[gojetsgomoxies]

freshman/sophomore starting:

South Alabama	5%
UTSA	5%
Utah St	9%
East Carolina	9%
Buffalo	9%
Kansas	9%
Kansas St	9%
Fresno St	9%
San Diego St	9%
UTEP	9%
Purdue	9%
Rice	14%
Oklahoma St	14%
Boston College	14%
Boise St	14%
ULM	14%
Arizona	14%
WKU	14%
New Mexico	14%

Texas Tech	36%
Marshall	36%
Duke	36%
Arkansas St	36%
Minnesota	36%
Temple	36%
Colorado St	36%
Western Michigan	36%
Mississippi	36%
Maryland	36%
Kentucky	36%
Michigan	36%
North Carolina	36%
Nevada	36%
California	36%
UCF	36%
Arkansas	41%
Baylor	41%
Texas A&M	41%
Penn St	41%
West Virginia	45%
Notre Dame	45%
UCLA	45%
TCU	55%
Massachusetts	59%

[gojetsgomoxies]

had a formatting problem but had to split this into the numbers and then my text here.

i played around with phil steele's numbers.

this is % freshmen and sophomore's starting based on starting 22....

i know you can do returning starters, but sometimes it's hard to define who was a starter last year. and anyway, i'm not too concerned with a senior as a new starter anywhere. freshman and sophomores starting is of much more concern.

this % is driven more by sophomores starting than freshmen. fyi, ND, TCU and UMass have more than 10 sophomores starting. WM, olemiss, baylor, psu and umass have 3 or more freshman starting.

some pretty interesting teams at both ends of the list. ECU, buffalo, new mexico on the heavy senior/junior. tcu/ucla/nd/tax on the heavy sophomore/freshman end.

[J_On_A_Roll]

If this is true of Duke Bluedevils, then im pa pa POUNDING!!!!!

[gojetsgomoxies]

If this is true of Duke Bluedevils, then im pa pa POUNDING!!!!!

i think i'm going to cross-check with some other magazines. those % seem high. i'm sure phil isn't wrong, but maybe me in microsoft excel.