(1) ends with giants win
(2) ends with kings win
(3) ends with dodgers win
(4) ends with jets win
(5) ends with islanders win
(6) advances with red wings loss
(7) advances with angels loss
(8) advances with red sox loss
(9) advances with mariners loss
I would imagine this does not need explaining but just in case. For the different numbered chases for the advances you go back and you find the amount lost in the first numbered chase, for the (6) chase it would be the red wings. So take that loss and add one unit to it and that is what you will be betting to win for the (6-2) game.
Reasons why i like this hybrid martingale strategy . . .
1) with multiple chases going on all the time with multiple steps its harder for books to see that you are actually doing a martingale system. It will tend to look more like a bettor who is assigning different unit bets on different plays
2) If you go on a bad streak you will not be stuck on a D bet or greater potentially wrecking you. Simply branching out the chases allows you to create more chases at a smaller unit size so bad streaks that will happen will be less likely to kill you. The down side here is that you will have a lot of outstanding chases but if your a decent game picker you should be able to close them out
3) It allows you to start new chases before others are previously closed out if you have a game you like but you are not confident enough to add it to an existing chase.
It was between the dodgers and athletics on which game i would choose here. I picked the dodgers because i like the pitching match up more for this game as well as the revenge factor for Greinke's collar bone.
If these lose tomorrow they will be branched out into smaller chases like before.
SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks
Reply With Quote