[TheCalculator]

Also parlayed all "9" combinations and "10".

11 Team Parlay

$0.68	to win: $1,475.86	Pending
		Pending	4/20/13 9:30pm Props Fighting 1011 Henderson wins by 5 round decision -125* vs Not Henderson by 5 round decision
		Pending	4/20/13 8:30pm Props Fighting 1207 Thomson wins by 3 round decision +190* vs Not Thomson by 3 round decision
		Pending	4/20/13 8:00pm Props Fighting 1304 Fight won't go 3 round distance +115* vs Brown/Mein goes 3 round distance
		Pending	4/20/13 7:30pm Props Fighting 1403 Elkins/Mendes goes 3 round distance -125* vs Fight won't go 3 round distance
		Pending	4/20/13 7:00pm Props Fighting 1503 Carmont/Larkin goes 3 round distance -120* vs Fight won't go 3 round distance
		Pending	4/20/13 6:30pm Props Fighting 1603 Nijem/Jury goes 3 round distance -165* vs Fight won't go 3 round distance
		Pending	4/20/13 6:00pm Props Fighting 1704 Fight won't go 3 round distance -105* vs Uyenoyama/Benavidez goes 3 rnd distance
		Pending	4/20/13 5:30pm Props Fighting 1804 Fight won't go 3 round distance +120* vs Masvidal/Means goes 3 round distance
		Pending	4/20/13 5:00pm Props Fighting 1904 Fight won't go 3 round distance +105* vs Viana/Dillashaw goes 3 round distance
		Pending	4/20/13 4:30pm Props Fighting 2003 Njokuani/Bowling goes 3 round distance -155* vs Fight won't go 3 round distance
		Pending	4/20/13 4:00pm Props Fighting 2105 Romero wins inside distance +152* vs Not Romero inside distance

[sideloaded]

y 68 cents?

[TheCalculator]

I'm into weird digits like that.

[Sacrelicious]

y 68 cents?

I agree, based on my kelly criterion calculations the logical play here was for 79 cents.

Also, why is Fandango not in this parlay?

[TheCalculator]

Yes -- I used 1/32 kelly criterion. But I probably should of used 1/31 -- that would of gotten me 79 phat sents.

[Beelzebubzy]

Would have

thats my ocd pet peeve

[visualrealism]

Would've

That is my ocd pet peeve

[NunyaBidness]

Would've

That is my ocd pet peeve

Are you seriously arguing that would've is grammatically correct over would have?

[gabe]

Are you seriously arguing that would've is grammatically correct over would have?

They're both equally correct

[Beelzebubzy]

Mines is most corrector cause I be speaking good English.

[Hannibal]

They're both equally correct

would've is a contraction
you will not see that in any formal writing, as it is non standard grammar
a few years ago, contractions would have come up as a spelling error in most major word processors

[Sacrelicious]

would've is a contraction
you will not see that in any formal writing, as it is non standard grammar
a few years ago, contractions would have come up as a spelling error in most major word processors

I don't trust word processors. I keep typing "lol" into mine and it comes up as a penetrating typo.

[Hannibal]

if you are opening up a word processor... you should not be typing things with the word "lol"

[Sykes]

This is my crapshoot for tonight.

4/20/2013 7:30 PM UFC Fighting 1402 Chad Mendes* -750 1.133 vs Darren Elkins
4/20/2013 7:00 PM UFC Fighting 1501 Francis Carmont* -135 1.741 vs Lorenz Larkin
4/20/2013 5:30 PM UFC Fighting 1801 Jorge Masvidal/Tim Means* Over 2½ -160 1.625
4/20/2013 4:30 PM UFC Fighting 2001 Anthony Njokuani/Roger Bowling* Over 2½ -185 1.541
4/20/2013 9:30 PM Props Fighting 1009 Henderson wins inside distance* +320 4.200 vs Not Henderson inside distance
4/20/2013 9:00 PM Props Fighting 1133 Cormier wins by TKO/KO* -210 1.476 vs Any other result
4/20/2013 8:00 PM Props Fighting 1309 Mein wins inside distance* +155 2.550 vs Not Mein inside distance
4/20/2013 6:00 PM Props Fighting 1709 Benavidez wins inside distance* +129 2.290 vs Not Benavidez inside distance

Risking $10.00 To Win $1,778.07