Risking over 5.6 G-notes to get back less than 2, on a sporting event, the NFL no less? Must be nice to have boat loads of cash to burn. Frankly, if you like da Bears, just give the six and half so you only have to risk 2.2, and you'll get back even more than the 1.9. So you're basically risking an extra 3.4, to only win 1.9, because you fear da Bears will win but by less than 7. Isn't it prudent to save the extra 3.4 in your pocket, where you would win the full 2, to say the Bears will win by 7+ tonight? They say, if you don't like the fave to cover, no play when you're talking all that chalk (-295). Obviously, you don't think da Bears will romp, and if you're concerned that they will only win by one score, what does that tell you? Yea, one-turnover, one bad call, that's all it takes for you to flush the full 5.6 away.
I see the line is down to -255 now, which is HUGE, and not a good sign for you. That begs the question, why would anyone willing risk so much cash on a meaningless game, place the wager in the morning? If it were me, I'd be waiting for the pregame report. How else do you know of any late injuries/scratches, current weather, last minute changes before you lock in the risk of THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS? That may be fine if you truly are a billionaire, and piss away thousands of dollars like your drinking an endless cup of draught beer, but what kind of billionaire instead of being on their yacht with a boatload of bikinis is posting their play on a free internet forum?