[Isaiah]

Nice job on going undefeated with your money line picks. It's an interesting strategy to employ for an entire season fraught with the risk of losing a ridiculous amount of your bankroll on one game but you pulled it off.

What do you plan on spending your 13 unit windfall on? Walmart has raised toilet seats on sale http://www.walmart.com/c/kp/toilet-seat-risers. And a nice selection of adult incontinence supplies can be ordered from http://www.northshorecare.com/adult-diapers.html

Hope this helps and again, congratulations.

[Ebe]

Money line parlays are the way to riches

[Isaiah]

[BigdaddyQH]

To clear the record, I wagered whatever it took to win 100 units per week. I won them all. +1300 units. Now if one of my units is worth $1.00, I won $1300.00. If it is worth $10.00, I won $13,000.00. You get the drift.

The problem with you guys in here is that you are all cowards. You are afraid to take an obvious winner just because you have to lay big money. You keep thinking: "What if I lose?" This tells me a few things about you. First, you do not have the money to lose. I am sure that I have more than any 5 players in here added up. Hell it could be 50 for all I know. But the undeniable fact is that you have to have money to make money. I have not seen any evidence of that being the case in here. No one has demonstrated the understanding of that simple economic principal.

Next. You do not know enough about the College game to wager confidently. One of my rules is that I always wager on away favorites. Why away teams? The answer is simple. Away teams stick to business. They do not get involved in all of the pregame hoopla that home teams do. Let's look at this past season. Alabama lost one game. It was at home. Ohio State lost one game. It was at home. Baylor was 8-0 before suffering their first loss, at home. Memphis lost it's first game after winning 8 in a row, at home. Michigan lost it's first game of the year to Utah at Utah. It's last two losses came at home. The list goes on.

Finally, you always wager on a team that must win for a reason. Whether it is to remain undefeated, win a division championship, or simply qualify for a bowl game, the team needs something to play for besides the old "pride" element which rarely works. So you really need to know your football. Know your teams. Know their record in various situations. Know their talent level. It takes all of that to do what I did. And remember the most important thing. Be able to afford to lose in case something does not break your way. If you can't afford to lose, do NOT wager.

[Microbetter]

It is still a crap strategy to bet a lot of ML bets. If you would have lost one bet, it would take you 4 winners just to break even. (Your Tulsa bet ie.). You always claim to be all that. Show one ticket from the sportsbook, if it exist. I think your an air better.

[BeeFree]

what a friggin dummy you are no wonder the rx banned you just sayin

[chilidog]

To clear the record, I wagered whatever it took to win 100 units per week. I won them all. +1300 units. Now if one of my units is worth $1.00, I won $1300.00. If it is worth $10.00, I won $13,000.00. You get the drift.

Well if your unit amount is anything like your poker wagers, then your units are worth $0.36 each. Congrats, you won $468. Whoop-de-fukking-doo.

http://www.sharkscope.com/#Player-St...ers/BigdaddyQH

[2daBank]

To clear the record, I wagered whatever it took to win 100 units per week. I won them all. +1300 units. Now if one of my units is worth $1.00, I won $1300.00. If it is worth $10.00, I won $13,000.00. You get the drift.

The problem with you guys in here is that you are all cowards. You are afraid to take an obvious winner just because you have to lay big money. You keep thinking: "What if I lose?" This tells me a few things about you. First, you do not have the money to lose. I am sure that I have more than any 5 players in here added up. Hell it could be 50 for all I know. But the undeniable fact is that you have to have money to make money. I have not seen any evidence of that being the case in here. No one has demonstrated the understanding of that simple economic principal.

Next. You do not know enough about the College game to wager confidently. One of my rules is that I always wager on away favorites. Why away teams? The answer is simple. Away teams stick to business. They do not get involved in all of the pregame hoopla that home teams do. Let's look at this past season. Alabama lost one game. It was at home. Ohio State lost one game. It was at home. Baylor was 8-0 before suffering their first loss, at home. Memphis lost it's first game after winning 8 in a row, at home. Michigan lost it's first game of the year to Utah at Utah. It's last two losses came at home. The list goes on.

