1. #1
    Itsamazing777
    Not interested....
    Itsamazing777's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-14-12
    Posts: 11,182
    Betpoints: 1712

    Phillies, yes the phillies cash my parlay!!

    Wowwwwwww
    Thank you Hanley Ramirez!!

  2. #2
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,660
    Betpoints: 32291

    Had 'em too @-105
    Hamels matched up better than Nolasco going in, that was one of the easiest plays this week in a week of difficult games to wager.

  3. #3
    riffraff24
    ...and out come the wolves
    riffraff24's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-20-11
    Posts: 7,234
    Betpoints: 55

    So how many times did you guys bet against the dodgers before finally winning?

  4. #4
    Itsamazing777
    Not interested....
    Itsamazing777's Avatar SBR PRO
    Join Date: 11-14-12
    Posts: 11,182
    Betpoints: 1712

    Actually none, lol. Don't bet their games
    just liked the phillies line today

  5. #5
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,660
    Betpoints: 32291

    Quote Originally Posted by riffraff24 View Post
    So how many times did you guys bet against the dodgers before finally winning?
    I don't fade streaks (very often, and when I do, it's not because they are due to lose), and I don't lay juice higher than -130.
    Do the math

  6. #6
    Jefferey13
    Jefferey13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-10-13
    Posts: 624

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    I don't fade streaks, and I don't lay juice higher than -130.
    Do the math
    dude first of all, you said you faded the dodger so you were fading the game so that is fading the streak.

    Second, the hamels/nolasco matchup had nothing to do with the result, so don't call it an easy play.

    third, the line of -130 has NOTHING to do with the juice.

    Jeez, I wish there was an IQ test to post first. Like must have above an 85.
    Nomination(s):
    This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: riffraff24

  7. #7
    riffraff24
    ...and out come the wolves
    riffraff24's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 04-20-11
    Posts: 7,234
    Betpoints: 55

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenash View Post
    I don't fade streaks (very often, and when I do, it's not because they are due to lose), and I don't lay juice higher than -130.
    Do the math
    Didnt you have a thread betting against the dodgers not too long ago?

  8. #8
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,660
    Betpoints: 32291

    Quote Originally Posted by riffraff24 View Post
    Didnt you have a thread betting against the dodgers not too long ago?
    Find it, very doubtful.
    You find the thread I started about fading the Dodgers, I'll eat my words. No such thread exists you fukking broke dik fuk.

  9. #9
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,660
    Betpoints: 32291

    Quote Originally Posted by Jefferey13 View Post
    dude first of all, you said you faded the dodger so you were fading the game so that is fading the streak.

    Second, the hamels/nolasco matchup had nothing to do with the result, so don't call it an easy play.

    third, the line of -130 has NOTHING to do with the juice.

    Jeez, I wish there was an IQ test to post first. Like must have above an 85.
    Hey asshole I don't lay more that -130.
    Now I am going to do this in easy baby steps for you, because you are slower than Corky.

    1)Hey asshole go back to post #5
    When done with step 1, go to step 2

    2)What part of (very often, and when I do, it's not because they are due to lose)
    very often means I don't fade streaks very often.

  10. #10
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,660
    Betpoints: 32291

    Quote Originally Posted by riffraff24 View Post
    Didnt you have a thread betting against the dodgers not too long ago?
    How you making out finding that thread I started Corky?

  11. #11
    Jefferey13
    Jefferey13's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 07-10-13
    Posts: 624

    Dude, what I was trying to tell you is that you don't know the basic terms of betting. Odds and juice are NOT the same thing. Stop saying you don't lay juice higher than -130. That makes no sense.

  12. #12
    stevenash
    stevenash's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date: 01-17-11
    Posts: 62,660
    Betpoints: 32291

    Quote Originally Posted by Jefferey13 View Post
    Dude, what I was trying to tell you is that you don't know the basic terms of betting. Odds and juice are NOT the same thing. Stop saying you don't lay juice higher than -130. That makes no sense.
    Look, you are OK by me, so sorry if I was harsh, I get in arguments all the time re: this very same thing, about half the people I discuss the meanings of juice v. odds agree with you, and half say the same thing as I do, when used in the context that I did, the two words are interchangable


    I really would love RiffRaff to produce that thread I started.

Top