[No coincidences]

moneylines
12/05 22:07 +130 / -144
12/06 12:01 +134 / -148
12/08 18:15 +136 / -150
12/10 09:05 +137 / -152
12/10 17:10 +130 / -144
12/21 10:43 +127 / -140
12/21 23:11 +122 / -135
12/21 23:26 +120 / -132
12/21 23:53 +118 / -130
12/22 09:55 +119 / -131
12/22 12:16 +120 / -132
12/29 10:46 +118 / -130
12/31 13:26 +114 / -126
01/01 16:45 +116 / -128
01/01 16:46 +118 / -130
01/03 12:05 +120 / -133
01/03 23:57 +112 / -124
01/06 11:27 +111 / -123
01/09 15:24 +112 / -124
01/09 16:54 +111 / -123
01/09 19:59 +108 / -119
01/10 00:43 +106 / -117
01/10 09:30 +105 / -116
01/10 11:10 +104 / -115
01/10 11:12 +102 / -113
01/10 15:26 +101 / -111
01/10 15:37 -103 / -107
01/10 16:11 -105 / -105
01/10 16:52 -106 / -104
01/10 17:12 -107 / -103
01/10 17:14 -106 / -104
01/10 17:15 -107 / -103
01/10 17:18 -108 / -102
01/10 17:23 -107 / -103
01/10 17:51 -108 / -102

[VTranX]

so what...we get better value.

[JamesBrown]

[wrongturn]

Why? It is still 50/50 shot.

[texhooper]

i personally don't really give a f\*\*k. i knew i'd come over here and see that you'd posted some line move mess about this game.

[El_Pateaux]

Pretty sure they're ignoring it - hard to not notice it, but I'm betting (ha!) they're still as confident as ever. Got Oregon last night at +115; +105 this morning.

Go Ducks!

[No coincidences]

You think oddsmakers would allow sharps to scalp like this?

[No coincidences]

i personally don't really give a f\*\*k. i knew i'd come over here and see that you'd posted some line move mess about this game.

I'll put you in the "ignore" column then.

I'm not playing the game personally -- I'd take Oregon if I had to. That's some major line movement, though.

[artie81]

Roll tide

[KGambler]

Let's be honest... SECuares would take Auburn -6.5 in a heart beat.

[SWBET]

I like the under more than either team here

[FindTheLock]

Let's be honest... SECuares would take Auburn -6.5 in a heart beat.

and they probably win too

[texhooper]

I'll put you in the "ignore" column then.

I'm not playing the game personally -- I'd take Oregon if I had to. That's some major line movement, though.

hahaha yeah man, i am ignoring it.

thing is, i would usually use something like this to factor in a play (used it last night for bc, actually) but this is the national championship and i have my feelings and thoughts and i'm not allowing anything to dissuade me. i mean, i'd feel like shit if i had a real opinion, let the line dissuade me, then auburn romps to the finish. i'd have to wait like 7 and a half months to rectify it.

[ROYAJA8]

Oregon ducks all the way. Quack quackquack

[No coincidences]

hahaha yeah man, i am ignoring it.

thing is, i would usually use something like this to factor in a play (used it last night for bc, actually) but this is the national championship and i have my feelings and thoughts and i'm not allowing anything to dissuade me. i mean, i'd feel like shit if i had a real opinion, let the line dissuade me, then auburn romps to the finish. i'd have to wait like 7 and a half months to rectify it.

Good luck.

I wouldn't be surprised at all by any outcome tonight, frankly. Auburn, Oregon, over, under....nothing would shock me unless it finishes like 14-7.

[cspurs]

how can Bodog be at 3 and Bookmaker be at pk.???

[aman86]

lets go auburn get this money

[KGambler]

how can Bodog be at 3 and Bookmaker be at pk.???

Bodog caters to square action. Bookmaker does not. If Bodog puts the game as pick, they will get an incredible imbalance of Auburn bets.