Finally, you always wager on a team that must win for a reason. Whether it is to remain undefeated, win a division championship, or simply qualify for a bowl game, the team needs something to play for besides the old "pride" element which rarely works. So you really need to know your football. Know your teams. Know their record in various situations. Know their talent level. It takes all of that to do what I did. And remember the most important thing. Be able to afford to lose in case something does not break your way. If you can't afford to lose, do NOT wager.

It takes all that to pick one -800 fav a week? Lmfao, my bitch can take one huge fav a week to win, of course she knows more about football and way more about finance than you ever will. You nothing but a fat blowhard bitch, 3 fuckin paragraphs to explain the nuances of laying -500 or more chalk, do you ever read your pathetic post and laugh as hard as I do?

[2daBank]

Well if your unit amount is anything like your poker wagers, then your units are worth $0.36 each. Congrats, you won $468. Whoop-de-fukking-doo.

http://www.sharkscope.com/#Player-St...ers/BigdaddyQH

Big baller. Lmao

[GoBlue23]

Well if your unit amount is anything like your poker wagers, then your units are worth $0.36 each. Congrats, you won $468. Whoop-de-fukking-doo.

http://www.sharkscope.com/#Player-St...ers/BigdaddyQH

Buried

[Renegades]

If every team won the games that were must win then they would never be in must win situations. Anyways, I'll give you credit for going undefeated but is it even worth it? 4 months of football for 13 ml winners?? Mind as well just do something else with your time

[ShogunRua]

To clear the record, I wagered whatever it took to win 100 units per week. I won them all. +1300 units. Now if one of my units is worth $1.00, I won $1300.00. If it is worth $10.00, I won $13,000.00. You get the drift.

The problem with you guys in here is that you are all cowards. You are afraid to take an obvious winner just because you have to lay big money. You keep thinking: "What if I lose?" This tells me a few things about you. First, you do not have the money to lose. I am sure that I have more than any 5 players in here added up. Hell it could be 50 for all I know. But the undeniable fact is that you have to have money to make money. I have not seen any evidence of that being the case in here. No one has demonstrated the understanding of that simple economic principal.

Next. You do not know enough about the College game to wager confidently. One of my rules is that I always wager on away favorites. Why away teams? The answer is simple. Away teams stick to business. They do not get involved in all of the pregame hoopla that home teams do. Let's look at this past season. Alabama lost one game. It was at home. Ohio State lost one game. It was at home. Baylor was 8-0 before suffering their first loss, at home. Memphis lost it's first game after winning 8 in a row, at home. Michigan lost it's first game of the year to Utah at Utah. It's last two losses came at home. The list goes on.

Finally, you always wager on a team that must win for a reason. Whether it is to remain undefeated, win a division championship, or simply qualify for a bowl game, the team needs something to play for besides the old "pride" element which rarely works. So you really need to know your football. Know your teams. Know their record in various situations. Know their talent level. It takes all of that to do what I did. And remember the most important thing. Be able to afford to lose in case something does not break your way. If you can't afford to lose, do NOT wager.

This is comedic gold.

Well if your unit amount is anything like your poker wagers, then your units are worth $0.36 each. Congrats, you won $468. Whoop-de-fukking-doo.

http://www.sharkscope.com/#Player-St...ers/BigdaddyQH

[saints1856]

you always wager on a team that must win for a reason. Whether it is to remain undefeated, win a division championship, or simply qualify for a bowl game, the team needs something to play for besides the old "pride" element which rarely works.

Just because a team NEEDS to win, doesn't mean they will. I've been betting for a long time and you always take into consideration the motivation factor behind each team.

U-Kansas WANTED to win to avoid going winless, they didn't.
U-Missouri WANTED to win to get Pinkel bowl eligible, they didn't.
My poor Saints wanted to keep their win streak going and have a winning record - they lost to a rookie QB and the Titans a few weeks back.

It aint about the X's and O's, its about the Willie's and Joe's. Some players don't have the same motivation as the TEAM, and that can cause you to lose.

