[stevenash]

Second -300 line in a week.
Last week was Kershaw who covered easily.

Personally I think anybody who lays 3:1 (some shops have -315, others -280, so for arguments sake let's call it 3:1) on a irrelevant game in May needs to turn in their gambling card, but who am I to judge.

Even in a parlay it really doesn't cut into the books edge.
Run line you still have to lay -130.

Can't bet it.
Yeah, Nats should win this game going away, but if you got the three, do you really need to one?

[BIGDAY]

I laid the juice. Easy win.

[ZetaPsi808]

phillies +1.5 is the play.

nats just swept the yankees and due for a letdown game

[incognitoh]

phillies +1.5 is the play.

nats just swept the yankees and due for a letdown game

Any MLB game that you can get +1.5 at plus money is the play.

[KiDBaZkiT]

Can't believe what the manctush the public has developed for scherz. He's no longer my boy. Hate to admit it but Bryce Harper slowly becoming my favorite player

[ZetaPsi808]

Any MLB game that you can get +1.5 at plus money is the play.

it is not that easy or cut and dry, but generally i lean to the +1.5 side in this -300 games

[STAX]

Nats are playing the best baseball in MLB for 3 weeks now. Nats -1.5 is the play here, they are hammering the ball vrs bad pitching. Sherzer might be the most reliable pitcher in the game right now. Dude is lights out every start.

[STAX]

Sherzer: 8 starts

- went at least 7 innings 7 times, 6 innings once.

- Given up 6 or less Hits + BBs in 6 starts

- Given up over 2 ER once

.92 WHIP
1.75 ERA
.207 BAA

I mean this is Kershaw of last year good. Take away one bad start he's given up 6 ER in 50 innings.

Nats -1.5

[STAX]

Nats are easily the best team in baseball. They will have the Cy Young (Max) and MVP (Bryce)... Will have the best record in MLB at the end of the year... only team in the league with a chance to win 100 games

[Big Bear]

who is on the hill for the Phillies ?

The Phils have been playing good baseball recently but unless Hamels or Harang is pitching i would still probably either pass or play Nationals -1

[STAX]

who is on the hill for the Phillies ?

all you need to see, lmao

[STAX]

He aready faced Washington twice this year, Nats won both games in mid april (7-2 and 4-3). Nats were sucking then and still beat him twice. I don't think Sean "BuckChowder" O'Sullivan is gonna shut down that machine. Phillies score 3 runs max. Nats score 5+... easy RL bet here

[Big Bear]

all you need to see, lmao

damn he looks like a fukkin douche bag.


i have been waiting a month and a half to fade buchanan but i guess they sent him to the minors

[posey]

Can't tell you how much I hate it when guys who post in forums call professionals 'douche bag' or something like that.

[Big Bear]

Can't tell you how much I hate it when guys who post in forums call professionals 'douche bag' or something like that.

lol i said he looks like a douche

look at the fukkin guy and tell me he looks like a good ball player

guy is a tool and fat fukk to boot

its his job to be in a good shape and he is clearly a slob

[jameski999]

Can't tell you how much I hate it when guys who post in forums call professionals 'douche bag' or something like that.

You're right. BB is on a gambling forum 18hrs a day and calling a millionaire baseball player a douche. Guy has prob pounded more pu$$y this week then BB has in his whole life. Time for a look in the mirror Big Bear.

[Big Bear]

You're right. BB is on a gambling forum 18hrs a day and calling a millionaire baseball player a douche. Guy has prob pounded more pu$$y this week then BB has in his whole life. Time for a look in the mirror Big Bear.

i promise you that guy is not pounding any pussy

danny devito gets more ass than that guy guaranteed

[posey]

lol i said he looks like a douche

look at the fukkin guy and tell me he looks like a good ball player

guy is a tool and fat fukk to boot

its his job to be in a good shape and he is clearly a slob

Man, please calm down. That's embarassing. You don't have to like this guy or his abilities but judging people you don't know personally is not only childish, it's a very negative characteristic.

'Douche bag', 'tool', 'fat fukk to boot', 'slob', 'not pounding any pussy', do you find even more hate?

