1. 09-25-12 11:42 AM #1
    CanuckG
    CanuckG's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-23-10
    Posts: 21,951
    Betpoints: 584

    Washington Huskies +7 and ML +230

    Take a look. People say it's tough to play in Seattle well this game is at Century Link field too.

    Huge game for Washington as they have one of the toughest schedules in the PAC 12 and Stanford coming off a huge upset over USC while only thing the Huskies have done is get shit kicked by LSU.

    Just like the Seahawks the Huskies for some reason play like god at home when facing a decent team....

    This is a coming out game for Keith Price and love this spot for Washington.

    This will come down to a FG most likely....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 09-25-12 11:57 AM #2
    No coincidences
    Baseball at The Corner
    No coincidences's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-18-10
    Posts: 76,300
    Betpoints: 16541

    Like it.

    Paranoid about "balancing out" correction that's coming Canuck. You know what I mean.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 09-25-12 12:01 PM #3
    CanuckG
    CanuckG's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-23-10
    Posts: 21,951
    Betpoints: 584

    True....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 09-25-12 12:03 PM #4
    ngates815
    Hooked Nose J
    ngates815's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-01-09
    Posts: 13,845
    Betpoints: 0

    ehh...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 09-25-12 12:25 PM #5
    Sunde91
    Sunde91's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-26-09
    Posts: 8,325
    Betpoints: 255

    One of the best plays of the year I'd think.

    Stanford won their big early conference opener they had circled all offseason, shot their wad everywhere, now they're in their first road game with a terrible QB first time away from home in the loudest NFL stadium with a College crowd on a Thursday Night. Both teams off a bye. Stanford listened for 12 days about how good they are for beating SC at home in the worst game of Barkley's career.

    Wash has been particularly unimpressive even against SDSU at home is the only concern.

    If Stanford lost by DD to SC, this line is 3 or less. Couldn't draw up a better fade perception letdown spot.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 09-25-12 12:29 PM #6
    CanuckG
    CanuckG's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-23-10
    Posts: 21,951
    Betpoints: 584

    Wash looking bad at home vs SDSU isn't really that bad....as an athlete you can't get more fired up than this. They play USC at home and Huskies are always good for an upset at home and more likely to come vs Stanford...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 09-25-12 02:17 PM #7
    ridims
    ridims's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-15-10
    Posts: 3,863
    Betpoints: 0

    took em at +7.5 still great odds
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 09-25-12 02:22 PM #8
    BigDeem5
    2013-2016 NBA: 461-378-24 +52.65u
    BigDeem5's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-26-11
    Posts: 17,190
    Betpoints: 2158

    Go get em nuker
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 09-25-12 02:35 PM #9
    Trackrec
    Trackrec's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-06-12
    Posts: 46
    Betpoints: 5118

    The latest blow came Monday when Sarkisian announced during his weekly news conference that sophomore guard Colin Tanigawa will be out for the season (apparently with a knee injury). Tanigawa did not play in UW's win over Portland State on Sept. 15 but his status was not clarified until Monday.
    Tanigawa was a starter a year ago, one of four regulars on the 2011 line that projected to return this season.But three are out, two for the season.Joining Tanigawa on the sidelines is junior guard/tackle Erik Kohler, out indefinitely with a knee injury that dates to fall camp and was aggravated against LSU.And lost for good in the spring was junior guard Colin Porter, who was forced to give up football due to chronic shoulder issues.That leaves only senior center Drew Schaefer of the four returners who started last season. The other starter was left tackle Senio Kelemete, now with the Arizona Cardinals.

    http://seattletimes.com/html/huskyfo...ootball25.html

    Stanford -7
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 09-25-12 02:36 PM #10
    gojetsgomoxies
    gojetsgomoxies's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-04-12
    Posts: 4,222
    Betpoints: 8519

    i like the analysis/idea but i think stanford is far superior team. i have to look into wash end. had such a porous D last year
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 09-25-12 02:39 PM #11
    CanuckG
    CanuckG's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-23-10
    Posts: 21,951
    Betpoints: 584

    Quote Originally Posted by Trackrec View Post
    The latest blow came Monday when Sarkisian announced during his weekly news conference that sophomore guard Colin Tanigawa will be out for the season (apparently with a knee injury). Tanigawa did not play in UW's win over Portland State on Sept. 15 but his status was not clarified until Monday.
    Tanigawa was a starter a year ago, one of four regulars on the 2011 line that projected to return this season.But three are out, two for the season.Joining Tanigawa on the sidelines is junior guard/tackle Erik Kohler, out indefinitely with a knee injury that dates to fall camp and was aggravated against LSU.And lost for good in the spring was junior guard Colin Porter, who was forced to give up football due to chronic shoulder issues.That leaves only senior center Drew Schaefer of the four returners who started last season. The other starter was left tackle Senio Kelemete, now with the Arizona Cardinals.

    http://seattletimes.com/html/huskyfo...ootball25.html

    Stanford -7
    Line should be Stanford -13 then right?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 09-25-12 02:53 PM #12
    Trackrec
    Trackrec's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-06-12
    Posts: 46
    Betpoints: 5118

    Quote Originally Posted by CanuckG View Post
    Line should be Stanford -13 then right?
    I don't know if -13 would be the right cap, however this line looks like a gift. I think the line is a false pretense to a tight game
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 09-25-12 11:28 PM #13
    odog11
    It aint easy being greasy.
    odog11's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-13-11
    Posts: 3,861
    Betpoints: 3197

    Thinking under the play here at first glance.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 09-25-12 11:31 PM #14
    paco
    paco's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-07-09
    Posts: 62,873
    Betpoints: 7051