And in the end, it's all still gambling.

[TheSchafe]

We've got some real detectives here lol. Nice season bigdaddy

[Tboonepickem]

Well if your unit amount is anything like your poker wagers, then your units are worth $0.36 each. Congrats, you won $468. Whoop-de-fukking-doo.

http://www.sharkscope.com/#Player-St...ers/BigdaddyQH

WOW

[GT21Megatron]

Well if your unit amount is anything like your poker wagers, then your units are worth $0.36 each. Congrats, you won $468. Whoop-de-fukking-doo.

http://www.sharkscope.com/#Player-St...ers/BigdaddyQH

lmfao

[Killer_Demo]

Quit lying big douche. You bet .38 cent you lying old fukk. Go get my towel!

[Vinnie Paz]

Of course the coward big daddy nowhere to be found now

[jtoler]

Never seen anyone brag about -600 favs, somehow qh managed to brag about it all season long. And on top of that has the nerve to imply betting on such odds displays football knowledge and takes guts, when in fact the opposite is true.

[2daBank]

Never seen anyone brag about -600 favs, somehow qh managed to brag about it all season long. And on top of that has the nerve to imply betting on such odds displays football knowledge and takes guts, when in fact the opposite is true.

yea it takes about as much guts as talking tough on the internet where it safe, and we all know he a big fan of pretending to be tough

[gojetsgomoxies]

i am going to go the opposite of most of the posters here....

I think it is impressive to do that

one key question,

average MLine and range? I realize it would just be guesses probably

I like your "have to win" theory and your road theory.... I would take "have to win" as conf champion and/or playoff. NOT "bowl eligible" or "avoid winless". anyway, those latter team are seldom large FAVES late in year

lastly I don't like your betting math.... 100 units = your bankroll unless you are borrowing money. and no one will lend u 11x your equity, for example... so if you are doing -1200 on average, you are winning 8.333 units per week.....

I do like the theory though

[Vegas39]

yea it takes about as much guts as talking tough on the internet where it safe, and we all know he a big fan of pretending to be tough

Bigbear would win a fight with littlepussy QH

[gojetsgomoxies]

meant to add a bit more stuff (comment and questions):

2 big "had to wins" that missed that I distinctly remember: WV vs. pitt (pat white was out though), okla beat by OKS probably 12 years ago or so......OHS this season too I guess

two questions: 1) do you differentiate power programs (ala, ohs etc.) from excellent up-down programs (OKS, TCU, Miami, GT etc.) having a great year; 2) look at quality of opponent? (i.e.OHS -14 vs. Michigan State)..

[Isaiah]

He used the "they have nothing to play for" bromide all season. As well as the equally trite "they need this win to keep their bowl
hopes alive". Vacuous platitudes you'd expect from an amateur polemicist attempting to justify his preconceived conclusion, not a serious sports handicapper.

For example here's his analysis of the Air Force/Colorado State game:

Air Force vs Colorado State
"So we have a 3-2 Air Force team looking to run off 4 wins in a row to insure themselves a bowl bid at a 2-4 Colorado State team looking for the season to end. Air Force is 3-1 ATS in their last 4 games and 6-2 in their last 8 efforts against Colorado State. So why did the linesmakers make this a pick 'em? It looks like a gift to me"

If you dissect his "analysis" the exact same logic could have been applied to Colorado State needing this game to insure themselves a bowl bid considering they had 6 games left and needed to win at least 4 of them. And no, Colorado State wasn't "looking for the season to end" witness the fact that they won 5 of their next 6 games.

His"gift" lost 38-23 in a drubbing that was even worse than the score indicates.