[shaggy3000]

i really dont care about line movement to be honest. and not sure what an SECuares is but if its the guy thats betting on the conf thats own the BCS the last 5+ years then id love to be one of those. but what do you say about the Oregon +.5 ( +110 ) Auburn -.5 ( -130 ) lines? i mean if youre following vig

[KGambler]

but what do you say about the Oregon +.5 ( +110 ) Auburn -.5 ( -130 ) lines?

Wat?

[Rapscallion]

how can Bodog be at 3 and Bookmaker be at pk.???

+3 makes it much easier to take Oregon....... Cam Newton is a unique player to the college ranks. Other Heisman winners like Reggie bush etc., don't compare to this physical specimen. Truly a man amongst boys. I like the resolve of Auburn on the SEC trail this year. Let's test the ducks with a quality opponent outside of raucious Eugene. Good Luck to you guys.

[montoronto]

go oregon!

[samdapatriotsfan]

I am not sure who to take, although I am leaning toward ORE or the Under.

GL to all bettors.

[bruce0]

Bodog caters to square action. Bookmaker does not. If Bodog puts the game as pick, they will get an incredible imbalance of Auburn bets.

Could it be that Bodog is taking a side?

[Pin Fish]

uhhhhhhhh...anyone remember the MTSU/OHIO LINE MOVEMENT.....................

[oChRoNiCo]

Even the sharps are wrong once in awhile!

[No coincidences]

Auburn is +100 now on the ML.

This is insane. There's no way Vegas would allow scalping like this. No way.

[KGambler]

Could it be that Bodog is taking a side?

No.

They are always shaded toward the public side. It is true of every big game.

Listen, just because Auburn is the public/square pick, it does not mean it is the wrong play. Sometimes the squares are right.

The key is that the SECuares would take Auburn -6.5 in a heartbeat. That really shows how biased they are. I lean Oregon here, but it will not be a big bet for me. I have Oregon +3 -105, Oregon +3 -130 (thanks bodog, it's Auburn -3 +142 on Matchbook) and OR ML +120. I will now hedge most of it off.

[broadway6]

i need a bodog account. Oregon is +3

[tylerguy02]

I effin hate Bodog. The only time they allow you to buy points if the spread has 1/2 on it and they don't put MLs until the day of games and only on ones they don't have a big dog so they don't lose money if it hits.

[yisman]

No.

They are always shaded toward the public side. It is true of every big game.

Listen, just because Auburn is the public/square pick, it does not mean it is the right play. Sometimes the squares are right.

You mean does not mean it is the wrong play?

I agree.

I also think these threads are silly.

Just because there's late line movement one way doesn't mean you can only take one side.

It's something to take into account, that's all.

[KGambler]

Sorry, was in a rush when I made that post...

To add a little more info... Bodog has very low limits and caters to square action. They also deal dual lines. If you are on the "square lines" you can get Oregon +3 -125. If you are on the "sharp lines" than it will be OR +3 -130. Of course, "sharp lines" is relatively speaking.

Bodog's limits for this game are $2K for the full game and $500 for half and quarter bets. Those are tiny limits for a game of this magnitude. Bodog is a very conservative book and would not want to take a side here. Hell, they won't even open up their limits for the BCS title game!

[KGambler]

You mean does not mean it is the wrong play?

I agree.

I also think these threads are silly.

Just because there's late line movement one way doesn't mean you can only take one side.

It's something to take into account, that's all.

Yes, sorry. I edited it now. I was in a real hurry when making that post. Also said things like I had OR -3 (minus) lol. Fixed now...

Yeah, I don't base my picks on which side is the public side. I do not auto-fade the public. I don't think that alone is a winning strategy. If I really like a play, and I have not bet yet, I am more than happy to place the bet at a better line.

[shaggy3000]

Even the sharps are wrong once in awhile!

theyre wrong like 40% of the time.

[shaggy3000]

Wat?

its the line and vig ATS at my book and im assuming several other books