Originally Posted by
MD
Being right before doesn't increase my chances of being right in the future, unfortunately for me. As for this case, you should trust yourself, but make more of an effort to educate yourself. If I were you, I'd take two hours, watch some Glover fights, and some Rampage fights (not the Bader one which he was injured in, preferably), and then if you truly think Glover wins at a high enough percentage to justify your bets, let it ride. If not, hedge it. But really watch. Exclude all of the hype, and don't even consider it. Just look at what you're seeing. The conclusions you'll come to will be really straightforward, as both fighters never evolve and largely fight the same way from fight to fight. Glover and Rampage haven't shown any improvement in quite some time, so what you see is what you get. And what I see is a BJJ phenom with a questionable chin and extremely mediocre striking against a straightforward and predictable but skilled boxer with outstanding takedown defence and a great deal of striking experience. You may see differently.