Colorado State 2015 SCHEDULE & RESULTS

Date Opponent Closing Line Total Result ATS Sep 5 Savannah State Tigers -51 65 Won 65 - 13 Win / Over Sep 12 Minnesota Golden Gophers 3.5 60 Lost 20 - 23 Win / Under Sep 19 Colorado Buffaloes 3 56 Lost 24 - 27 Push / Under Sep 26 @ Texas-San Antonio Roadrunners -9 56 Won 33 - 31 Loss / Over Oct 3 @ Utah State Aggies 5.5 50 Lost 18 - 33 Loss / Over Oct 10 Boise State Broncos 15.5 60 Lost 10 - 41 Loss / Under Oct 17 Air Force Falcons 3.5 54 Won 38 - 23 Win / Over Oct 31 San Diego State Aztecs 3 51 Lost 17 - 41 Loss / Over Nov 7 @ Wyoming Cowboys -9.5 55 Won 26 - 7 Win / Under Nov 14 UNLV Rebels -7.5 59 Won 49 - 35 Win / Over Nov 21 @ New Mexico Lobos -3 56 Won 28 - 21 Win / Under Nov 28 @ Fresno State Bulldogs -10.5 60 Won 34 - 31 Loss / Over

[Killer_Demo]

He used the "they have nothing to play for" bromide all season. As well as the equally trite "they need this win to keep their bowl
hopes alive". Vacuous platitudes you'd expect from an amateur polemicist attempting to justify his preconceived conclusion, not a serious sports handicapper.

For example here's his analysis of the Air Force/Colorado State game:

Air Force vs Colorado State
"So we have a 3-2 Air Force team looking to run off 4 wins in a row to insure themselves a bowl bid at a 2-4 Colorado State team looking for the season to end. Air Force is 3-1 ATS in their last 4 games and 6-2 in their last 8 efforts against Colorado State. So why did the linesmakers make this a pick 'em? It looks like a gift to me"

If you dissect his "analysis" the exact same logic could have been applied to Colorado State needing this game to insure themselves a bowl bid considering they had 6 games left and needed to win at least 4 of them. And no, Colorado State wasn't "looking for the season to end" witness the fact that they won 5 of their next 6 games.

His"gift" lost 38-23 in a drubbing that was even worse than the score indicates.

Colorado State 2015 SCHEDULE & RESULTS

Date Opponent Closing Line Total Result ATS Sep 5 Savannah State Tigers -51 65 Won 65 - 13 Win / Over Sep 12 Minnesota Golden Gophers 3.5 60 Lost 20 - 23 Win / Under Sep 19 Colorado Buffaloes 3 56 Lost 24 - 27 Push / Under Sep 26 @ Texas-San Antonio Roadrunners -9 56 Won 33 - 31 Loss / Over Oct 3 @ Utah State Aggies 5.5 50 Lost 18 - 33 Loss / Over Oct 10 Boise State Broncos 15.5 60 Lost 10 - 41 Loss / Under Oct 17 Air Force Falcons 3.5 54 Won 38 - 23 Win / Over Oct 31 San Diego State Aztecs 3 51 Lost 17 - 41 Loss / Over Nov 7 @ Wyoming Cowboys -9.5 55 Won 26 - 7 Win / Under Nov 14 UNLV Rebels -7.5 59 Won 49 - 35 Win / Over Nov 21 @ New Mexico Lobos -3 56 Won 28 - 21 Win / Under Nov 28 @ Fresno State Bulldogs -10.5 60 Won 34 - 31 Loss / Over

I wouldn't look too much into bigdouches numbers. Dude is constantly lying all year. Come out bigdouche and explain your bitch-self

[Killer_Demo]

Well if your unit amount is anything like your poker wagers, then your units are worth $0.36 each. Congrats, you won $468. Whoop-de-fukking-doo.

http://www.sharkscope.com/#Player-St...ers/BigdaddyQH

Where you at bigfraud?

[Ralphie Halves]

BigDaddy's NCAAF knowledge - Pretty good

BigDaddy's betting skills - Horrendous

You would be flat broke if you bet the way you're talking about. You keep saying "This is what the bigtime bettors know that none of you do", blah blah blah.

I know those bettors. They're laughing at you too.

[cant call it]

Well if your unit amount is anything like your poker wagers, then your units are worth $0.36 each. Congrats, you won $468. Whoop-de-fukking-doo.

http://www.sharkscope.com/#Player-St...ers/BigdaddyQH

R.I.P.