1. #36
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32267

    Quote Originally Posted by ttwarrior1 View Post
    why are all you talking about stats, its not always about stats
    Analytics begin with the numbers.
    It's not always about the stats, I'm on record as saying that dozens of times, but you have to start someplace, everything in life is math driven, stats are the logical place to start.

    OK, let's forget about the math for one second, I've seen both players play pretty much their entire careers.
    Just my going on the eye test alone, they're very similar.

    I've seen Jeter play is whole career, some say he was just a mediocre defensive shortstop. which he was not.
    He was a very good defensive shortstop, granted his range wasn't as vast as say Ozzie's was, but Jeter made virtually every play, and then some.

    Plus Jeter had what metrics can't put a value on, baseball smarts.
    He knew where to position himself at all times for instance, etc etc. you know, the intangibles.

    You see, it's not always about the stats/math with me.

  2. #37
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32267

    Quote Originally Posted by stevek173 View Post
    A lot of people don't know this butt Don Mattingly isn't in the hall of Fame because he keeps a very dirty anus and everyone can smell him.
    Thanks for that contribution to this topic.

  3. #38
    stevek173
    stevek173's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-29-08
    Posts: 27,589
    Betpoints: 5964

    You're quite welcome..

    For the record I've never smelt him, just hear say.

  4. #39
    TommieGunshot
    TommieGunshot's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 03-27-12
    Posts: 1,555
    Betpoints: 6350

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    I've seen Jeter play is whole career, some say he was just a mediocre defensive shortstop. which he was not.
    He was a very good defensive shortstop, granted his range wasn't as vast as say Ozzie's was, but Jeter made virtually every play, and then some.
    This is the exact reason why some stats are needed to be used. One of the most important parts of defense is where the fielder is before the ball is even pitched. A shortstop with a weak arm will have to play a few steps in and someone watching them will see them diving after balls much more often. Sometimes those diving stops will turn into outs and look amazing, sometimes they will go for hits when they shouldn't. A shortstop with a stronger arm can play further back and won't be diving around, instead making plays that look routine when the same grounder would have been a hit with a different shortstop. That difference between Ripken and Jeter was distorted on TV, but shows up clearly in their stats.

  5. #40
    ChuckyTheGoat
    ChuckyTheGoat's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 04-04-11
    Posts: 31,511
    Betpoints: 24869

    Warrior, why would you say that about STats? I know you're smarter than that.

    Baseball is one of the best sports for Stats, b/c of so many individual matchups.

    Some more fodder on the 1b defense, Matt vs Hern.

    *Range Factor per 9IP: Matt 9.71, Hern 10.20.
    ...I admit that I don't know what this formula is, other than it means Hernandez got to more balls.

    *Assists per game: Matt .68, Hern .84.
    ...I always envision Mattingly as being in a good crouched ready position. But Hernandez was better on the AA range. Watching the games/highlights, Hernandez read the play so well. Keith was making diving plays. His arm was good, and he was great on leading the pitcher to the bag for the 3-1 putout.

  6. #41
    teecee
    teecee's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-09
    Posts: 6,274
    Betpoints: 2879

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    Seven time All Star
    Four time Gold Glove
    Three time Silver Slugger


    Year G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS OPS+
    1 48 177 156 28 39 9 1 8 26 4 0 20 53 0.25 0.333 0.474 0.808 117
    2 145 587 514 82 147 43 1 20 82 18 3 60 130 0.286 0.359 0.49 0.85 126
    3 160 710 602 103 182 36 3 36 125 15 7 99 145 0.302 0.401 0.551 0.952 160
    4 109 479 406 75 122 39 1 19 69 9 3 64 110 0.3 0.396 0.542 0.938 158
    5 159 695 567 103 182 38 2 33 110 21 5 118 151 0.321 0.435 0.57 1.005 168
    6 158 705 579 106 172 33 3 24 95 32 5 110 150 0.297 0.411 0.489 0.899 133
    7 155 665 558 117 166 34 3 36 120 18 5 94 147 0.297 0.404 0.563 0.966 142
    8 158 690 593 95 172 35 5 33 83 7 4 90 173 0.29 0.389 0.533 0.922 142
    9 161 682 597 97 155 25 1 34 97 3 1 78 166 0.26 0.346 0.476 0.821 115
    10 58 231 191 31 58 13 0 6 21 1 0 37 43 0.304 0.417 0.466 0.883 145
    11 158 679 603 102 177 36 2 31 99 12 0 67 136 0.294 0.365 0.514 0.879 141
    12 100 435 379 73 125 28 0 26 82 5 0 51 93 0.33 0.411 0.609 1.021 189
    12 Yrs 1569 6735 5745 1012 1697 369 22 306 1009 145 33 888 1497 0.295 0.391 0.527 0.918 144
    W/o looking at rest of thread, I'm saying Paul Goldschmidt and no, I don't think he'll get in. HOF numbers are out of reach for him. He's good, though.

