[runner5k]

Very nice!

[ProPicker713]

[Jrod124]

try lets u parlay the side and total of a tennis match? Sweet

[ProPicker713]

He seen that it was posted and I booked the same parlay at dimes, so his book most likely has the same rules as dimes.

[tto827]

Couldn't follow the match cause my group is apparently challenged, didn't email me a single thing they were supposed to and I had to do an entire group project by myself to be emailed to our professor by midnight (pacific). Nice to come on and see Haas won easily

[tto827]

Sending 554, in your PM's what its for Try.

[ProPicker713]

Try you around? I would like to play the R.Gasquet/M.Baghdatis over.

[trytrytry]

try lets u parlay the side and total of a tennis match? Sweet

no corelated parlays sorry

[trytrytry]

He seen that it was posted and I booked the same parlay at dimes, so his book most likely has the same rules as dimes.

umm no..for example..sometimes Tony screws up and leaves those on so he can free roll you however..
but no corealted parlays as per my rules..I do appreciate your clever attempts however Propicker, I get a good chuckle out of them.


Selections 105 Igor Sijsling* and 107 I.Sijsling Games Won/M.Klizan Games Won* Over are invalid within the same Parlay. Please make a different selection.
Selections 105 Igor Sijsling* and 107 I.Sijsling Games Won/M.Klizan Games Won* Under are invalid within the same Parlay. Please make a different selection.

[ProPicker713]

Wow try you seen me place the wager you could have atleast tell me that it's not good.
You could have told me this before wtf.
You even said good luck.

[ProPicker713]

**** WIN betpoints MENs LAdies TENNIs ATP WTA 2/13 **


lets do it all in one Thread see how that goes!!!


SPECIAL..risk 200+ points in this thread and be in a RANDOM DRAWING for a 20pt FREE play!




ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament - Rotterdam, The Netherlands
SAP Open - San Jose, CA, U.S.A.
Brasil Open 2013 - Sao Paulo, Brazil
WTA - Qatar Total Open - Doha, Qatar


MAx win on favorite 800
Max risk on underdog 800
minimum risk 10
2,3, and 4 team non corelated parlays ACCEPTED on sides or totals (max risk parlay 600)
(note max net profit per any wager is 2200

ONLY bets offered at this link can be played - no doubles and challenge matches as they are not listed.
(sportbet rules for grading 1 set must be completed for match action..entire match for games over unders or set props)

get your up to date line from this LINK. Post your points and Plays in this THREAd. Its ok if the time listed in the link has passed, they dont update the scheduled times..If its a live wager on the LINK you can play it..if anyone noticed a past post of a player please alert me..thanks!

mens
http://www.sportbet.com/lines/tennis_atp

ladies
http://www.sportbet.com/lines/tennis_wta

So explain this.
No and non are 2 different words.

[ProPicker713]

And if that's the case what happen here in this thread post #10?
http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/sbr-points...atp-2-8-a.html

It was great that I lost and you never said anything about that nor refunded, but this bet I won you explain rules now?
Come on bud what kind of book is this.
I mean a warning or something could have been good since you let that other one go and not even refund.

[tto827]

So explain this.
No and non are 2 different words.

They mean the same thing in this case. No correlated parlays can be played, or only non correlated parlays may be played no matter how you read it.

Now as far as your bet goes, I have no idea if side and total are considered correlated in a tennis match, I would assume its like other sports where it's based on the difference between the spread and total. But you took the ML so again I've got no idea.

[ProPicker713]

Read post #47 though TTO.

[ProPicker713]

I mean I got alot of respect for Try for running these books but don't try to cheat someone out a win.

[tto827]

Read post #47 though TTO.

It's between you n try. I dunno enough about tennis betting to say either way. Hopefully you guys figure it out.

[runner5k]

Picker I went back and looked at that previous parlay your talking about and it's not a correlated one from what I see

[ProPicker713]

Runner this one

Llodra -600/Jarkko Nieminen -270/ B.Paire Games Won +3 1/2 -125/ L.Rosol Games Won Over 22½ -135
Risk 50 to win 200.47

It had the total parlayed with ml.
Same as this one in this thread.

[runner5k]

From my results those are 4 different matches

[ProPicker713]

Well wasn't sure about that but still he posted a minute after I posted telling me and tto and the rest of bettors in the thread good luck.
He could have atleast told me that the wager was invalid, I mean the haas match didn't start till 2 hours from when I put in the bet.
I would have just put in on ml.

