[Triple_D_Bet]

Per PM, 9000 points at standard terms. Please repay here

[bobbywaves]

So you're going to loan Ruffles 9k you don't have, when you owe Yis 27k for paying your debt from our challenge. Very responsible of you Tripe.

[Triple_D_Bet]

So you're going to loan Ruffles 9k you don't have, when you owe Yis 27k for paying your debt from our challenge. Very responsible of you Tripe.

You really are a special kind of stupid huh? You weren't embarrassed enough the last time you stuck your nose in one of my loans and ended up being exposed as an ignorant fool, you need to come back for more?

[bobbywaves]

So enlighten us Tripe.....try to argue my spot on assessment of the situation.

Are you denying you owe Yis 27k, which he basically shipped to me on your behalf?

Go ahead & loan Ruffles 9k, when you have a pathetic 2k to your name.

[Triple_D_Bet]

So enlighten us Tripe.....try to argue my spot on assessment of the situation.

Are you denying you owe Yis 27k, which he basically shipped to me on your behalf?

Go ahead & loan Ruffles 9k, when you have a pathetic 2k to your name.

Well let's see here...

1) I actually owed Yis 30k; about 9k of what he lent me went to you, so "he basically shipped to me on your behalf" is wrong

2) When borrowing from Yis, i asked for additional funds to loan to ruffles who I had already planned on lending to, basically guaranteeing his loan. Yis had no problem with it obviously, so there's no concern of irresponsibility as you wrongly imply.

3) I already lent the 9k to ruffles, just getting around to making a thread for it...so your amusement at my seeming inability to lend him 9k is just amusement at your own ignorance, which is nothing unusual for you...wrong again.

So looks like your "spot on" assessment is completely and thoroughly wrong...no surprise to the rest of us though; it seems every time you open your mouth and comment on things you know little to nothing about (loans, poker, odds, basic chance-based system concepts) you prove what an idiot you are. It seems like your only "skill" is you're willing to spend more time proving your an idiot than people are willing to spend correcting you

Twice you've stepped into my loan threads, twice proven to be an ignorant fool...wanna try bumping another one of mine and go for a hat trick??

[bobbywaves]

Let's take a loan from Yis, so I can loan to Ruffles.


Your flawed logic is consistent with your flawed poker play, as it's the reason you lost 29k to me.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Let's take a loan from Yis, so I can loan to Ruffles.


Your flawed logic is consistent with your flawed poker play, as it's the reason you lost 29k to me.

What a surprise, you not understanding a basic concept like guaranteeing a loan

Yawn...we've established you wouldn't know poker skill if it was explained beyond any doubt to you. But just for fun, let's see what even someone as dumb as you has to say about my poker skill:

...Annual leaderboards don't lie.

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/poker/

Don't see you on there for some reason

[bobbywaves]

What a surprise, you not understanding a basic concept like guaranteeing a loan

Yawn...we've established you wouldn't know poker skill if it was explained beyond any doubt to you. But just for fun, let's see what even someone as dumb as you has to say about my poker skill:

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/poker/

Don't see you on there for some reason

Anyone can have a good week, let's see you stay on LB all year. Even you know it's highly unlikely, so you ducked my 2015 challenge.

Talk to me on 12/31/15. Something tells me you'll be silenced, just like you were last New Year's Eve.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Anyone can have a good week, let's see you stay on LB all year. Even you know it's highly unlikely, so you ducked my 2015 challenge.

Talk to me on 12/31/15. Something tells me you'll be silenced, just like you were last New Year's Eve.

Stayed on leaderboard last year pretty easily...aside from that, in your own words: this is the only current year I've played as many dailies as you. So far results are clear, and with new format you stand even less of a chance

For once we agree: same as last year, it's highly likely I'll have better things to do New Year's Eve than trying to keep up with your endless stupidity

[bobbywaves]

LB pretty easily? You weren't on it for the majority of the year & you finished clinging to the bottom.

Even if you played 9 less tourney's as you claim (since it's unproven), there's no way you make up a 2,100+ pt deficit if you played in those 9 tourney's. Your pathetic cash % proves you're lucky to cash in 20% of the tourney's you play, while I led in cashes & cash % the last 2 years.