  7. #42
    teecee
    teecee's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-18-09
    Posts: 6,274
    Betpoints: 2879

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    A lot of the HoF is political.
    Schilling isn't in because he's a kook, Hernandez because there are too many skeletons in his closet, and the power numbers are soft for a !B, if you must put Keith in then you must put Mattingly in.

    Trammell is in, why not Whitaker, and before answering, take a closer look at Lou's numbers, all of them, speed and defensive.
    Palmeiro because he owned up to steroids.
    We all know why Rose, A-Rod, Clemens, Mac, Sosa, and Bonds aren't in.
    Yeah, we all know why Mac, Sosa and Bonds aren't in. Baseball and the writers used them as scapegoats.

  8. #43
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,659
    Betpoints: 32267

    Quote Originally Posted by teecee View Post
    Yeah, we all know why Mac, Sosa and Bonds aren't in. Baseball and the writers used them as scapegoats.
    Pretty much.
    Bonds didn't need it, there's a lot of grey area with Mac, creatine is NOT banned in MLB, but he was ostracized for using it.
    Sosa had more than steroid allegations in his 'closet', like the corked bat incident. Palmeiro fessed up to using steroids.

    Cano was busted for using steroids while batting .220. Why bother, anybody can hit .220 without help.
    Davis (Baltimore) was busted for using Adderall, (I'm on it 40 ** a day) it's great for focus, but it's banned in MLB, script or no script.

    Andy Pettitte got off because he was using steroids while healing from an injury, he was not using it as a performance enhancer, also Pettitte produced a doctors notice from an MLB approved MD, as to what he was taking and why...

    Clemens, I'm not sure it was proven, but come on now, please, I don't need evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt he was juicing.
    Plus, he like Bonds, did not need it.

  9. #44
    stevek173
    stevek173's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-29-08
    Posts: 27,589
    Betpoints: 5964

    When asked about his perpetually unwashed, dirty anus Mattingly replied "a man should smell like a man"

  10. #45
    pologq
    When you are SBR you are SBR 4 Life
    pologq's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-07-12
    Posts: 19,849
    Betpoints: 5971

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    Pretty much.
    Bonds didn't need it, there's a lot of grey area with Mac, creatine is NOT banned in MLB, but he was ostracized for using it.
    Sosa had more than steroid allegations in his 'closet', like the corked bat incident. Palmeiro fessed up to using steroids.

    Cano was busted for using steroids while batting .220. Why bother, anybody can hit .220 without help.
    Davis (Baltimore) was busted for using Adderall, (I'm on it 40 ** a day) it's great for focus, but it's banned in MLB, script or no script.

    Andy Pettitte got off because he was using steroids while healing from an injury, he was not using it as a performance enhancer, also Pettitte produced a doctors notice from an MLB approved MD, as to what he was taking and why...

    Clemens, I'm not sure it was proven, but come on now, please, I don't need evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt he was juicing.
    Plus, he like Bonds, did not need it.
    with clemens i think they have a needle with his DNA and testimony. not sure if it was ever "proven".

    i could care less what clemens or bonds did honestly but that is me.

    as for goldschmidt, an MVP and reaching 400 homeruns in 3 good years would help a lot.

  11. #46
    d2bets
    d2bets's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 08-10-05
    Posts: 39,776
    Betpoints: 21653

    Quote Originally Posted by teecee View Post
    W/o looking at rest of thread, I'm saying Paul Goldschmidt and no, I don't think he'll get in. HOF numbers are out of reach for him. He's good, though.
    I think he eventually gets there, because it looks like he could very well have another 2-3 years as a top player and then a few more after that.

  12. #47
    TheGoldenGoose
    TheGoldenGoose's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-27-12
    Posts: 3,602
    Betpoints: 3597

    No. Numbers and longevity just not there.

  13. #48
    SBR_Guest_Pro
    SBR Intern
    SBR_Guest_Pro's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-10-15
    Posts: 3,958
    Betpoints: 2939

    Debateable

First 12
Top