[gojetsgomoxies]

http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2012/Sep12/DBSep05.html

ones that jumped out at me ats (phil's team listed first and most of these that i'm listing are pretty comfortable covers)

just to be clear, he would like the first team mentioned ATS, and then AGREE/DISAGREE is my opinon.

stanford vs. duke DISAGREE but OVER might be better
florida vs. TAM DISAGREE but don't feel confident.
Kansas state vs. miami AGREE
UCLA vs. Nebraska AGREE
UCF vs. Ohio State AGREE
Syracuse vs. USC AGREE
East Carolina vs. SC AGREE

i think one situation i think i have some problems when teams that have historically been good are substantial underdogs to teams that have historically been mediocre (and then i'm probably wrong in thinking missouri has been mediocre. they've actually been pretty good for a fair number of years now. but i remember when they hadn't beaten missouri in years.... same feeling with miami-florida as substantial underdog to K-State, although K-State is good at home and miami is arguably in the middle of a massive decline)

[Barnes & Whine]

Fuk phil Steele and his lame ass picks.

[hubie69]

Fuk phil Steele and his lame ass picks.

You're not aware of who Phil Steele is, are you?

[El Nino]

Thanks for posting this

Do you know how his top 25 projections did ATS?

[gojetsgomoxies]

Thanks for posting this

Do you know how his top 25 projections did ATS?

somone else said poorly week 1... i like the writeups for info and he is influential. don't really tail his picks although i seem to agree with many this week

[hubie69]

somone else said poorly week 1... i like the writeups for info and he is influential. don't really tail his picks although i seem to agree with many this week

Yes, his work makes it much easier for research. I dont recommend tailing his picks but an intelligent decision about specific games can be made when using his research as a tool, along with other items.

His book makes my life much easier, having a lot of info readily available.