[spider]

same rules as yisman's threads.

use 5D lines.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

MAX WIN 2000 in all markets / per game

TT and F5 max win 500 / per game

Props max win 500 / per game

---------------------------------------------------------------------

WNBA max win 500 / per game


------------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCCER --- max 1000 win all markets / per game

props ------ max 500 to win

------------------------------------------------------------------

UFC / MMA ---------MAX WIN 2000

----------------------------------------------------------

NASCAR ------------ MAX WIN 2000

for all nascar races, pre-race limits will be max win 500,

up till 2 hrs before race time.

at that point the limits will be raised to 2k.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNIS BETS LIMITED TO GRAND SLAM EVENTS ONLY

--------------------------------------------------------------------

MLB Listed pitchers are default.
Change of pitcher/s voids bets.
For action plays (ML only), you must specify, and then you'd get the new line.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

PLEASE MAKE ALL PAYMENTS IN THIS POST (#1)

INCLUDING YISMAN'S SPECIALS

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[Cross]

Chicago Cubs -158, risking 316 to win 200

[SharpAngles]

Reduced Football

Sun 9/10		459 Philadelphia Eagles	-1 -103
1:00PM		460 Washington Redskins	+1 -107

Eagles

515 to win 500

Sun 9/10		457 Jacksonville Jaguars			o38 -105
1:00PM		458 Houston Texans			u38 -105

UNDER

525 to win 500

Sun 9/10		461 Arizona Cardinals	-2½ -105
1:00PM		462 Detroit Lions	+2½ -105

Cardinals

525 to win 500

[yisman]

NFL specials

Dallas for 2k
Rams for 2k

[SportsAce]

NFL Indianapolis / L.A. Rams Over 41.5 (-103)
103 to Win 100

[SharpAngles]

Reduced Football

Sun 9/10		473 Seattle Seahawks		+125
4:25PM		474 Green Bay Packers		-135

Seachickens

347 to win 433

[bobbywaves]

Packers -2.5 -105, win 2,000

[SharpAngles]

NFL Props Football
Carolina Panthers at San Francisco 49ers - Propositions

Sun 9/10		2821 C.Newton pass completions over 19½		+110
4:25PM		2822 C.Newton pass completions under 19½		-140
Sun 9/10		2823 C.Newton passing yards over 240½		+100
4:25PM		2824 C.Newton passing yards under 240½		-130
Sun 9/10		2825 C.Newton throws an interception		-135
4:25PM		2826 C.Newton no interception thrown		+105
Sun 9/10		2827 C.Newton rushing yards over 27½		+105
4:25PM		2828 C.Newton rushing yards under 27½		-135

21

100 to win 110


23

100 to win 100


26

100 to win 105


27

100 to win 105

[SharpAngles]

NFL Props Football

Sun 9/10		3071 SEA total sacks made			o5½ +115
4:25PM		3072 GB total sacks made			u5½ -145

71

100 to win 115

Reduced Football
Reduced Juice - Internet Only
Sun 9/10		473 Seattle Seahawks		+120
4:25PM		474 Green Bay Packers		-130

200 more to win 240 on Seahawks

[USCPHILLYGUY]

2 Team Parlay
						9/10/17 8:30pm NFL Football 477 New York Giants/Dallas Cowboys Under 47½ -127*
						9/10/17 8:05pm MLB Baseball 968 Cleveland Indians -1 -153* vs Baltimore Orioles (J Hellickson - R must Start T Bauer - R must Start

250 / 480

[mr. leisure]

907 LA Galaxy (USA-MLS)

Over 2½ -168

67 win 40

[mr. leisure]

907 LA Galaxy (USA-MLS)

Over 2½ -168

67 win 40

That came out a little weird. That is the game total of both seattle and the L A galaxy , not just LA team total .

[bobbywaves]

Reduced Football

Sun 9/10		473 Seattle Seahawks		+125
4:25PM		474 Green Bay Packers		-135

Seachickens

347 to win 433

200 more to win 240 on Seahawks

Thanks for the instant fade material.

