1. 05-13-12 09:22 PM #1
    NBAForTheWin
    NBAForTheWin's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-04-12
    Posts: 101
    Betpoints: 13

    Torres or Pujols who has been the worst buy and why. Kgo.

    Title says it all
    I think Pujols has been worse for angels then torres for chelsea.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 05-13-12 09:29 PM #2
    lunchbawks
    NB#
    lunchbawks's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-31-10
    Posts: 12,873
    Betpoints: 173

    Pujols deal for sure. It never had a chance of paying off. You need to produce hitting not get a player at his peak, he's only going to come down. Why are Halos fans even surprised? This had disaster written all over it. If it was a good move the Yankees or Red Sox would have signed him
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 05-13-12 09:52 PM #3
    SOUP
    One game at a Time.
    SOUP's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-02-09
    Posts: 1,325
    Betpoints: 1803

    Quote Originally Posted by lunchbawks View Post
    Pujols deal for sure. It never had a chance of paying off. You need to produce hitting not get a player at his peak, he's only going to come down. Why are Halos fans even surprised? This had disaster written all over it. If it was a good move the Yankees or Red Sox would have signed him
    He's not getting any younger either to add to your point.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Top
« Previous Thread | Baseball Betting | Next Thread »