[shinnman]

thinkin about picking 5 or 6 traditionally bad road teams ( pitt,kc, etc..) runnin a 2 line labby, only playing games where the m/l is -150 or less, based on last years numbers your still hitting at 70% and since your using labby it seems like it would be profitable but would love some input

[shinnman]

these bets are only when the team in question is on the road

[TRE1968]

those shit teams wont be 150 or less too many times on the road

[shinnman]

you would be surprised, each of the teams i teseted got at least 30 games in last year as a 150 or lower

[rkelly110]

I'm labbying 2 winners, Philly and San Fran. and starting now in preseason. Up 6 units.

GL

[shinnman]

i like that rkelly, and im so friggin glad i found this site, labby is brilliant, gl to you

[PRiiMO]

what is labby?

[rkelly110]

Seattle was the worst last year as far as losing money -$3937. Betting against them is 62%
on the road or home.

My two teams, Philly is -$895 as fav's, +$1440 as dogs and won at 60%. San Fran is +$700
as fav's and +$350 as dogs, won at 57%.

All three good for lab lines. I like your idea because of the better percentage.

[shinnman]

labby is a money management system first invented by roullette players, it allows you to be around even while only winning around 40% of your bets so you can imagine th profits when your hitting around 60%, i had never heard of it until i got on here, now its pretty much all i bet, it keeps me disciplined and off tilt

[dodgerblue]

Shin, you should open a thread a track results - if nothing else just to educate the community. I actually do believe that something like this can be effective, and a labby system is probably the most effective way to play baseball.

[ebbearsfb1]

im gonna be fading 3 shit teams this year, every game astros, mets and cubs look like the teams so far might throw mariners in also

if line is above -150 then take run line

[shinnman]

love it , i always forget about r/l, hmmmmmm