[larry040681]

record 0-2
units: -2.00
today's play:

record 0-2
units: -2.00
today's play: pitt@atl u8.0 -111

[Dukedude2440]

I know I know it's more than one play but I like this ff under in Cubs game .

under 4 +105

hamme with with good numbers vs nats bats and Ross has never thrown vs cubs .

100/105

cheerz

[2buckluck]

Got lucky avoiding a loss yesterday,
Record 0-1 (-1.3 U)
6/5: Seattle / TB under 7 (-115)
2 evenly matched teams with quiet offensive productions recently, Under 5-1 last 6 meetings between these 2, plus some other Under trends I hope continue tonight , BOL to All !!

Record 1-1 (-0.45 u)
6/6: Chicago / Wash F5 under 4 (-115)
Cubs avg only 2.6 runs last 11 games, Hamels era 2.1 / whip 0.6 last 3 starts, under is 5-1 last 6 meetings. Wash rookie starting could be a wildcard but I'm hoping other under indicators prevail, BOL!

[4seasons]

Mia @ Col OVER 10.5

[2buckluck]

I know I know it's more than one play but I like this ff under in Cubs game .

under 4 +105

hamme with with good numbers vs nats bats and Ross has never thrown vs cubs .

100/105

cheerz

Woah good timing, I was typing up same play, BOL to us both!

[pacman63]

Great hit on TB 2buck. I will tail for 2 units under 4

[leetreaper]

2-0

Rangers Under 8.0

[trobin31]

1-2; -1.2u

Milwaukee Brewers/Minnesota Twins. Under 8½ +105

[2daBank]

1-2 -1.05

hou/tor ov 9 +117..im sure you can get a 8.5on this if you wait but i prefer the plus money with risk of a push. jays rake vs lefties, the lefty hou throwing isnt anything special id expect the tor offense to continue putting up runs. other side hutch is solid enough but the bottom line is if he cant go really deep into the gm hou will more than likely get to the jays pen. i dont think either team has a problem getting to 4 here so push at worst imo but plenty of upside for more so ill gladly take the plus money..

also think jays -.5 ff is a solid play once again.. gl everyone

jays ff in the bank., now hou needs to help out with the scoring late so my totals dont become fade material!

[kgindy]

This . If the game is played, bad weather.

[Dukedude2440]

3-0-1 +185

cheerz on the jays game . The ff pushed in Cubs game hope everybody has a good day

cheers

[2daBank]

most ppl prob cashed with mine.. just a push for me taking the plus money right before it dropped down to 8.5 like the greedy bastard i am but cashed jays so who cares..

[No coincidences]

Watching this KC/TEX game -- there have been 18 hits, 4 errors ... and 5 runs. 17 LOB and counting between the two teams. This game should've already had 10 runs minimum. Spare me the "great" capping bullshit if you're on the under 8.

Totals are for suckers. Dart-chucking at its finest.

[2daBank]

Watching this KC/TEX game -- there have been 18 hits, 4 errors ... and 5 runs. 17 LOB and counting between the two teams. This game should've already had 10 runs minimum. Spare me the "great" capping bullshit if you're on the under 8.

Totals are for suckers. Dart-chucking at its finest.

you so bitter man.. everything gonna be alright, i promise..

[leetreaper]

2-0

Rangers Under 8.0

Yet another easy winner.

[No coincidences]

you so bitter man.. everything gonna be alright, i promise..

Not bitter about anything. I haven't bet an MLB total in years. This game just came to mind as a total fluke (which most totals are) and it amazes me that you guys pretend to "handicap" this shit.

[leetreaper]

Watching this KC/TEX game -- there have been 18 hits, 4 errors ... and 5 runs. 17 LOB and counting between the two teams. This game should've already had 10 runs minimum. Spare me the "great" capping bullshit if you're on the under 8.

Totals are for suckers. Dart-chucking at its finest.

[No coincidences]

Yet another easy winner.

[No coincidences]

Let me guess: you knew there would be 20 hits, 4 errors and 19 runners LOB, right?

[leetreaper]

Let me guess: you knew there would be 20 hits, 4 errors and 19 runners LOB, right?

Get a clue first dawg...

[No coincidences]

Get a clue first dawg...

What in the hell is that supposed to mean?

I watched the entire game. Start to finish. Did you? No offense, but cashing that under was an absolute joke.

[leetreaper]

What in the hell is that supposed to mean?

I watched the entire game. Start to finish. Did you? No offense, but cashing that under was an absolute joke.

