[brooks85]

If you want to lose some betpoints let me know


Offering +1000 that trump will face collusion charges.

[Chi_archie]

what is the limit?

[brooks85]

what is the limit?

high as you want. I'd offer real money but that's against the rules.

[Chi_archie]

I guess I should have asked, what can you currently cover?

[vitterd]

high as you want. I'd offer real money but that's against the rules.

You don’t have real money. Seriously, give up....you look like an idiot every day. Just stop. Log off and re-evaluate your life.

[brooks85]

^lol upset children are always funny

I guess I should have asked, what can you currently cover?

100k but it really doesn't matter. The real question is how much do you want to lose?

[Chi_archie]

^lol upset children are always funny



100k but it really doesn't matter. The real question is how much do you want to lose?

you have 100k points?


Nice!!!!

[jjgold]

They have nothing

FBI offered immunity means they have nothing

Obama did same thing 1 month later but he was in office, secondly its a trivial law they got him on

Whole thing silly

[brooks85]

you have 100k points?


Nice!!!!

you going to bet or what?

[Chi_archie]

you going to bet or what?

well not if I don't know that my bet can't be covered?

looks like you have 300 points

so i'll bet 30 points

[brooks85]

well not if I don't know that my bet can't be covered?

looks like you have 300 points

so i'll bet 30 points

lol I guess that's 30 so far

[Chi_archie]

scared money! lol

I have no opinion on the betting matter. I don't follow politics

only scared that you don't have the betpoints

let's be clear there is no money involved here

[brooks85]

^are you proud of yourself right now? Are you proud of your posts in this thread?

[Chi_archie]

^are you proud of yourself right now? Are you proud of your posts in this thread?

its a weird question

I mean aren't we all pretty embarrassed to be posting here as much as we do?

let's just admit that amongst each other

I have zero proud moments here

zero

[MinnesotaFats]

I will take this bet for your 300 points and you can pay me right now.

Collusion is not a crime. You cannot be charged with collusion specifically.

It's a term used to describe conduct.

There is no federal collusion crime, they are searching for evidence of conduct to influence electoral results, which again, unless some Russian came and punched some ballots, is also not a specific crime (so long as money didn't exceed limits, and other ancelliary rules).

[brooks85]

I will take this bet for your 300 points and you can pay me right now.

Collusion is not a crime. You cannot be charged with collusion specifically.

It's a term used to describe conduct.

There is no federal collusion crime, they are searching for evidence of conduct to influence electoral results, which again, unless some Russian came and punched some ballots, is also not a specific crime (so long as money didn't exceed limits, and other ancelliary rules).

where did I say collusion was a charge?


learn to read

collusion has a definition, look it up. "s" at the end of a word means something, look it up.



"collusion" charge"s" is not one thing now is it?

[2daBank]

its a weird question

I mean aren't we all pretty embarrassed to be posting here as much as we do?

let's just admit that amongst each other

I have zero proud moments here

zero

Lmao. Solid! Smart move making sure op has the points. Guy seems very unstable!!

[brooks85]

its a weird question

I mean aren't we all pretty embarrassed to be posting here as much as we do?

let's just admit that amongst each other

I have zero proud moments here

zero

well you do you

[grease lightnin]

Guys please don’t do it.

He wont be able to pay me what he already owes

[brooks85]

^lol of course the liar shows up who just proved he can't understand what complex words like "and" and "or" mean.

[MinnesotaFats]

where did I say collusion was a charge?


learn to read

collusion has a definition, look it up. "s" at the end of a word means something, look it up.



"collusion" charge(s) is not one thing now is it?

Collusion charges, IE charging someone or persons with collusion.

What did I miss in the wager offered? Seems pretty straight forward. Also seems you don't understand law theory.

If you'd like to try again and cite some other fanciful charges you believe are forthcoming I'd gladly go down the list with you and take your money/ points.

Pay up.

[grease lightnin]

Guys don’t do it. Please.

He already owes me 20k

I was here first.

[2daBank]

All the action today and this dude going on and on about all this stupid shit. Saloon this garbage already.

[brooks85]

^go back to worrying about making $100 this weekend scrub. You have no idea what is going on anyways so stick to what you know.

Collusion charges, IE charging someone or persons with collusion.

What did I miss in the wager offered? Seems pretty straight forward. Also seems you don't understand law theory.

If you'd like to try again and cite some other fanciful charges you believe are forthcoming I'd gladly go down the list with you and take your money/ points.

Pay up.

no actually that is not mean English dictates that meaning of a plural word.

Again, look up the complexity of adding a "s" to the end of a word and get back to me.







If someone faces "murder charges" then what exactly is there charge?

[2daBank]

Guys don’t do it. Please.

He already owes me 20k

I was here first.

He claimed to have 100k points. Lmfao

[jjgold]

I will take this bet for your 300 points and you can pay me right now.

Collusion is not a crime. You cannot be charged with collusion specifically.

It's a term used to describe conduct.

There is no federal collusion crime, they are searching for evidence of conduct to influence electoral results, which again, unless some Russian came and punched some ballots, is also not a specific crime (so long as money didn't exceed limits, and other ancelliary rules).

exactly

thread over

[brooks85]

^lol not a good look for you minnesota, the paid peanut is on your side

[phinfan27615]

Had no idea there were so many lawyers on here, wow!

[grease lightnin]

Collusion charges, IE charging someone or persons with collusion.

What did I miss in the wager offered? Seems pretty straight forward. Also seems you don't understand law theory.

If you'd like to try again and cite some other fanciful charges you believe are forthcoming I'd gladly go down the list with you and take your money/ points.

Pay up.

Brooks, I won’t even make you pay me now, based on this ^^^

We will wait until the investigation is over, or when it is proven that there was collusion for you to pay me.

What a dumbfukk.

There is not one poster on this board that I would make pay under these circumstances....

Except for you!!!!!

[brooks85]

Brooks, I won’t even make you pay me now, based on this ^^^

We will wait until the investigation is over, or when it is proven that there was collusion for you to pay me.

What a dumbfukk.

There is not one poster on this board that I would make pay under these circumstances....

Except for you!!!!!

based on someone bring wrong?

yeah, I'm sure you would use that as an excuse to back out of a bet lol you're an established pos so sounds like your style to me

[MickeyMan]

I’ll take this bet for the max please but you have to post up the 100 k to me.

BOL

[brooks85]

^do you have any history of paying back debts?

[vitterd]

Careful .....Brooksy trying to use word play to get himself out. He’s actually too stupid though. The guy has 3rd grade intelligence

[grease lightnin]

He claimed to have 100k points. Lmfao

He probably does.

But it will be 80k or less soon.

Has anyone other than me and Minnesota actually taken the wager?

Guys, please go easy on him.

[jtoler]

Dont let Skoorb suck you into his mental gymnastics game. He's done this many times before. Of course he doesnt have 100k pts, do you see them? Here is the deal, no matter what any outcome will be, even if a headline read "Trump Admits To Russia Collusion" he will simply go into game mode. Such as embarrassingly giving his definition of collusion and that he doesnt think thats what Trump did. Or even worse, he'll try and redefine multiple words and also twist your previous statements to try and wiggle a "win" out of it somehow. Its a sad sight and hard to watch, but at the same time its hard to look away.