[Triple_D_Bet]

LB pretty easily? You weren't on it for the majority of the year & you finished clinging to the bottom.

Even if you played 9 less tourney's as you claim (since it's unproven), there's no way you make up a 2,100+ pt deficit if you played in those 9 tourney's. Your pathetic cash % proves you're lucky to cash in 20% of the tourney's you play, while I led in cashes & cash % the last 2 years.

Leaving aside the things you've proven yourself incapable of understanding, you're impressing us all by digging down deep and coming up with even dumber shit to say

[bobbywaves]

Leaving aside the things you've proven yourself incapable of understanding, you're impressing us all by digging down deep and coming up with even dumber shit to say

I only speak truth, backed up by facts.

[Triple_D_Bet]

I only speak truth, backed up by facts.

Only the facts eh? Let's take a look at one of your "facts" shall we?

...Your pathetic cash % proves you're lucky to cash in 20% of the tourney's you play...

So I finished last year with 24,470 points from dailies. Let's assume SBR ran a daily tournament every Monday through Friday, every week (not true, but a worst-case estimate). If that's the case, we'd be looking at 260 dailies; if I'm "lucky to cash in 20%" of these tournaments, that's 52 cashes, for an average of 470 points per cash. So according to your "facts", I average somewhere between 2nd and 1st place every time I cash. In reality, the number of dailies was less than 260, making my points per cash (according to you) even higher). Doesn't seem quite right does it? In fact, it seems like you've drawn a completely false conclusion despite all of the relevant data being readily available, proving yet again that 1) you're too stupid to know that a "fact" isn't a fact just because you think it, and 2) your stupidity is eclipsed only by your certainty that you're not stupid!

You open your mouth, say something stupid and get embarrassed...just stop for a second and let that sink in: most of the time you post something directed towards me, I prove you're an idiot. Even a person of your limited intelligence should be able to recognize the pattern and take the correct actions (shutting up)...lab rats don't take this long to learn their lessons

[bobbywaves]

Typo, 40%.....So your argument is: "hey Waves I'm cashing at a 40% clip, not 20%.

Fact of the matter is, I'm cashing 20% more than you. Which is why I profited 34k from our challenge.

[Triple_D_Bet]

Typo, 40%.....So your argument is: "hey Waves I'm cashing at a 40% clip, not 20%.

Fact of the matter is, I'm cashing 20% more than you. Which is why I profited 34k from our challenge.

Riiiiight....I guess all the other stupid, provably-wrong things you've said were also "typos", right?

I mean, look at what you wrote here: you claim to have made a mistake, and come back with a number that's also incorrect? On top of doubling-down on an easily-disproven premise? So your argument is "Nuh-uh, I'm not stupid...instead of saying (stupid thing 1), I meant to say (stupid thing 2)!"?? Good chat bobbo, but please do your being-a-complete-moron routine somewhere else where we don't have to waste time reading it

[rufflesmuncher]

on a brighter note... 800/9000 paid

[rufflesmuncher]

1/9 paid

[rufflesmuncher]

1640/9000 paid

[rufflesmuncher]

1700/9000 paid

[rufflesmuncher]

2500/9000 paid

[rufflesmuncher]

3200/9000 paid

[rufflesmuncher]

3390/9000 paid

[rufflesmuncher]

3890/9000 paid

[rufflesmuncher]

4290/9000 paid... damn that was long

[rufflesmuncher]

4700/9000

[rufflesmuncher]

5900/9000
paid

[rufflesmuncher]

6600/9000 paid

[rufflesmuncher]

7600/9000 paid

[rufflesmuncher]

8400/9000 paid!!

[rufflesmuncher]

9100/9000 paid

[JAKEPEAVY21]

long road here but good job sticking with it, ruffles

[Triple_D_Bet]

Well done ruffles! We're all square man, good job keeping at it throughout the year

[rufflesmuncher]

Thanks guys! The poker change really screwed me, I would've had this much earlier!