Obv I'm doing something wrong with all my 3 Unders been not even close to the total and my thread is +30 units with 100+ plays...

[No coincidences]

Obv I'm doing something wrong with all my 3 Unders been not even close to the total and my thread is +30 units with 100+ plays...

I'm talking about this one game, not your thread.

[2daBank]

Not bitter about anything. I haven't bet an MLB total in years. This game just came to mind as a total fluke (which most totals are) and it amazes me that you guys pretend to "handicap" this shit.

every game has a certain amount of randomness,, lots of them go how you expect yet dont produce the results, others go completely differently than you thought and you steal ones you didnt deserve. if you doing things right there just more that play out closer to how expected, nothing more, nothing less.

exactly the same as sides. you have never lost a side where the team you were on outplayed the other? happens all the time. other times you win games you had no business winning.. looks like pads hitting into a dp every inning, tribe couldnt cash a run with bases juiced 1 out. not sure how totals are any more random that sides in the same price range?? it baseball, you stick with what works for ya and hope that over the long haul it plays out in your favor, if not you tweak your approach.

[leetreaper]

I'm talking about this one game, not your thread.

What's the big deal with 20 total hits? 6 runs is very reasonable with good defenses and pitchers with decent strand ratios...

[leetreaper]

What in the hell is that supposed to mean?

I watched the entire game. Start to finish. Did you? No offense, but cashing that under was an absolute joke.

If you don't understand how to cap totals ( you said yourself you never bet/cap them ), watching games won't help you and it doesn't mean that this particular Under was a bad bet.

[No coincidences]

every game has a certain amount of randomness,, lots of them go how you expect yet dont produce the results, others go completely differently than you thought and you steal ones you didnt deserve. if you doing things right there just more that play out closer to how expected, nothing more, nothing less.

exactly the same as sides. you have never lost a side where the team you were on outplayed the other? happens all the time. other times you win games you had no business winning.. looks like pads hitting into a dp every inning, tribe couldnt cash a run with bases juiced 1 out. not sure how totals are any more random that sides in the same price range?? it baseball, you stick with what works for ya and hope that over the long haul it plays out in your favor, if not you tweak your approach.

When you're betting sides, you're betting wins and losses -- which is all that matters to teams.

When you're betting totals, you're taking so many more random things into consideration that managers and players simply don't care about that could severely alter the final score.

[No coincidences]

If you don't understand how to cap totals ( you said yourself you never bet/cap them ), watching games won't help you and it doesn't mean that this particular Under was a bad bet.

I "understand" how to cap totals. Do you think when I cap a game I don't come to a conclusion on a score? That doesn't even make sense.

[2daBank]

When you're betting sides, you're betting wins and losses -- which is all that matters to teams.

When you're betting totals, you're taking so many more random things into consideration that managers and players simply don't care about that could severely alter the final score.

i strongly disagree that there a difference at all. runs are how teams win and lose, if you dont think you have a good handle on how many they will score i think it would be difficult to figure out who gonna get those wins and losses.

[No coincidences]

i strongly disagree that there a difference at all. runs are how teams win and lose, if you dont think you have a good handle on how many they will score i think it would be difficult to figure out who gonna get those wins and losses.

I just think there's a lot more unpredictability to pegging a score vs. pegging a win vs. a loss long-term, but to each his own. Not all the time, but I've bet baseball long enough (and watched it religiously long enough) that the # of runs is much more random than simply who comes out on top in a given game. That's just my take.

You've been on the wrong side of a lot of bullshit fluke totals over the course of the last year. I'm surprised you are still so steadfast about betting them.

[justanotherclown]

Lol this dude is real butthurt

[larry040681]

record 0-2
units: -2.00
today's play: pitt@atl u8.0 -111

record 0-3
units: -3.00
today's play:

[BamaCBass]

Different ppl definitely have different skill sets for sure. In my case, I have a knack for picking losers and should seriously consider fading myself unless it's college foots...

I see both sides to this coin (no pun intended, lol) but we can definitely use this thread as an excellent sample bc the proof is in the pudding so they say. NoCo, I do think the bad beats and ridiculous comebacks even out over time so the problem is in the stress of watching. Of course it helps to watch games but f\*\*k it when it comes to totals often times.

[trobin31]

1-2; -1.2u

Milwaukee Brewers/Minnesota Twins. Under 8½ +105

2-2; -0.15u

[larry040681]

record 0-3
units: -3.00
today's play:

record 0-3
units: -3.00
today's play: ff cards@lad under 3.5 -123