[brahmabull117]

Brewers - 110 Runline against Colorado: Esmil Rogers is awful, just god awful (he's got a 7 era on the season and he's been even worse than that recently). Greinke is untouchable at home. Brewers by at least 2-4 runs



Tigers - 180 against white sox: Verlander, that's all I have to say. Dude has been ridiculously profitable all season and he has owned the white sox, who are struggling badly against detroit



Arizona - 120 against LA: Ian Kennedy has also been ridiculously profitable (arizona has won 22 of his 30 starts) and Billingsley is garbage. Kennedy is 3-0 against LA this year BTW

[pacocn]

beware of Chad at home.

[SCRAGGS]

like em.

[WvGambler]

You didn't say ridiculously profitable for Greinke.

[lakerboy]

Brewers - 110 Runline against Colorado: Esmil Rogers is awful, just god awful (he's got a 7 era on the season and he's been even worse than that recently). Greinke is untouchable at home. Brewers by at least 2-4 runs



Tigers - 180 against white sox: Verlander, that's all I have to say. Dude has been ridiculously profitable all season and he has owned the white sox, who are struggling badly against detroit



Arizona - 120 against LA: Ian Kennedy has been ridiculously profitable (arizona has won 22 of his 30 starts) and Billingsley is garbage. Kennedy is 3-0 against LA this year BTW

okay if you like brewers by 2-4 runs why not -2.5 +140? add that on.

[lurk]

Billingsley isn't garbage. He's definitely capable of shutting zona down, especially in la. I'm not saying that's gonna happen or anything but I'm going stay away from this one. I'd probably be with arizona if I did bet on it but I'm not seeing any great reason to in this game. Good luck.

[brahmabull117]

Billingsley isn't garbage. He's definitely capable of shutting zona down, especially in la. I'm not saying that's gonna happen or anything but I'm going stay away from this one. I'd probably be with arizona if I did bet on it but I'm not seeing any great reason to in this game. Good luck.

close to an even money matchup with a guy who is 11-1 his last 12 starts vs a 4 ERA pitcher is no great reason to bet????

[lurk]

close to an even money matchup with a guy who is 11-1 his last 12 starts vs a 4 ERA pitcher is no great reason to bet????

I don't think so in this case, but what do I know. Like I said if I had to bet it I'd probably go with arizona but it'd be close. I don't feel like this is a winning bet over the long run even at -120 but I've been wrong before and I guess there's absolutely no way of measuring that. I hope they win for you but it just doesn't seem like great value to me. If it was as easy as looking at win-loss record or ERA of pitchers and betting on the better numbers I like to think I'd win them all.

[brahmabull117]

I don't think so in this case, but what do I know. Like I said if I had to bet it I'd probably go with arizona but it'd be close. I don't feel like this is a winning bet over the long run even at -120 but I've been wrong before and I guess there's absolutely no way of measuring that. I hope they win for you but it just doesn't seem like great value to me. If it was as easy as looking at win-loss record or ERA of pitchers and betting on the better numbers I like to think I'd win them all.

at this point, blindly betting every arizona game, considering they are up over 25-26 units on the season, is extremely profitable...


with their ace pitcher going, it's even more so

[DDT]

like the plays

[leetreaper]

looks good

[HoulihansTX]

Brahmabull... your problem is the fact you have no imagination.

[sweethook]

looks good bull lets hit it hard

[shantystar]

BOL

[lakerboy]

gl brahma.