[runner5k]

Honestly he might not have looked at any wagers and just came to say good luck. He had said he was going out and wasn't gonna grade for a while. I'm sorry I didn't catch it to let you know

[ProPicker713]

He said that 4 and 1/2 hours before I placed the bet that he was going out.
Posted a minute later after I posted the bet "good luck on the LATE MATCHES!"

It's whatever man I don't even care no more just complete garbage.

[tto827]

Sending 554, in your PM's what its for Try.

Try, I sent 554 for the plays via PM that didn't happen. If you could shoot these back when you get a chance please.

[ProPicker713]

So Try will not take no action to replying in thread or the other one.
Not a good way to run a book.

[Jrod124]

Runner this one

Llodra -600/Jarkko Nieminen -270/ B.Paire Games Won +3 1/2 -125/ L.Rosol Games Won Over 22½ -135
Risk 50 to win 200.47

It had the total parlayed with ml.
Same as this one in this thread.

Picker u can't parlay the side and total of the SAME match. That is why I was shocked that you posted it last night. No book in the World will allow you do this as it is a correlated parlay. Try says in the OP that no correlated parlays are allowed. Your example from the other thread included sides and totals from DIFFERENT matches, therefore was a valid bet. Llodra -600/Jarkko Nieminen -270/ B.Paire Games Won +3 1/2 -125/ L.Rosol Games Won Over 22½ -135 Llodra played Hajek, Jarrko played Sergiy, Paire played Simon and Rosol played Melzer. Last night you did Haas ML and Haas/Levine Under which is strictly prohibited everywhere. Try provided a example of what happens when you attempt to do this at a shop, the software won't let you and you have to replace your wager. So try cubed was correct to refund the wager, perhaps he wasn't around last night to void it on the same day. But it is his right to do so now since it was invalid.

[ProPicker713]

Like I said before I could really care less now about this.Let the thread die.

[trytrytry]

So Try will not take no action to replying in thread or the other one.
Not a good way to run a book.

Im confused over PMs you agreed and stated you would not take a corelated wager for betpoints from me thus infering you made a judgement error on this one and this is no action , full refund, as per the clear rules. guys this is all settled no problems, no hard feelings, no conflict, ..carry on!

[ProPicker713]

You told me I have to take a bet from you,I told my points are book.THE WHOLE POINT IS YOU COULD HAVE ATLEAST told me that the bet was invalid.I would have put it all on haas ml.I was pm'ing everyone telling them haas ml was a lock.

[trytrytry]

I think its great you sent PMs to give your ideas on Haas, your a good capper. U chose to make or just plain by accident made a judgement error on that wager, it happens, i forgive you. Thread closed!

Good luck tonight

[spankie]

Looks like nose picker is the new forum trash.

Have never seen this trash bag before.

Welcome to the dump.

[trytrytry]

Tommy Haas -195/ under 22 -120
Risk 350 to win 620

Had a busy day yesterday with virtually no forum time yesterday (smart phone PDA internet which is slow and clumsy and only a short time with my PC)

Ok Ive pid this one off if full.

I dont have automatic software like a sportsbook does if a bet is accepted or not (this is all manual and trust to the players for correct lines, nothing late, etc.)

To say "GOOD LUCK on the late matches" qualifies as accepting the LATE matches.... to say good night or Im off rest of night does not but" Good luck on late matches" is confirmation, like a sportsbook confirming a wager.

And the window after that point is to catch an error or invalid wager before the event starts and cancel refund. After it starts a book cant accept a partially corelated wager in its software and then later after the event or multiple events end against them say "nah I think Ill cancel those" (but would have kept the loss)


all sportsbooks should behave this way and not free roll the players who are taking the risk with POST up no guarentees they are going to win anything.



so the player obvioulsy gets the points here. because Im manual here, If it was posted but not confirmed (like most wagers I dont say anything after a person posts the plays) then no it was invalid obviously per the clear rules of this book.

Was hard to sort out on a smartphone last night, and read and grade the other wagers, get the tennis scores on the smartp[hone, and do PMs on this small issue.

but had the time now!

ok back and I will have more threads up and running now after a night off there.

[trytrytry]

20 points free play tt0827!