ZcodeSystem.com winning picks for MLB

**everythingred** · 06-26-12, 09:24 AM

Originally posted by chound

There were only 6 plays......2-5 = 7

3-3 is correct. Plays picked up a little over 2 units depending on books played @

Sorry I meant 2/5 at the moment, the 6th game wasn't over. So when you go 3-3, you still make money? What does 3 stars represent?

**chound** · 06-26-12, 01:12 PM

In his previous threads he has stated each star is 1 unit meaning 3* would be 3 units. They recommend and track their plays @ $100 a unit.

Without looking at yesterdays lines, just knowing what I played they were a little over $200 in profit following their recommended unit size.

This system has been steadily making money even though they have had 0-10, 1-9 and a few other crappy days. If you were going to join I would definately recommend enough bankroll to get you through the first month then you should be fine. As far as other sports go only time will tell and with football and basketball you can't bet dogs, go 4-5 and make money unless you play the ML.

**zcodesystem** · 06-26-12, 04:53 PM

Here our todays Underdog system picks:
3 Stars Bet on Money line - Pittsburgh Pirates (MLB)
3 Stars Bet on Money line - Toronto Blue Jays (MLB)
3 Stars Bet on Money line - San Diego Padres (MLB)
3 Stars Bet on Money line - Arizona Diamondbacks (MLB)
3 Stars Bet on Money line - Miami Marlins (MLB)
3 Stars Bet on Money line - Chicago Cubs (MLB)
3 Stars Bet on Money line - Tampa Bay Rays (MLB)
3 Stars Bet on Money line - Minnesota Twins (MLB)
3 Stars Bet on Money line - Oakland Athletics (MLB)

**zcodesystem** · 06-26-12, 04:56 PM

Full anti capper system today. Top plays were sent to clients as usuall.

3* - [918] Baltimore Orioles 2.39 vs Los Angeles Angels
3* - [921] Toronto Blue Jays 2.41 vs Boston Red Sox
3* - [910] Chicago Cubs 2.12 vs New York Mets
3* - [926] Minnesota Twins 2.12 vs Chicago White Sox
3* - [928] Kansas City Royals 1.91 vs Tampa Bay Rays
3* - [914] Colorado Rockies 2.24 vs Washington Nationals
3* - [930] Seattle Mariners -1.5 2.75 vs Oakland Athletics

**zcodesystem** · 06-26-12, 04:57 PM

For those who want to get top plays delivered on email please join us http://pickstoemail.com/ pass: sbrforum The service is +$9500 on paid picks. Results are public and updated daily.

**zcodesystem** · 06-27-12, 02:40 AM

A day to forget yesterday. Moving on!

Underdog went 1-8, anticapper 2-5!

**zcodesystem** · 06-27-12, 05:05 AM

Here is math explanation why our approach with underdogs always wins long term:

Why with favorites you never win:

You never win with favorites (Imagine odd 1.70 which is awesome odd for favorite, usually it's 1.55 or worse)
You bet 100 first game and you lose.
Normally when favorite lose first game, odd drastically goes down but lets assume same odd (never happens), You bet again 100 and you win 70.
You are still 30 buscks down but third game you bet again 100 and you win 70
-100+70+70=0.4 UNITS won with a 2-1 favorite serie.

Now you lose 1-2 (this happen about half times with odds about 1.70)
first game you lose -100
second game you win +70
second game you lose -100
you are -1.3 UNITS down

Favorites with odds above 1.7 are not really favorites and a flip coin!

if you win 0.4 UNITS per serie won and you lose -1.3 per serie lost, you need at least 3 series won by favorite by only 1 won by underdog to be breakeven (still 0.25 units down) To be in profit 0.75 UNITS won you need 4 favorite series won and 1 lost.
Impossible to win like that!!!

**dynamo15f** · 06-27-12, 06:36 AM

NVM.

**zcodesystem** · 06-27-12, 10:53 AM

Underdog today,

Blue jays, cubs, mariners, diamondbacks, cardinals, padres, tigers and rockies

**Thewizard7** · 06-27-12, 01:59 PM

please stop the madness remember you are charging people on your VIP service money your VIP service is it making better plays than what you are posting why don't you post your best plays after the game starts that you say is a
5 star pick or you 10 other systems that you say work just post after the game starts this way no one is getting anything for free and you have full disclosure I don't understand why you market your systems charge people and get bad results just give full disclosure after the game starts

**Cyclone24** · 06-27-12, 04:40 PM

Originally posted by zcodesystem

Here is math explanation why our approach with underdogs always wins long term:

A 1.70 favorite will win 58.8% of times. They won't win "about half time" or "close to a coin flip", it's 58.8% in the long run.

