I'd be very careful here Sanchez is a high strike out pitcher and has been lights out past month hence Leland giving him start over scherzer. Oakland lead MLB in strike outs you saw what happened game 1 verlander 11 ks Oakland couldn't get going
 SBR Top-Rated Sportsbooks |
Best Sportsbooks List
|
|
| |||||
| #1 FanDuel | SBR rating 4.8/5 | Review | #6 BetRivers | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review | #2 Caesars | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #7 Fanatics | SBR rating 4.1/5 | Review |
| #3 DraftKings | SBR rating 4.7/5 | Review | #8 Betway | SBR rating 3.8/5 | Review | ||
| #4 BetMGM | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #9 Borgata | SBR rating 3.5/5 | Review | ||
| #5 bet365 | SBR rating 4.6/5 | Review | #10 ClutchBet | SBR rating 2.9/5 | Review | ||
-
10-09-12 12:54 PM #36
-
10-09-12 02:19 PM #37
Pick came from approx $150,000 worth of posters bankrolls
-
10-09-12 02:22 PM #38
Originally Posted by sweep
Thought you were using east coast slang there Gater....Oak 6-7 Det
Thats how we used to give the lines out. Damm, haven't heard that in years.
-
10-09-12 02:24 PM #39
Originally Posted by jjgold
So what you're saying is this is mathdotcums comeback play. We all know how sharp that guy is.
-
10-09-12 02:26 PM #40
Coach, I'll POUND it.
-
10-09-12 02:30 PM #41
Originally Posted by BIGDAY
Coach, I'll POUND it.
-
10-09-12 02:31 PM #42
Originally Posted by ngates815
-
10-09-12 02:42 PM #43
'ex-posters' i.e. fishhead and Mathdotcom, maybe air lemart too.
of course in name only since we all know these guys have ghosts upon ghosts, so 'ex-poster' is probably a misnomer.
-
10-09-12 03:22 PM #44
Big Bankrolls usually equate to sharps
thats all I am saying
-
10-09-12 03:24 PM #45
sharps played reds -139
-
10-09-12 05:20 PM #46
Originally Posted by Okiejoe
LMAO just stop, you are really clueless.
Why would any so called sharp take a game -139 that OPENED -137? And it even got to -135 at a few places.
I know youre just a ghost of some loser who lost a "I will quit' bet but this persona isnt fairing any better.
100 posts most of them trolling people or being a complete douche, the few others basically showing you dont have a real clue as to anything that you claim is important. Namely odds, and line moves. You post up horrible numbers claiming sharps were on them, then they end up moving the opposite way which most definitely shows no big money was going that direction.
Only positive is this name has existed for 6 weeks so it wont belong until you need to make up another name to keep posting here.
-
10-09-12 05:23 PM #47
Originally Posted by jjgold
Maybe sharps in life...that doesn't roll over into gambling.
That's what I'm saying.
-
10-09-12 05:48 PM #48
If you do not beat closer you cannot win at sportsbetting
mathematically provenNomination(s):This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: DudleyDawson
-
10-09-12 06:00 PM #49
Brock does. Originally Posted by jjgold
Nomination(s):This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: Louisvillekid1
-
10-09-12 06:05 PM #50
stop talking stupid. I am probably the ony guy who can tarck opener, closers, and best available and I can tell that is total bullshit. Originally Posted by jjgold
Nomination(s):This post was nominated 1 time . To view the nominated thread please click here. People who nominated: acl123
-
10-09-12 06:08 PM #51
Wanty I have info on this game from ex sbr sharps
Of course the game can lose
All I do is relay shit to SBR Players
I am like a beard in so many words or a middle man
-
10-09-12 06:08 PM #52
Well it wouldn't be that hard, given the line is currently -131/-132. Originally Posted by jjgold
-
10-09-12 06:08 PM #53
I thought if you do not pick winners you cannot win at sportsbetting. Originally Posted by jjgold
I can beat the closing price every night...but I still have to be on the right side. You do know there is 2 closing lines that you can beat....
Please show me where the research is done that the only thing that matters is beating the closing line.
-
10-09-12 06:15 PM #54
Nicky Santoro the sharpest man ever at sbr said that
He said long term if you do not beat closers 100% you lose
If I bet Giants on a regular basis 1 point against me vs closer how do you win?????????
-
10-09-12 06:17 PM #55
You can beat Pinny's closing line at a rec. book 99 plays out of 100 without doing a single second of capping. Originally Posted by ngates815
-
10-09-12 06:36 PM #56
-
10-09-12 07:09 PM #57
Its always predicated that yu have to beat the 'sharp' closing number. Meaning whatever way the line moves the most. Which is as I said total bullshit. Originally Posted by ngates815
This whole beating the closing number is just another tout pitch to make people think they have some quick and easy way to win.
I showed you all that there have only been 147 individual games out of about 4500 where even getting the BEST number mattered, that isnt even the closing number. But of those 147 games there were more than a few where both sides won. But it still didnt change the number of games just the number of sides.
So it goes both ways.
The closer isnt the best number 85% of the time so always claiming you need to beat the closer is just retarded based on that fact alone.
-
10-09-12 07:37 PM #58
Last Friday jj wins top sportsbook and top casino.
1439 points from sportsbook and exact same number 1439 points from casino.
-
10-09-12 10:59 PM #59
Mods delete checkerboards post now
Guys all I do is try to help
Should I release who gave me this expert pick
they had inside info
All I do is help here
-
10-09-12 11:01 PM #60
-
10-09-12 11:05 PM #61
Play won so really nobody can talk shit
-
10-10-12 08:07 AM #62
jj, sorry for confusion -- just thought it was cool from the coincidence of 2 x 1439 numerological point of view. Originally Posted by jjgold
-
10-10-12 08:28 AM #63
Checkers I got power players that report to me
-
10-10-12 08:32 AM #64
Thanks JJ !!!
Reply With Quote