[SharpAngles]

NFL Props Football
New York Giants at Dallas Cowboys - Propositions

Sun 9/10		4171 Total field goals made over 3½		+125
8:30PM		4172 Total field goals made under 3½		-145

OVER

190 to win 237

[SharpAngles]

Thanks for the instant fade material.

This might hurt my feelings coming from someone with half a clue. Thank goodness we don't have that problem here.

Congrats on the constant bailouts by the crooked refs on your supremely square play.

[bobbywaves]

This might hurt my feelings coming from someone with half a clue.

Coming from someone with 1 store purchase in approx 3.5 years.

Congrats on the constant bailouts by the crooked refs on your supremely square play.

Sure, blame the refs for your pathetic bet.

[SharpAngles]

Reduced Football 2nd Half			Spread
Reduced Juice - Internet Only
Sun 9/10		477 New York Giants	+2½ +110
8:30PM		478 Dallas Cowboys	-2½ -120

Giants

200 to win 220

[SharpAngles]

Bobby your trolling is pathetic

[USCPHILLYGUY]

Sharpy how did the refs decide the outcome of the GB / Seattle Game

[SharpAngles]

Idk if you're trolling me like your buddy booby likes to but in case you're not its kind of a hot topic today Philly


That’s what everyone will talk about, the calls that went against Seattle and altered the game.
There was the block in the back penalty on Seahawks defensive end Cliff Avril that took away Nazair Jones’ interception return for a touchdown in the first quarter. Replays showed Avril lightly touched Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers during the return. Former NFL official and FOX rules analyst Mike Pereira questioned the call on Twitter during the game.
In #SEAvsGB they missed the initial foul on Adams. And that was a block in the back on Rodgers? I don't think the play was well-officiated.

On that same play, Seahawks cornerback Jeremy Lane was ejected for throwing a punch after tangling up with Packers receiver Davante Adams. But once again replays at least didn’t show Lane throwing a punch.

Later in the game, on third down from the Packers’ 3-yard line, Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson lobbed a pass to tight end Jimmy Graham in the back of the end zone. The ball sailed over Graham’s head, but Pereira tweeted that he thought the ball was catchable, and it looked as if two Green Bay defenders interfered with Graham.The Seahawks had to settle for a field goal instead.

I agree with @TroyAikman - that ball was catchable in #SEAvsGB.

It’s too easy to blame officials for a loss — those calls were far, far from the only reason the Seahawks lost — but they were big

[bobbywaves]

Bobby your trolling is pathetic

Trolling? I merely thanked you for the fade material.

Coming from a guy who consistently "trolls" my posts.

[bobbywaves]

Rodgers was indeed blocked in the back on INT return, the amount of force behind the illegal block is irrelevant.

Jeremy Lane was rightfully ejected for throwing forearm shots to the head of Davante Adams while he was down.

Not only was Jimmy Graham crackers ball uncatchable, but Jimmy made contact with the defenders as well & could have easily been called for offensive pass interference.

Not sure what game you were watching, but keep blaming the refs for your loss.

[SharpAngles]

NFL Props Football

Sun 9/10		3071 SEA total sacks made			o5½ +115
4:25PM		3072 GB total sacks made			u5½ -145

71

100 to win 115



7 total sacks. Sea 4 and GB 3

[SharpAngles]

Rodgers was indeed blocked in the back on INT return, the amount of force behind the illegal block is irrelevant.

Jeremy Lane was rightfully ejected for throwing forearm shots to the head of Davante Adams while he was down.

Not only was Jimmy Graham crackers ball uncatchable, but Jimmy made contact with the defenders as well & could have easily been called for offensive pass interference.

Not sure what game you were watching, but keep blaming the refs for your loss.

Ok booby I'll listen to you instead of a former NFL VP of officiating.

Youre obviously one of those guys who thinks a bet has to win to be the right play so keep fading me and in the mean time stfu and stop embarrassing yourself. Some guys around here have a clue about football and I guarantee every one of them thinks you're a damn clown.

Enough of this for me so you take the last word with some nonsensical post after this and win in your tiny brain so we can stop trashing the great Mr spiders thread.



