Originally Posted by
DirtyX
Maybe I am just a noob and I am misunderstanding this. Not gonna lie. My point is I believe baseball has too many variables "People" or "external factors" such as weather that one must consider before making a play.
With MMA, it's two guys inside a cage, with one goal, which is to stop the other or to win the decision. I think having to account for 18 people on a field, and how they are all feeling on any given night, night after night, is completely different than MMA, with two people, for 15 or 25 minutes. Also, baseball teams play almost every other day, for months on end, whereas fighters fight twice, maybe three times a year. In MMA, you have two guys who have been doing nothing but training for months for this one night. It's apples and oranges imo.
In baseball, A-Rod and Jeter going 0-5 can change a game, just like if Holiday can't throw strikes and the opposing team hammers him in the first inning, this significantly changes the game.
For me, studying and researching MMA seems much easier, requiring less research and time to be relatively accurate. Match ups, (example - Wrestler vs Boxer or BJJ vs Muai Thai) make the fights, and seeking out these fights is how I have been successful betting MMA, well somewhat successful. I did ok in 2012, nothing special, but I am ahead for the year. I assume the same could be said for any sport, NFL, NBA, etc. However, I believe Baseball to be the most intrecate and the most strategic sport of all, thus making it unfavorable for me betting wise, but that's just my opinion. I would rather have to account for two people instead of 18 people, but I do understand what you are saying and it makes sense.
Thanks for the reply, and schooling me. I really do appreciate it, seriously..