That explanation you posted is funny. Basically you suggest we should blindly bet all the dogs because they have better odds.

**igrok** · 06-27-12, 08:20 PM

Originally posted by zcodesystem

Here is math explanation why our approach with underdogs always wins long term:Why with favorites you never win:

You never win with favorites (Imagine odd 1.70 which is awesome odd for favorite, usually it's 1.55 or worse)
You bet 100 first game and you lose.
Normally when favorite lose first game, odd drastically goes down but lets assume same odd (never happens), You bet again 100 and you win 70.
You are still 30 buscks down but third game you bet again 100 and you win 70
-100+70+70=0.4 UNITS won with a 2-1 favorite serie.

Now you lose 1-2 (this happen about half times with odds about 1.70)
first game you lose -100
second game you win +70
second game you lose -100
you are -1.3 UNITS down

Favorites with odds above 1.7 are not really favorites and a flip coin!

if you win 0.4 UNITS per serie won and you lose -1.3 per serie lost, you need at least 3 series won by favorite by only 1 won by underdog to be breakeven (still 0.25 units down) To be in profit 0.75 UNITS won you need 4 favorite series won and 1 lost.
Impossible to win like that!!!

Now I read it a couple of times, but I still don´t see any math....
So zcode plans to bet on series?
If it really would be like this, that an odd of 1.70 would be like a coinflip we would all become instant millionaires by blindly betting
the corresponding underdog odds. But lets do some math: 100/1.70=58.8%. (implied probability to do again some math).
Now I do not have a database which would confirm that number in reality and I dont want to make it too complicated and to take also into consideration bookmakers vig. But maybe some of the forum posters are able to confirm, that the reality shows that this number is around
58.8% (To do again some math: in reality it must be between 52.9% to 55.8% if your samplesize is big enough, so no sense to backtest a lousy week of games) And zcode, please do not sell us this quote from you as math, it is only crap...
If you want us to tell, that we need less than 50% winners, if we bet on underdogs, than it is ok. But..hey...seriously...I think it is really not very big news....

**GUMMO77** · 06-28-12, 02:12 AM

Originally posted by zcodesystem

Underdog today,

Blue jays, cubs, mariners, diamondbacks, cardinals, padres, tigers and rockies

**zcodesystem** · 06-28-12, 04:15 AM

Yeah, last two days were tough for this system, EVERY single favorite wins. On such days everyone is a capper. Every logical bet wins. That's when the bookies make people excited by easy wins like when you start with online casino winning on rouletter with fake money until you deposit real cash.. So once the people rise the stakes the harsh reality comes and favorites suddenly start losing. That's when anti-club is getting back on track!

**zcodesystem** · 06-29-12, 03:59 AM

When everything goes as expected (logic wins)! Anticlubs has no chance. pickstoemail anticlub went 1-2 it also took rockies This week has been hard for anticlub and awesome for logical cappers!! Balance law is telling us this will switch very soon again..

**CappersAccess** · 06-29-12, 02:18 PM

Originally posted by zcodesystem

When everything goes as expected (logic wins)! Anticlubs has no chance. pickstoemail anticlub went 1-2 it also took rockies This week has been hard for anticlub and awesome for logical cappers!! Balance law is telling us this will switch very soon again..

ZCode - Why have you taken the cappersaccess domain with a .org to sell this hoax. CappersAccess.com want's you to remove that site within the next couple of day's or further action will be taken.

John Stevens

**CappersAccess** · 06-29-12, 02:23 PM

ZCode - John Steves from CappersAccess.com want's you to remove your site using the CappersAccess name to sell your product or further action will be taken!

**CappersAccess** · 06-29-12, 02:28 PM

Moderator...If your reading this these clowns(ZCode) have hijacked our name (CappersAccess) to sell this garbage. I can't believe you let bottom feeders like this post.

**CappersAccess** · 06-29-12, 02:30 PM

Z-Code- I suggest you stop using the CappersAccess name to promote ZCode...... Pull the domain down!

**zcodesystem** · 06-29-12, 04:49 PM

We are having a difficult week, but we know based on past experience is that just after some difficulties, we are always back on track

!....
Most important thing is to take a look at the long term picture and not only focus on a single day or a single week results...
Take a look at our profit chart!

and lets bounce back today!!

