[44 Mag]

One early wager for the afternoon game.
I think I will roll the dice with STL, seeing as how Wainwright has been alternating wins and losse since the AS break, and the MVP for Pitt. is most likely out.

STL @ PITT: STL to win -118 @ 5 Dimes.


10/137.103.10/22.8

[RollinDo]

What the Fudge do all those numbers mean in your post?
You some kinda math geek?

[44 Mag]

What the Fudge do all those numbers mean in your post?
You some kinda math geek?

What??? you don't understand -118 ??? LOL

[labones00]

One early wager for the afternoon game.
I think I will roll the dice with STL, seeing as how Wainwright has been alternating wins and losse since the AS break, and the MVP for Pitt. is most likely out.

STL @ PITT: STL to win -118 @ 5 Dimes.


10/137.103.10/22.8

i think he meant the bottom #

[RollinDo]

No. I meant -118.
Just didn't think anyone in their right mind would pay that price for Cards today.
The bottom number string is not rocket science guys.
LOL

[44 Mag]

What the Fudge do all those numbers mean in your post?
You some kinda math geek?

OK, it's a mathematical formula to determine the easiest path to financial success using algebraic denominators coupled with geometric analysis. It also hepls to show the positive and negative flow of physics as applied to baseball. I thought you guys knew that.

[RollinDo]

LaBones - where you been?
Not getting any good input from sbr lately without you.
Mag and GiveMeMoney have some good plays but they think they're such hot stuff they don't need to give a blurb about their plays.

[44 Mag]

LaBones - where you been?
Not getting any good input from sbr lately without you.
Mag and GiveMeMoney have some good plays but they think they're such hot stuff they don't need to give a blurb about their plays.

Arschloch.

[RollinDo]

Arschloch.

Donkey-shin
Right back at'cha!

[RollinDo]

OK, it's a mathematical formula to determine the easiest path to financial success using algebraic denominators coupled with geometric analysis. It also hepls to show the positive and negative flow of physics as applied to baseball. I thought you guys knew that.

I applied that formula. Basically it reveals to take the Under in every game. Somehow I am only up marginally though.
Is it flawed??

[44 Mag]

Donkey-shin
Right back at'cha!

[44 Mag]

I applied that formula. Basically it reveals to take the Under in every game. Somehow I am only up marginally though.
Is it flawed??

Of course it is not flawed, it must be the operator who inputs the plays.

[44 Mag]

Donkey-shin
Right back at'cha!

You used the wrong translator. LOL.

[AchillesTG]

I am with you on Cards. They have been alternating wins and Wainwright got upset by the Phillies last time out.

St. Louis -113 2U Play
MLB[General]
08/27/14 12:35 PM ET

[44 Mag]

I am with you on Cards. They have been alternating wins and Wainwright got upset by the Phillies last time out.

St. Louis -113 2U Play
MLB[General]
08/27/14 12:35 PM ET

Well, the other day we joined forces and were successful, let's hope for the same result. BOL A TG.

That was Saturday when w e took Minn. and the rest of the world took Detroit.

[Legend_beatz]

Lets get em, killa!

[Legend_beatz]

I'm on the Mariners and Indians today. Meet you gentlemen at the bank.

[44 Mag]

I'm on the Mariners and Indians today. Meet you gentlemen at the bank.

BOL LB, the Cards cost me money, no run support for Waino.

[CWD]

OK, it's a mathematical formula to determine the easiest path to financial success using algebraic denominators coupled with geometric analysis. It also hepls to show the positive and negative flow of physics as applied to baseball. I thought you guys knew that.

thats good u are using something cause not once have you ever posted an original thought or analysis of a game

yet to see you ever play an underdog either so that formula cant mean that much

[RollinDo]

I'm on the Mariners and Indians today. Meet you gentlemen at the bank.

Are there separate counters for withdrawals abd deposits???
If so, think we'll be in different lines.
Never gone to the bank for winning bets.
Only lost about 10% of my BR since I started about 1.5 years ago, so not doing too badly.
Nba killed me in 2013 in playoffs...otherwise would be on the plus side.

[44 Mag]

thats good u are using something cause not once have you ever posted an original thought or analysis of a game

yet to see you ever play an underdog either so that formula cant mean that much

Hey loser, it was meant as a joke for my friend, of course you wouldn't understand because I doubt you have any friends. You just like to come in and "troll" around and comment on everybody else. Get lost! Nobody here wants to talk to you. Please go away. Thanks. You truly are a pathetic "thing".

[44 Mag]

Are there separate counters for withdrawals abd deposits???
If so, think we'll be in different lines.
Never gone to the bank for winning bets.
Only lost about 10% of my BR since I started about 1.5 years ago, so not doing too badly.
Nba killed me in 2013 in playoffs...otherwise would be on the plus side.

Hey pal, you got your under, you should be happy. LOL.

[RollinDo]

Hey CWD - if you have followed Mag in mlb the last 2 months you would have seen some analysis and insight into his plays.
Go back to college kid...and you might recognize this ain't no formula for sports betting. Oh - and if you're that dense, I got some Oceanfront property in AZ I'd like to sell ya.

[RollinDo]

Hey pal, you got your under, you should be happy. LOL.

True. I should have mentioned it's part of an IF Win bet...O's Under gotta hit tonight...will hedge some on the Over.
Will post on our other thread now.

[44 Mag]

True. I should have mentioned it's part of an IF Win bet...O's Under gotta hit tonight...will hedge some on the Over.
Will post on our other thread now.

BOL .

[CWD]

[44 Mag]

True. I should have mentioned it's part of an IF Win bet...O's Under gotta hit tonight...will hedge some on the Over.
Will post on our other thread now.

Just do what the rest of us do and ignore C.hemical W.aste D.ump

[44 Mag]

One early wager for the afternoon game.
I think I will roll the dice with STL, seeing as how Wainwright has been alternating wins and losse since the AS break, and the MVP for Pitt. is most likely out.

STL @ PITT: STL to win -118 @ 5 Dimes.


10/137.103.10/22.8

Adding: Seattle TT over 4.

[nickcruz60]

Mags I took TX ff and for the game after the cardinals ruined my morning. Bol on Seattle hitting 4. They should be able too

[44 Mag]

Mags I took TX ff and for the game after the cardinals ruined my morning. Bol on Seattle hitting 4. They should be able too

Doubtful. They gave up on this game in the second inning. Pretty pathetic for a home team to quit like that so early in front of their fans. They were losing 9-1 and left Ramirez in to pitch????? What does that tell, you. Sad state of affairs in MLB.

[44 Mag]

Adding: Seattle TT over 4.

PUSH. Luckily.