Singled out on a Saturday, with a remarkable streak in play, Army-Navy will go down as one of the most heavily bet regular-season college football games ever at U.S. sportsbooks, with tens of millions of dollars at stake across the nation.
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
12-13-21 05:52 PM #1
Army/Navy Game Broke every college football betting record possible
-
12-13-21 05:55 PM #2
I would think opposite
most watching this one were just fans
-
12-13-21 05:57 PM #3Forever in Debt to your Priceless Advice
Become A Pro!
Join Date: 06-30-08Posts: 45,360Betpoints: 8792
Favorite losing outright killed the public for certain
-
12-13-21 06:05 PM #4
Gold took Army ML at huge juice, let's not forget that before he drops his "knowledge" on us
-
12-13-21 06:08 PM #5
Sportsbooks got hurt on the total
-
12-13-21 06:23 PM #6
Of course. They need to start posting this gm at 30-31
Originally Posted by jjgold
-
12-13-21 06:24 PM #7
Army/Air Force went to OT and they only scored 35.
-
12-13-21 06:31 PM #8
No surprise.... if there's only one fat girl at the bar at closing she's going to get lots of attention.
-
12-13-21 06:50 PM #9
Public won HUGE on the Under, that "remarkable streak in play". Under now 15-0 last 15 Army/Navy games and 41-9 last 50 Armed Forces games.
-
12-13-21 07:59 PM #10
Total killed the books far greater than the side
-
12-13-21 08:12 PM #11
-
12-13-21 11:19 PM #12
I was there! Originally Posted by mtofell
-
12-13-21 11:45 PM #13
There was 48 points in 10 and 11. You are saying those both went under? Someone else said it was 17 straight before the game. I was trying it look it up myself but I could only confirm 6 straight. Originally Posted by LT Profits
-
12-14-21 12:43 AM #14
Navy was one of highest scoring teams in the nation in that era lots of totals in the 70's vs other teams Originally Posted by thetrinity
-
12-14-21 12:47 AM #15
Fat bottom girls make the rockin' world go round. Originally Posted by mtofell
-
12-14-21 12:54 AM #16
Not necessarily true. I have a lot of friends who are new at gambling.... and the low total made them take the over. Some people just don't look at stats between 2 teams. You set a total at like 35... people just take the OVER because it looks so low. Originally Posted by LT Profits
-
12-14-21 01:30 AM #17
Or as I like to say "It's 35 for a reason" Originally Posted by TheMoneyShot
-
12-14-21 04:22 AM #18
And they help re-populate the Earth with bald fat people that have low IQ's. Don't forget! Originally Posted by stevenash
-
12-14-21 05:26 AM #19
Take the good with the bad. Originally Posted by hehfest
That's the facts of life, the facts of life.
-
12-14-21 06:18 AM #20
This is a good point. If you just look at their ppg the total should have been around 50 actually. They will always get into some shootouts yearly because a bad run defense will give up big plays against them and their own defense can’t stop any decent offense. The only way this will go over is special team help or short fields from turnovers. Just look at this site. Every post on a total is the over. Originally Posted by TheMoneyShot
-
12-14-21 06:38 AM #21
Yep. Total was 55. And it was 15-0 BEFORE last week (see below) so now 16-0 last 16. Originally Posted by thetrinity
Betting On Home Team Visitor Team Home Score Visitor Score Event Date Odds Result Units Won Season Visitor Team Home Team Over / Under Season Type Under Army Navy 15 0 12/12/2020 36 W 90.9 2020-21 Navy Army Under Regular Under Navy Army 31 7 12/14/2019 41.5 W 92.6 2019-20 Army Navy Under Regular Under Army Navy 17 10 12/8/2018 38.5 W 86.2 2018-19 Navy Army Under Regular Under Navy Army 13 14 12/9/2017 44 W 93.5 2017-18 Army Navy Under Regular Under Navy Army 17 21 12/10/2016 47.5 W 93.5 2016-17 Army Navy Under Regular Under Navy Army 21 17 12/12/2015 51 W 94.3 2015-16 Army Navy Under Regular Under Navy Army 17 10 12/13/2014 55.5 W 100 2014-15 Army Navy Under Regular Under Navy Army 34 7 12/14/2013 49.5 W 104 2013-14 Army Navy Under Regular Under Army Navy 13 17 12/8/2012 55.5 W 95.2 2012-13 Navy Army Under Regular Under Navy Army 27 21 12/10/2011 55 W 97.1 2011-12 Army Navy Under Regular Under Army Navy 17 31 12/11/2010 52 W 90.9 2010-11 Navy Army Under Regular Under Navy Army 17 3 12/12/2009 41.5 W 95.2 2009-10 Army Navy Under Regular Under Army Navy 0 34 12/6/2008 43 W 89.3 2008-09 Navy Army Under Regular Under Navy Army 38 3 12/1/2007 64 W 95.2 2007-08 Army Navy Under Regular Under Navy Army 26 14 12/2/2006 50 W 92.6 2006-07 Army Navy Under Regular
-
12-14-21 06:43 AM #22
Should have included 2005 went Over at 42-23 with Total 50, so streak did indeed start in 2006
-
12-14-21 06:44 AM #23
But this streak was so highly publicized before the game it was practically impossible to escape it. Originally Posted by TheMoneyShot
-
12-14-21 07:01 AM #24
This is also a good point. However, every USA site is always geared to points. Their same game parlays often only have one side of a bet based on scoring happening. Crookstool bets overs with some blonde bimbo and has the overs tournament. These sites are pushing players to where they want to go anyways. One of the pa books had a promo for points be scored on this very game, 2 dollars per point free play. You don’t think that pushes players to the over? Everything at USA books is geared to scoring, much more than the offshores ever did. Originally Posted by LT Profits
-
12-14-21 07:33 AM #25
Reply With Quote