Today anti-capper picks

Okland Athletics +1
Cincinati Reds
Seattle Mariners
Los Angeles Dodgers +1

With unit sizes:

6/29 8:05PM	$300 Pick [975] Oakland Athletics [976] Texas Rangers	[975] Oakland Athletics +1 2.34
6/29 8:10PM	$300 Pick [959] Arizona Diamondbacks [960] Milwaukee Brewers	[960] Milwaukee Brewers 2.10
6/29 8:10PM	$300 Pick [977] Kansas City Royals [978] Minnesota Twins	[978] Minnesota Twins 1.78
6/29 8:10PM	$300 Pick [959] Arizona Diamondbacks [960] Milwaukee Brewers	[959] OVER 9 2.00
6/29 10:10PM	$300 Pick [979] Boston Red Sox [980] Seattle Mariners	[980] Seattle Mariners 1.98
6/29 10:10PM	$300 Pick [979] Boston Red Sox [980] Seattle Mariners	[979] UNDER 8.5 1.98
6/29 10:10PM	$300 Pick [963] New York Mets [964] Los Angeles Dodgers	[964] Los Angeles Dodgers +1 1.97
6/29 10:10PM	$100 Pick [963] New York Mets [964] Los Angeles Dodgers	[964] Los Angeles Dodgers 2.28
6/29 10:15PM	$300 Pick [965] Cincinnati Reds [966] San Francisco Giants	[965] Cincinnati Reds 2.45

**zcodesystem** · 06-29-12, 04:52 PM

CappersAccess, don't worry, you were already reported to moderators for spamming the topic with false advertising. I also checked your site CappersAccess.com and it looks perfectly fine to me, it has nothing to do with us and we never heard of your site.

**CappersAccess** · 06-29-12, 05:07 PM

How about the .org site.....How do you explain that?

**zcodesystem** · 06-29-12, 05:14 PM

Org site is made by some affiliate, I see he is promoting a lot of things there, not just us. If you have any problem with him, please contact him directly. Clickbank does not provide the vendors with any info about affiliates so I am no help to you here. By the way you can also join our affiliate program if you are interested. You can send me PM for more details.

**CappersAccess** · 06-29-12, 05:21 PM

Do me a favor and let clickbank know you don't want them promoting you....That affiliate is a scum bag.

**zcodesystem** · 06-29-12, 05:29 PM

Do me a favor and let clickbank know you don't want them promoting you....That affiliate is a scum bag.

Sure, no problem. I will file a complain today about him. Though I still think you should try reaching him directly, it may be more effective to request a domain or buy it from him.

**zcodesystem** · 06-30-12, 10:53 AM

After some difficult days, we are getting back on track:

Here our early picks:
3 UNITS Bet on Money Line - New York Yankees (MLB)
3 UNITS Bet on Money Line - Los Angeles Angels (MLB)
3 UNITS Bet on Spread Line - Kansas City Royals +1.5 (MLB)
Check back later for more picks....

**dogs** · 06-30-12, 11:37 AM

Originally posted by zcodesystem

After some difficult days, we are getting back on track:

Here our early picks:
3 UNITS Bet on Money Line - New York Yankees (MLB)
3 UNITS Bet on Money Line - Los Angeles Angels (MLB)
3 UNITS Bet on Spread Line - Kansas City Royals +1.5 (MLB)
Check back later for more picks....

REALLY!!

**zcodesystem** · 06-30-12, 12:32 PM

3 UNITS Bet on Money Line - *Philadelphia Phillies (MLB)

3 UNITS Bet on under 7.5 runs in the game Washintong National Vs. Atlanta Braves (MLB)

**zcodesystem** · 06-30-12, 04:27 PM

Late plays
3 UNITS Bet on Money Line - Kansas City Royals(MLB)
3 UNITS Bet on Money Line - Arizona Diamondbacks(MLB)
3 UNITS Bet on Money Line - New York Mets(MLB)
3 UNITS Bet on Money Line - Boston Red Sox(MLB)

**dogs** · 06-30-12, 08:44 PM

**zcodesystem** · 07-01-12, 04:15 AM

Pretty bad day yesterday with a lot of strange results. Boston lost in extra innings and Diamondbacks and Angels collapsed. Mets and Yankees won as expected but that was not good enough.

**Cyclone24** · 07-01-12, 03:30 PM

^ Seems legit.

**dogs** · 07-01-12, 03:42 PM

Originally posted by Cyclone24

^ Seems legit.

nice free pic

**Delicious** · 07-01-12, 06:17 PM

Originally posted by zcodesystem

Here is math explanation why our approach with underdogs always wins long term:

Seriously SBR?? You still going to sell this garbage?

**zcodesystem** · 07-02-12, 09:38 AM

Seriously SBR?? You still going to sell this garbage?

Honestly I am tired of this. Our approach on underdogs and antipicks works on no matter how many bad popcorn days we have:

http://www.line.com/user/anticlub/Overall