[No coincidences]

Halladay owns the Nats, and Washington never hits when Zimmermann pitches, so under seems like a good play. With that being said, the under went from 6.5 (-136) to 6.5 (+119) in a 20-minute span at Pinny early this morning without dropping to 6, where it now sits at some shops. Pinny is now at 6.5 (-107).

Thoughts?

[Nova99]

Maybe the last series is fresh on people's mind? i think all three went over, two of them were under in the 8th and then went over in the 8th and 9th inning. I still remember the last one, thinking hey it should be safe and then they doubled the score in the 9th

[HoulihansTX]

I like Philly. They hit fastball pitchers, and Zimmerman is that.

[ram749]

No Rollins no Utley no Howard = no problem Philly has plenty of offense in that lineup to destroy the up n comming nats! Halladay is gonna have to hit tonite too , good luck fellas , I'm staying away here. Of course Doc is dominant but I can't back him when he's playing without his whole team. That said Philly probably rolls.

[No coincidences]

I like Philly. They hit fastball pitchers, and Zimmerman is that.

Like I said, the Nats' bats don't show up for Zimm. I've had him on my fantasy team since day one and he hardly ever gets run support.

[antifoil]

it means the assumptions you are making about the reason the line moved are wrong. it means you are using false reasoning and not looking at the important data if you feel the line should have gone the other way.

[pacocn]

N.C. it meant exactly what you thought it meant, you should've
went against the grain and played the over 6.5. Nice read.

[No coincidences]

it means the assumptions you are making about the reason the line moved are wrong. it means you are using false reasoning and not looking at the important data if you feel the line should have gone the other way.

I had no real lean on the game, other than what Pinny was obviously saying which turned out to be true.