fair trade. In PPR I would never trade Welker but its desperate times for some owners at the RB position. I am in a 12 team league where someone's RB's are Daryl Richardson, Michael Bush, William Powell and DeMarco Murray. People are hurting out there.

    Above post is also correct, who are you to decide what another owner needs? If he paid his entry and its not cheating you can't veto period.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-26-12 04:04 AM #11
    ttwarrior1
    ttwarrior1's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 06-23-09
    Posts: 28,301
    Betpoints: 9788

    veto that plus the guy has to drop 2 guys to do the damn trade
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Fantasy Sports Betting & Contests | Next Thread »