Does MadBum look like a godd ball player? Or did Randy Johnson?

This guy is married since 6 years and has made a ton of money by playing baseball. And you are only a forum member here and write about him like that?

[ThaTopMoron]

it's the Phillies... they were back to a 18-24 record after their lil win streak + 2-2 split vs Col... on the road... due to lose at least 5 in a row. starting yesterday

WAS prob wins by 3+

would bet under but WAS offense might sink that themselves

[Big Bear]

actually Mad Bum and Randy Johnson absolutely look the part

Tall Lanky left handed mean looking country boys

[STAX]

Phillies might throw Paul Bunyan in this guy's uni and trot him out there. Then the Nats would be in deep shit...

[GT21Megatron]

Nats RL Nash

[stevenash]

Sherzer: 8 starts

- went at least 7 innings 7 times, 6 innings once.

- Given up 6 or less Hits + BBs in 6 starts

- Given up over 2 ER once

.92 WHIP
1.75 ERA
.207 BAA

I mean this is Kershaw of last year good. Take away one bad start he's given up 6 ER in 50 innings.

Nats -1.5

There have been 124 pitchers so far this season that has made each and every of their teams starts.
When you factor in all angles, Shelby Miller is the best pitcher so far as of tonight, Max checks in at #3.

(Stras checks in at #117 out of 124)

Miller has a better ERA, better won/loss record, and on and on and on.

Also in an era where virtually no pitcher completes what they start, two out of Miller's last three starts have been complete game, nine inning shutouts.

No bullpen help, just nine consecutive shut out innings.

I still maintain even if you are 1968 Bob Gibson you don't wager a runline at home, and at negative money (-130) it's insane.

Top of nine, one out, closer in, Max in dugout icing his arm, just pitched 7 full ininngs of 1 run ball, Nats up 3-1, like I said 1 out, Revere at the plate, spanks a single, takes second on catchers indifference, why should they hold him on up 2 runs? Galvis singles home Revere, 3-2 Nats now, Utley smokes a one hopper to third base for a game ending 5-4-3 DP.

Nats win 3-2, your -130 runline wager loses.
Sucks to be you

[stevenash]

Man, please calm down. That's embarassing. You don't have to like this guy or his abilities but judging people you don't know personally is not only childish, it's a very negative characteristic.

'Douche bag', 'tool', 'fat fukk to boot', 'slob', 'not pounding any pussy', do you find even more hate?

Does MadBum look like a godd ball player? Or did Randy Johnson?

This guy is married since 6 years and has made a ton of money by playing baseball. And you are only a forum member here and write about him like that?

Posey.
The voice of reason

[stevenash]

Nats RL Nash

Can't bet a runline at home at -130, goes against every fiber of my wagering DNA.

[terrortwylight]

man, please calm down. That's embarassing. You don't have to like this guy or his abilities but judging people you don't know personally is not only childish, it's a very negative characteristic.

'douche bag', 'tool', 'fat fukk to boot', 'slob', 'not pounding any pussy', do you find even more hate?

Does madbum look like a godd ball player? Or did randy johnson?

This guy is married since 6 years and has made a ton of money by playing baseball. And you are only a forum member here and write about him like that?

thank you

[upscope]

I still maintain even if you are 1968 Bob Gibson you don't wager a runline at home, and at negative money (-130) it's insane.

Top of nine, one out, closer in, Max in dugout icing his arm, just pitched 7 full ininngs of 1 run ball, Nats up 3-1, like I said 1 out, Revere at the plate, spanks a single, takes second on catchers indifference, why should they hold him on up 2 runs? Galvis singles home Revere, 3-2 Nats now, Utley smokes a one hopper to third base for a game ending 5-4-3 DP.

Nats win 3-2, your -130 runline wager loses.
Sucks to be you

That's the reason you're laying -130 rather than minus -300

Then go ahead & take the +1.5 @ +110.....Then you can watch another scenario play out where Nats score 2 in the first another in the 3rd & tack on 3 more in the 5th. Max does his part going 7 strong giving UP 5 hits & 1 earned before turning over a 6-1 game to the pen in the 8th. The Nats add an "insurance" run in the bottom half as the pen mops it UP for a 7-1 final & your +110 runline wager loses.

