1. #1
    milwaukee mike
    milwaukee mike's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-22-07
    Posts: 26,906
    Betpoints: 7585

    ** someone give me a MASTERS line for 100 pts

    just for shits and giggles, let's flip

  2. #2
    playersonly69
    playersonly69's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-04-08
    Posts: 12,827
    Betpoints: 142

    I want cabrera

    Deal for 100??

  3. #3
    milwaukee mike
    milwaukee mike's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-22-07
    Posts: 26,906
    Betpoints: 7585

    ok lets do it heads up 100-100

    pay after

  4. #4
    playersonly69
    playersonly69's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-04-08
    Posts: 12,827
    Betpoints: 142

    OK


    You got the better odds here, but I love Cabrera

    Can we make the bet for 60 so I dont have to roll anything over?

  5. #5
    milwaukee mike
    milwaukee mike's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-22-07
    Posts: 26,906
    Betpoints: 7585

    scott was favored? I like cabrera too, good luck

    hopefully they go a few holes and give us some excitement

  6. #6
    milwaukee mike
    milwaukee mike's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-22-07
    Posts: 26,906
    Betpoints: 7585

    ok we're confirmed at 60 since tee shots were similar
    Points Awarded:

    playersonly69 gave milwaukee mike 60 SBR Point(s) for this post.


  7. #7
    playersonly69
    playersonly69's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-04-08
    Posts: 12,827
    Betpoints: 142

    Scott would have been about -140 or so


    I thought that I had more points than I did when I saw the post

  8. #8
    milwaukee mike
    milwaukee mike's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-22-07
    Posts: 26,906
    Betpoints: 7585

    no prob po69, 60 is fine

    just wanted ssomething to root for

  9. #9
    playersonly69
    playersonly69's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-04-08
    Posts: 12,827
    Betpoints: 142

    I have the GRANDPA!!



    He will be the FIRST Grandfather to ever win a Masters. Not even Jack was a Gdaddy in 1986

  10. #10
    milwaukee mike
    milwaukee mike's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-22-07
    Posts: 26,906
    Betpoints: 7585

    ooh their balls almost touched

  11. #11
    playersonly69
    playersonly69's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-04-08
    Posts: 12,827
    Betpoints: 142

    If I manage to win, then I will do a 4 team 120 point parlay, well as long as they finish before 7pm

  12. #12
    playersonly69
    playersonly69's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-04-08
    Posts: 12,827
    Betpoints: 142

    Well I wont bet a 4 teamer as i dont like anything in hockey.

    But I am taking Yankees and Yankees under and Spurs I think

  13. #13
    playersonly69
    playersonly69's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-04-08
    Posts: 12,827
    Betpoints: 142

    You should bet the same 120 point parlay MM.

    Yankees
    Yankees under
    Spurs -3.5

  14. #14
    ProPicker713
    METS!
    ProPicker713's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-15-10
    Posts: 6,788
    Betpoints: 17

    Quote Originally Posted by playersonly69 View Post
    You should bet the same 120 point parlay MM.

    Yankees
    Yankees under
    Spurs -3.5
    Ticket#:2026692
    Apr 14 09:30 PM
    Apr 14 08:05 PM
    Apr 14 08:05 PM
    Apr 14 08:04 PM NBA
    MLB

    MLB
    PARLAY (3 TEAMS)
    [715] SAN ANTONIO -3-110
    [978] NY YAN -116
    ( ACTION )
    [978] TOTAL u8½-120 (BALTIM vrs NY YAN)
    ( W CHEN -L / A PETTITTE -L )
    40.00 / 220.69

  15. #15
    ProPicker713
    METS!
    ProPicker713's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-15-10
    Posts: 6,788
    Betpoints: 17

    Wait wtf I just realized Pettitte isn't pitching.

  16. #16
    milwaukee mike
    milwaukee mike's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-22-07
    Posts: 26,906
    Betpoints: 7585

    Quote Originally Posted by playersonly69 View Post
    You should bet the same 120 point parlay MM.

