[fishmonger]

That Hawaii and UNLV is going to bury the forum. Anyone else feel the same way? Haven't seen many backers for the dogs and line keeps moving up. It seems like it is so square to take the favs in this spot.

[CBASS]

That Hawaii and UNLV is going to bury the forum. Anyone else feel the same way? Haven't seen many backers for the dogs and line keeps moving up. It seems like it is so square to take the favs in this spot.

Agreed

[Outhouse Tim]

Don't know about UNLV vs. the Wisky power run attack, but Hawaii has an excellent cover shot.

[ACCBlitz]

Teasing down USC by at least a TD is an option, otherwise I'm not touching it. The Wisconsin game on the other hand - they'll beat the pants off UNLV.

[BigdaddyQH]

USC is a total unknown and anyone wagering on, or fading them is just rolling the dice at this point. Wisconsin easily wins the game at UNLV, but what concerns me is a back door cover.

[CBASS]

USC is a total lunknown and anyone wagering on, or fading them is just rolling the dice at this point. Wisconsin easily wins the game at UNLV, but what concerns me is a back door cover.

Great points here!

[SoonerBS]

I don't guess I'll be getting points from CBASS in this thread, but I will be cashing my ticket on USC after Thursday night's game. I have given reasons on this forum and to the end of the web on why USC is a good bet, but I have yet to hear anyone give me a good case as to why Hawaii should be a good bet.

Any takers?

Fishmonger, that bad feeling you got is probably gas. Take a Gas X or fart . . . . .

[TWEETS]

Best thing I've seen about Hawaii is that USC isn't quite as good as they have been, so maybe the beatdown is only 40 instead of 60.

[kalamity85]

Best thing I've seen about Hawaii is that USC isn't quite as good as they have been, so maybe the beatdown is only 40 instead of 60.

this. i don't think USC has the firepower to score 60 but i can see scoring 42 or so. the USC defensive front 7 will crush the hawaii O-line and give no time for the hawaii QB to throw.

[The Madcap]

If I've learned anything over the years, it's that Lane Kiffin sucks and that flight out to Honolulu saps the blow-out from incoming favs. USC lost a lot. And I think the Trojans figure they'll win by at least 5 TD's with no effort. I think the Warriors sense it, and sneak up on them early with a couple of quick scores. Then USC wakes up, pounds them on the ground, and runs up a convincing score, but not before the clock runs out on them covering the spread. Taking Hawaii.

[TWEETS]

USC has won previous 3 meetings by an average of 43 points and covered in all 3. I think they are down but a down year for USC is better than a good year for Hawaii. 3 TD's is just to generous.

[bmsOHST11]

I think Lane is going to have the foot on the pedal the whole game the whole season, they are shut out of one poll, shut out of a bowl game... so the only thing they have is the team in front of them... watch the blood fly... I see SC wrecking everyone they can get their hands on.. and when they are up they will continue to score... the defense will be very good and emergence of some wr's the offense could be solid. But it comes back to the proving themselves the 12 games is all they got... and I would expect them to make the most of it... Just my opinion

[fishmonger]

Dam. I guess Hawaii buried the forum. When it looks too easy it is never too easy. Sorry USC backers, your defense was shit and you should of known that.

[fishmonger]

I guess my feeling was right. At least for the people that got bad lines for the UNLV game. I lucked out on UNLV and got the push.

[The Madcap]

Lucked out? Wisconsin blew that cover harder than Katie Holmes does to keep getting acting jobs.

[CLASSIC ROCK]

games involving Hawaii and UNLV are always suspicious. Dirty deals usually happen