P.s sorry spider I can't help myself from once in a while responding to this troll who follows me around. I will do my best to ignore him and not pollute your threads ever again

[bobbywaves]

Ok booby I'll listen to you

Youre obviously one of those guys who thinks a bet has to win to be the right play

Correct, while you're one of those ignorant fools who thinks a lost bet is the right play & the refs fault.

so keep fading me

Will do, that's how I amassed 40k+.

Some guys around here have a clue about football

Some guys here do have a clue about football, unfortunately you're not one of them.

and I guarantee every one of them thinks you're a damn clown.

Nobody has spoken up, to back your guarantee. What gives you the authority to speak on behalf of others?

[USCPHILLYGUY]

Sharpy come on. You're a bright guy but coming off as a pathetic asshole now. You mean the ex head of officiating who's paid by Fox to stir up controversy . If you're banking on 1 TD to win you a game then you don't win much do you? I watched most of that game & thought Seattle's D played great. Was Lane also going to play QB in the 2nd half

is it typical of you to call someone a troll because they just ask a question or merely disagree with your point of view?

[SharpAngles]

Am I in the twilight zone? Minding my own business breaking even in week 1 NFL when some clown says thanks for the fade and I'm the pathetic asshole??? After the game no less! You think this douche would've said a fkn word if the hawks won?

Philly you seem to have a clue most of the time but you're way off here.

[USCPHILLYGUY]

Am I in the twilight zone? Minding my own business breaking even in week 1 NFL when some clown says thanks for the fade and I'm the pathetic asshole??? After the game no less! You think this douche would've said a fkn word if the hawks won?

Philly you seem to have a clue most of the time but you're way off here.

Sharpy I watched pretty much the whole GB game and the officiating had nothing to do with them losing.....my point was that you crying sour grapes over it seemed pathetic.....then insinuating that I was backing "my buddy" made no sense at all as all I was doing was asking for clarification to your post

[bobbywaves]

Am I in the twilight zone? Minding my own business breaking even in week 1 NFL when some clown says thanks for the fade

Again, I merely thanked you. Do you always act like an asshole when someone thanks you?

Maybe you'll think twice now, before trolling my posts chump.

and I'm the pathetic asshole???

[SharpAngles]

				-
114	SharpAngles	4-1-0	80.00 %	W 2	76.5	+3.85	-

				-
793	bobbywaves	3-2-0	60.00 %	W 3	9.5	-0.32	-

Guy can't even beat the prick, no wonder he feels the need to talk when he wins something.

How about you put put some points where your mouth is Booby?

Ill give you a +4 unit handicap for you and me h2h the rest of BTP. How about 3000 points?

[bobbywaves]

You're bragging over week #1, really?

I destroyed both you & the Prick here, obviously DullAngles is nowhere to be found on this elite leaderboard:

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-talk/3199995-congrats-beat-prick-cash-winners-30-000-top-75-a.html

You suck at basic math too, the handicap would be +4.17 to start bet even. I require post up from douchebags such as yourself.

[bobbywaves]

After the game no less!

I wagered 10K on the Packers, as soon as I saw your Seahawks pick. Obviously before the game.

[SharpAngles]

I'm convinced you're a master level troll and I should respect that so this is my final word here to avoid bumping this nonsense further. You started this whole thing bragging about fading my pick which you know is BS and then brag about making 28 dollars. Nobody could make the shit up.

Why dont you accept my wager since you'll destroy me?

And no I will not post up to a known stiff such as yourself (infamous downsouth prop beatdown) we can arrange an escrow if you grow some balls and eat the .17 lol sorry I wasn't so precise.

+4 is so generous just take it.

You make a new post in betpoints forum if you decide to destroy me so we can stop bumping this ruined thread

[SharpAngles]

On second thought your record of excellence has me worried so the offer is now +2.17 units. You're obviously the favorite so this is a fair line. I'm surprised a shrewd gambler such as yourself didn't snatch up all that value I left on the table but thanks for that.

Post a new thread so so we can confirm

[bobbywaves]

Enough of this for me so you take the last word

so this is my final word here to avoid bumping this nonsense further.

On second thought your record of excellence has me worried so the offer is now +2.17 units.

My record of excellence should have you worried.

Backing down from your original offer & unwilling to start our bet even, what a pussy.