    Yankees
    Yankees under
    Spurs -3.5
    good luck with that

    i have the spurs moneyline -160

  17. #17
    playersonly69
    playersonly69's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-04-08
    Posts: 12,827
    Betpoints: 142

    Why would you take the moneyline with a spread so small???


    You should NEVER take a moneyline if the spread is less than -5. Just take the spread if lower than 5

  18. #18
    ProPicker713
    METS!
    ProPicker713's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-15-10
    Posts: 6,788
    Betpoints: 17

    Buried me PO yet again, Yanks lineup sucks without all the steroids abusers.

  19. #19
    yisman
    yisman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 75,682
    Betpoints: 246162

    http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/players-ta...l#post18394216

    looks like Scott was like -115 to win the playoff

  20. #20
    tto827
    tto827's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-01-12
    Posts: 9,078
    Betpoints: 76

    Quote Originally Posted by playersonly69 View Post
    Why would you take the moneyline with a spread so small???


    You should NEVER take a moneyline if the spread is less than -5. Just take the spread if lower than 5
    Do you have any proof to back that statement up? Or are we just spewing random opinions here?

  21. #21
    ProPicker713
    METS!
    ProPicker713's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-15-10
    Posts: 6,788
    Betpoints: 17

    Yet another jynx by PO. Lesson learned tonight never tail a jynxer.

  22. #22
    tto827
    tto827's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-01-12
    Posts: 9,078
    Betpoints: 76

    Quote Originally Posted by ProPicker713 View Post
    Yet another jynx by PO. Lesson learned tonight never tail a jynxer.
    PO gets pissed when I bring this up, but nothing matches his jinx of Tsonga, came in saying he wish he had the points cause Tsonga was free money at -1150 or whatever he was, needless to say, Tsonga got destroyed.

  23. #23
    ProPicker713
    METS!
    ProPicker713's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-15-10
    Posts: 6,788
    Betpoints: 17

    As soon as he said "
    Why would you take the moneyline with a spread so small???


    You should NEVER take a moneyline if the spread is less than -5. Just take the spread if lower than 5

    " I knew my night was over.

  24. #24
    playersonly69
    playersonly69's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-04-08
    Posts: 12,827
    Betpoints: 142

    Well propicker,


    I never told you to do anything!! I dont feel bad at all! I only told MM to bet 120 points on the parlay and that is nothing

  25. #25
    ProPicker713
    METS!
    ProPicker713's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 12-15-10
    Posts: 6,788
    Betpoints: 17

    Idc anyway, it's just the points I won from you from earlier that I lost.

  26. #26
    playersonly69
    playersonly69's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 01-04-08
    Posts: 12,827
    Betpoints: 142

    Quote Originally Posted by tto827 View Post
    Do you have any proof to back that statement up? Or are we just spewing random opinions here?

    Just spewing facts that I have learned over the past 25 years of gambling. I would NEVER take a favorite of -3 or lower on the moneyline and my numbers show that would extend up to -5. I mean think of about it for tonight. The line was -3 for the last hour of betting. What were the odds that the Spurs win by EXACTLY 1,2 or 3. I can guarantee that the numbers would show that taking -150 instead of -3 are not +EV

  27. #27
    yisman
    yisman's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-01-08
    Posts: 75,682
    Betpoints: 246162

    http://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-tool...-ml-converter/

    -3 (-108) is roughly equivalent to ML -150, and this is based on real data. Push rates.

  28. #28
    milwaukee mike
    milwaukee mike's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-22-07
    Posts: 26,906
    Betpoints: 7585

    Quote Originally Posted by playersonly69 View Post
    Just spewing facts that I have learned over the past 25 years of gambling. I would NEVER take a favorite of -3 or lower on the moneyline and my numbers show that would extend up to -5. I mean think of about it for tonight. The line was -3 for the last hour of betting. What were the odds that the Spurs win by EXACTLY 1,2 or 3. I can guarantee that the numbers would show that taking -150 instead of -3 are not +EV
    Deciding to never do something is pretty closed minded.

    I thought the odds of the spurs winning by exactly 1,2, or 3 were more than the 8% or so necessary to justify taking the money line instead of the spread. I also have futures on lakers making the playoffs so i was hedging some of that.

Top