You see how that works, genius??

[STAX]

Ive been killing on Nats RL bets. This is probably the easiest one

[Ra77er]

Nats 19-22 ATS -21 Units thus far. 8-10 at home this year specifically. Compare that to 12-6 ML at home.

[stevenash]

That's the reason you're laying -130 rather than minus -300

Then go ahead & take the +1.5 @ +110.....Then you can watch another scenario play out where Nats score 2 in the first another in the 3rd & tack on 3 more in the 5th. Max does his part going 7 strong giving UP 5 hits & 1 earned before turning over a 6-1 game to the pen in the 8th. The Nats add an "insurance" run in the bottom half as the pen mops it UP for a 7-1 final & your +110 runline wager loses.

You see how that works, genius??

Listen to me slick, I personally think Washington wins this game, from a gamblers point of view, this is a game I want NO part of.
(and I actually have 30 dollars worth of lineups in play at FD with Max listed as my starter.)

You don't ever, ever, lay minus anything on a run line with a home team and I'm sure as shit not going to take 1.5 runs with a #4 starter on a crap team either. But I'm not laying -130 on a -1.5 run line either.

Now slick, what part of NO PLAY FOR ME don't you understand.
Was it the word play? Or was it the word ME?

There are 30 better wagering options on the board then this one.

Oh, by the way slick, the next time I ask you for baseball or gambling advice will be the first time.

Get it, got it, good

[t-bone]

There have been 124 pitchers so far this season that has made each and every of their teams starts.
When you factor in all angles, Shelby Miller is the best pitcher so far as of tonight, Max checks in at #3.

(Stras checks in at #117 out of 124)

Miller has a better ERA, better won/loss record, and on and on and on.

Also in an era where virtually no pitcher completes what they start, two out of Miller's last three starts have been complete game, nine inning shutouts.

No bullpen help, just nine consecutive shut out innings.

I still maintain even if you are 1968 Bob Gibson you don't wager a runline at home, and at negative money (-130) it's insane.

Top of nine, one out, closer in, Max in dugout icing his arm, just pitched 7 full ininngs of 1 run ball, Nats up 3-1, like I said 1 out, Revere at the plate, spanks a single, takes second on catchers indifference, why should they hold him on up 2 runs? Galvis singles home Revere, 3-2 Nats now, Utley smokes a one hopper to third base for a game ending 5-4-3 DP.

Nats win 3-2, your -130 runline wager loses.
Sucks to be you

[upscope]

Listen to me slick, I personally think Washington wins this game, from a gamblers point of view, this is a game I want NO part of.
(and I actually have 30 dollars worth of lineups in play at FD with Max listed as my starter.)

You don't ever, ever, lay minus anything on a run line with a home team and I'm sure as shit not going to take 1.5 runs with a #4 starter on a crap team either. But I'm not laying -130 on a -1.5 run line either.

Now slick, what part of NO PLAY FOR ME don't you understand.
Was it the word play? Or was it the word ME?

There are 30 better wagering options on the board then this one.

Oh, by the way slick, the next time I ask you for baseball or gambling advice will be the first time.

Get it, got it, good

Your puzzy hurt or something??

[Big Bear]

Listen to me slick, I personally think Washington wins this game, from a gamblers point of view, this is a game I want NO part of.
(and I actually have 30 dollars worth of lineups in play at FD with Max listed as my starter.)

You don't ever, ever, lay minus anything on a run line with a home team and I'm sure as shit not going to take 1.5 runs with a #4 starter on a crap team either. But I'm not laying -130 on a -1.5 run line either.

Now slick, what part of NO PLAY FOR ME don't you understand.
Was it the word play? Or was it the word ME?

There are 30 better wagering options on the board then this one.

Oh, by the way slick, the next time I ask you for baseball or gambling advice will be the first time.

Get it, got it, good

[stevenash]

^
coming from the forums biggest idiot, an idiot of biblical proportions, all one can do is laugh.

[Big Bear]

^
coming from the forums biggest idiot, an idiot of biblical proportions, all one can do is laugh.