    Washington couldn't stop a nose bleed as Bart would say
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 09-26-12 12:00 AM #15
    BigDeem5
    2013-2016 NBA: 461-378-24 +52.65u
    BigDeem5's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-26-11
    Posts: 17,190
    Betpoints: 2158

    Canuck is Washington homer, but he may be on to something here.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 09-26-12 12:04 AM #16
    Ernie Mccracken
    Ernie Mccracken's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-11-11
    Posts: 1,986
    Betpoints: 4304

    Washington is a very soft team, mentally. Very talented, but frustrating to watch. If they get down by a couple TD's, I would expect them to insta-fold.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 09-26-12 12:22 AM #17
    JMobile
    CM Punk -1000.5 (100X)
    JMobile's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-21-10
    Posts: 19,064
    Betpoints: 26848

    Against Stanford??????
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 09-26-12 12:44 AM #18
    pulledclear
    pulledclear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-19-12
    Posts: 6,684
    Betpoints: 0

    Loved the play until I saw that Deemer liked it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 09-26-12 02:00 AM #19
    PAYTON20
    PAYTON20's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-02-10
    Posts: 5,217
    Betpoints: 770

    God I Hope you're right Canuck
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 09-26-12 07:49 AM #20
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    cannuck are you a homer for washington?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 09-26-12 10:14 AM #21
    freewinners4u
    freewinners4u's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-26-12
    Posts: 20
    Betpoints: 0

    yupp
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 09-26-12 10:26 AM #22
    Smoke
    Smoke's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-09-09
    Posts: 48,111
    Betpoints: 1510

    ....
    Last edited by SBR Jonelyn; 03-10-15 at 11:38 AM. Reason: image does not exist
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 09-26-12 10:28 AM #23
    freewinners4u
    freewinners4u's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-26-12
    Posts: 20
    Betpoints: 0

    they shouuld win big
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 09-26-12 01:15 PM #24
    Snowball
    Snowball's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-15-09
    Posts: 30,021
    Betpoints: 3780

    If you like Washington to play well, then consider the Over 21.5
    instead. Better chance of hitting that, imo.
    I might take Overs in both Team Totals separately.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 09-26-12 02:09 PM #25
    Snowball
    Snowball's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-15-09
    Posts: 30,021
    Betpoints: 3780

    line dropped on TT"s, I just placed my bets...

    taking Wash U Over 20.5
    taking Stanford Over 27

    50% each
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  26. 09-26-12 02:20 PM #26
    Sunde91
    Sunde91's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-26-09
    Posts: 8,325
    Betpoints: 255

    Stanford has a 50% passing QB in his 1st start ever on the road for an offense that is conservative to begin with. Stanford TT Over is terrible. TT Under is maybe a better bet than Wash points
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  27. 09-26-12 02:24 PM #27
    gojetsgomoxies
    gojetsgomoxies's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-04-12
    Posts: 4,222
    Betpoints: 8519

    i stumbled across marc lawrence's weekly tout sheet (i like his preview magazine, not crazy about his angle-based analysis though). anyway, he has washington as 10 point SU winner.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  28. 09-26-12 02:25 PM #28
    zoo youk
    zoo youk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-11
    Posts: 10,701
    Betpoints: 1197

    careful here canuck. i believe stanford is number 1 in nation against the rush if not def top 5 wjth that smashmouth style they love. UW very finess team and they have 5 OL hurt including three starters. price is going to be running for his life all night long
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  29. 09-26-12 02:25 PM #29
    gojetsgomoxies
    gojetsgomoxies's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-04-12
    Posts: 4,222
    Betpoints: 8519

    Quote Originally Posted by zoo youk View Post
    careful here canuck. i believe stanford is number 1 in nation against the rush if not def top 5 wjth that smashmouth style they love. UW very finess team and they have 5 OL hurt including three starters. price is going to be running for his life all night long
    i think stanford has a very good pass rush too.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  30. 09-26-12 02:27 PM #30
    RudyRuetigger
    Leave of absence until March Madness
    RudyRuetigger's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 08-24-10
    Posts: 64,799
    Betpoints: 55

    line agrees, good bet.


    pissed i got stanford -7
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  31. 09-26-12 02:42 PM #31
    gojetsgomoxies
    gojetsgomoxies's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-04-12
    Posts: 4,222
    Betpoints: 8519

    this game is too much of a wildcard. i can see washington winning by 10 or stanford winning by 21 halfway thru the 2nd quarter............. so NO PLAY
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  32. 09-26-12 02:49 PM #32
    zoo youk
    zoo youk's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-23-11
    Posts: 10,701
    Betpoints: 1197

    Quote Originally Posted by gojetsgomoxies View Post
    i think stanford has a very good pass rush too.
    look at the havoc they reeked on the USC OL and Barkley. huge talent gap between SC and UW. imo these guys are gonna be in the backfield all night long
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  33. 09-26-12 03:20 PM #33
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    didn't washington get curb stomped by LSU?

    what makes anyone think they can hang with a team that beat the #1 team in the nation?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  34. 09-26-12 03:22 PM #34
    Big Bear
    Love your neighbor
    Big Bear's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-01-11
    Posts: 43,253
    Betpoints: 14

    if this was on a short week right after the USC game i could see your point. but Stanford has been practicing and studying film and game planning for 10 days.

    there is not a chance that they come out unprepared. these are smart kids too with a good coach. they will not take washington lightly.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  35. 09-26-12 04:03 PM #35
    Snowball
    Snowball's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-15-09
    Posts: 30,021
    Betpoints: 3780

    Quote Originally Posted by Sunde91 View Post
    Stanford has a 50% passing QB in his 1st start ever on the road for an offense that is conservative to begin with. Stanford TT Over is terrible. TT Under is maybe a better bet than Wash points

    then why does Vegas say they score 27 ?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
1234 ... Last
Top
« Previous Thread | Players Talk | Next Thread »