Originally Posted by
Cuse0323
Again, you’re inflating one side and not doing the same for the other. Except inflating the negative. So, even worse. Bama can do wrong, and Clemson only does right because others are weak.
Lawrence is to Clemson over Bryant as Tua is to Alabama over Hurts. Dual threat or not.
Your arguments are basically that everything Bama did matters, but everything Clemson did can be explained easily by looking at their opponents, etc.
You may win, but it ain’t gonna be because Clemson played a weak schedule, their secondary is inconsistent, and they aren’t as good as last year. And so on. Blah, blah.
Line is sharp. I feel much better with the points here.