 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
Washington Runline and Over in Dodgers Game
1-1 in the playoffs.
I like Washington on the run line at -1.5 (+145) - Strasbourg has struggled in the postseason because he's worn down late in the year, will be fresh here, Hendriks isn't the same pitcher on the road.
Dodgers-DIamonds over 7 (-125) - Walker is inconsistent and has never pitched in the postseas, Kershaw has had back issues and Diamondbacks lineup is better against left handed pitcher with Martinez.
I hope youre wrong... I have the Cubbies + the points
I hate rl’s
So many damn 1 run games
Good luck
Congratulations Morono, you finally got something right in your write up. Hendricks is indeed not the same pitcher on the road, both his ERA and BAA are lower than at home. Sharp.
Thanks douche bag, feel free to post before the game next time.Originally Posted by juicername
nats made Hendricks look like pedro.
throwing phucking 85mph and nats couldn't even make contact all night
The result doesn't matter. Just wanted to congratulate you on getting some facts right. No grass/turf info about this game btw?
Douchebag I'm 13-9 in the NFL feel free to post your picks.
well dodgers should go over.
8-0 or 8-1 type game.
walker aint ready for this
Why so worked up? Like I said, the results doesn't even matter because you're showing such extensive knowledge in your write ups. Such as going against Hendricks because he's not the same pitcher on the road (better than at home) and quoting turf stats for a game on grass.
[QUOTE=juicername;27258655]Why so worked up? Like I said, the results doesn't even matter because you're showing such extensive knowledge in your write ups. Such as going against Hendricks because he's not the same pitcher on the road (better than at home) and quoting turf stats for a game on grass.[/Q
Douche bag - you can attack me all you want - I'm 58% in the NFL what are you.
Just curious; did Kershaw's ERA at Coors Field play in at all in your decision to play the over in Diamonbacks/Dodgers?
Hey douche bag, aren't you the guy who said
So why's Giraldi supposed to do better when all he got are players as bad as Judge?
Yeah dude, aaron judge sucks, hitting 50 home run is easy to do - get lost you dumb shit.
Lol, why don't you go butt fuk your little butt buddy funnyb - maybe he can buy you a plane ticket to give him massages.
lol, someone is on a post search mission I see.
I think I remember that post though, and if you had any kind of reading comprehension you would understand that I made fun of the original poster who was saying that the Yankees players suck but that Girardi was terrible because he couldn't do better with the players he had.
Give us a college football play for Saturday man. Maybe give the points with Clemson at home? I've heard they're really strong as underdogs on the road!
Lol, keep trolling or justifying your dumb shit posts - I put 250 NFL picks up over the last 4 picks and hit 56% - you've put up dick.
Serious question though; do you think your reasoning behind your picks make sense, or are you just making stuff up without any research trying to justify a play you've already made up your mind about?
That's cool if that's the case.
Often it's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt though.
Little shit - I've put up 250 picks and hit 56% - you see you little trolls don't last 2 seconds when you are on your one not feeding off each other like maggots. I've put up 56% over 4 years - you've put up nothing. Bye little twat.
so where do you have those 250 picks logged?
I have them all logged on pregame - keep trolling douche bag.
Lol, where do you post your picks - or do you just troll and grab you pussy when you get called out.
But your profile there doesn't have any picks logged
You don't know what my screen name at pregame was and I posted my picks in the forum dumb fuk.
Not that I care but here's the link to my 2013-2014 season where went 44-28 against the spread - 61%
Last edited by thomorino; 10-07-17 at 02:52 AM.
So your claim is a tiny 72 game sample two seasons ago? OK ...
Oh, make that three season ago ...
Retarded - I have posted 250 picks over the last 4 years - I've posted picks every year for 4 years, that's 1 season. I am 56% over the 4 years - again, what is your record.So your claim is a tiny 72 game sample two seasons ago? OK ...
Oh, make that three season ago ...
What’s the goal here morino?
Retarded, what's the goal in trolling like a pussy - I'm responding to him.
So your goal for posting on this forum is to respond to trolling?
I find that unlikely.
Stay focused, take the heat in stride, learn as much as you can.
Good luck.
Where's the link
It was just a regular forum post with him stating his 2014/2015 NFL record + another useless "breakdown" of a game. Of course the thread had no replies, lol.
Probably why he came to SBR. Ultimate attention whore. Kind of sad actually.
you may be in the running for SBR's TOP Capper
Sammy back off the ratings game
This is 2017, not 2013 or 2014 and I don't see a link. Anyhow...It does not matter.
PS: Good hit on the Dodgers over...Kershaw continues to be junk in the playoffs just like every other year...
I am keeping track of morino's write ups and bets.
He is currently 6-14 in his write ups, 13-7 in his bets.
Not bad.
Reply With Quote