1. #1
    BigDofBA
    BigDofBA's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-30-09
    Posts: 19,311
    Betpoints: 2005

    The flag on the onsides kick in the UNC/Clemson game....

    That wasn't even close to being offsides. WTF.

    That ref needs to be fired.

  2. #2
    Unwritten Law
    Unwritten Law's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-31-13
    Posts: 2,532
    Betpoints: -1617

    Brutual BS call. Fix was in for Clemson to win today.

  3. #3
    BigDofBA
    BigDofBA's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-30-09
    Posts: 19,311
    Betpoints: 2005

    I was at least expecting the replay to show it being close although they rarely call that if the players are even on the line....

    When the kicker touched the ball, everyone was at least 1 yard behind the line. LMAO. Unreal. What a dumbass ref.

  4. #4
    POOLSIDE
    POOLSIDE's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-06-14
    Posts: 2,839
    Betpoints: 586

    wowowowowowowow

  5. #5
    jimminn
    jimminn's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-23-11
    Posts: 1,174
    Betpoints: 5771

    Why can't a play like that be reviewed? Doesn't make any sense when it definitely was a blown call. Changes have to be made.

  6. #6
    BigDofBA
    BigDofBA's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-30-09
    Posts: 19,311
    Betpoints: 2005

    Quote Originally Posted by jimminn View Post
    Why can't a play like that be reviewed? Doesn't make any sense when it definitely was a blown call. Changes have to be made.
    That was the kind of call that decides a game.

    Why in the hell do we even have replay if that can't be reviewed. You should be able review critical calls like that in the last two minutes.

    UNC had some momentum on offense and that would have given them the ball at mid-field with 2 minutes and three timeouts left.

  7. #7
    POOLSIDE
    POOLSIDE's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-06-14
    Posts: 2,839
    Betpoints: 586

    Who decided we are allowed to review calls that are often strictly opinion (spot of the ball, was it a catch, did the fumble occur a tenth of a second before or after the knee hit the ground, etc) but we are not allowed to review calls that are cut and dry (offsides, was the hike before/after the play clock expired, etc)?

    Idiotic.

  8. #8
    Eddy Munny
    Eddy Munny's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-13-13
    Posts: 14,372
    Betpoints: 24737

    Quote Originally Posted by POOLSIDE View Post
    Who decided we are allowed to review calls that are often strictly opinion (spot of the ball, was it a catch, did the fumble occur a tenth of a second before or after the knee hit the ground, etc) but we are not allowed to review calls that are cut and dry (offsides, was the hike before/after the play clock expired, etc)?

    Idiotic.
    Yeah, for real. It makes no sense. They may as well do away with replay and just go back to football the way it used to be. Sure, there'll be human error, but we get that shit in spades anyways... might as well bolster gameflow without all the stoppages if we are still gonna get games marred by poor officiating.

  9. #9
    dmncnlou
    dmncnlou's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-17-11
    Posts: 924
    Betpoints: 9993

    Goes to show you. The refs are in on this shit!

  10. #10
    funnyb25
    Go Get Laid Man!
    funnyb25's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 07-09-09
    Posts: 39,621
    Betpoints: 25232

    this has happened time after time again this season...what they should do is put the ref on the podium who blew that point blank obvious call and have him explain to everyone on national tv what he saw while the replay rolls....

Top