[NBA_Brosuf]

This is for my own information with another system play. Hard enough to pick ML winner so I'll just keep this simple. Lets see if it will yield more than 50% hits.

tues picks
tribes
sd
tx
mets
white sox
cards
yanks
pitts
kc
dodgers
oak

[WolfpackChuck]

This is useless to the community. Do you not have a piece of notebook paper to write this garbage down on?

are you going to post your grocery list next?

[NBA_Brosuf]

This is useless to the community. Do you not have a piece of notebook paper to right this garbage down on?

are you going to post your grocery list next?

Who say I'm doing this for the community?

I said I'm doing it for myself.

Why so negative? Is today a bad day for you to die or what?

LOL

[NBA_Brosuf]

This is for my own information with another system play. Hard enough to pick ML winner so I'll just keep this simple. Lets see if it will yield more than 50% hits.

tues picks
tribes loser
sd loser
tx loser
mets winner
white sox loser
cards winner
yanks winner
pitts loser <--- bitter feeling LOL
kc loser
dodgers winner
oak winner

5-6

adding filter... no play with teams who are w3 or more.

weds picks
laa
detroit
philly
balt
mets
bos
mn
brews
cards
oak
atl

[boeing power]

Maybe lines and units might help
Otherwise it's useless

[NBA_Brosuf]

Maybe lines and units might help
Otherwise it's useless

Lines and units would mean that I'm gambling but I'm not gambling. I'm doing stuff to keep track to get a better understanding of these MLB games. I'm planning to play next year if this year's result would yield some positivity.

I have 3 threads going with 3 of my hypothesis. I'm looking to see if one of them would work if any.

As for right now, picking the winner without falling to the pray of upset games in MLB is hard enough. If you can master it in picking ML at a higher percentage then you can upgrade yourself to picking RL and playing the values with odds. I need to learn how to crawl before I walk thus why I'm doing what I'm doing for my own understanding to the sport of gambling games.

Thanks for the tip brother.

[NBA_Brosuf]

5-6

adding filter... no play with teams who are w3 or more.

weds picks
laa winner
detroit loser
philly loser
balt loser
mets winner
bos winner
mn winner
brews winner
cards loser
oak winner
atl winner

12-10 54%

thurs cards
laa
boston
mil
to
atl
mn
hou

Hypothesis: When a team wins, they will continue to win. When a team lose, why bet on a losing team? Once they get up to W3, the rollarcoster must drag them down to earth so no play if they are on a super winning streak. W1 probably has a higher chances of becoming w2. with W2 teams, maybe they have the will power to become a 3peat but that is asking too much already. Let the game continues....

[NBA_Brosuf]

12-10 54%

thurs cards
laa winner
boston loser
mil winner
to winner
atl loser
mn loser
hou winner

Hypothesis: When a team wins, they will continue to win. When a team lose, why bet on a losing team? Once they get up to W3, the rollarcoster must drag them down to earth so no play if they are on a super winning streak. W1 probably has a higher chances of becoming w2. with W2 teams, maybe they have the will power to become a 3peat but that is asking too much already. Let the game continues....

16-13 55%

This system here is not a strong system. It just looks sloppy. blah blah to this system.

I'll have the Friday's card for this blah blah system later.

[keel44]

I can tell you I have been there and done that. It does not hold up; not at all. There are NO funky correlations like this. I have been through them all.

What does hold to be true is treating teams like stocks on the stock market: Ride a team for a while, Fade a team for a while, Leave the team alone for a while. For example, I am currently riding the Pirates for about 2 months now along with the Giants. I am fading the Orioles and Royals. Betting every game they play.

You got to know when to get off and on, but you must think in a longer term.

[NBA_Brosuf]

I can tell you I have been there and done that. It does not hold up; not at all. There are NO funky correlations like this. I have been through them all.

What does hold to be true is treating teams like stocks on the stock market: Ride a team for a while, Fade a team for a while, Leave the team alone for a while. For example, I am currently riding the Pirates for about 2 months now along with the Giants. I am fading the Orioles and Royals. Betting every game they play.

You got to know when to get off and on, but you must think in a longer term.

yes sir. I'm trying to figure out a formula, if any to try to beat the bookies and so far, most of my systems have failed, except for one though. I have my winning system in this thread here . The last 2 entries or the last 2 days worth of picks are from my latest system. 20-5 in the last 2 days I believe. 80%

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/baseball-h...l#post10859548

The thing with system play is that it robs you of your own bias so I put everything asides and do what it says for me to do. What I need is a proven system that can pick them underdogs to win. The challenge is there. Sure anybody can pick fav laying -200 but to pick dogs at +200, now we're talking. I'm not there yet but I'm onto something something in that link I posted above.

With this system to this thread here, it is not consistence but hey, that's gambling. Some days you have a run and other days, you skunk. I guess you have to say that the train needs to go the distance before you can get a fully understanding of such train. I'm riding her for a few more session although, I'm not liking this system at all. I like the other one much much better.

For Friday

ML

pitts
laa
kc
sf
fl
cws

small cards since them other teams are even with w-w or l-l last previous games or like the mets, they are running on their fourth consecutive wins so no play for them due to such filtration.

Go go gadget, give me some good luck.

[keel44]

Did you know since June 1st, The Red Sox and Phillies won on the same day 19 times. That bet would lose 22 times. That is good considering you would be getting +odds just about every time. Even if both teams that day are -200 you would be getting +125 odds. (19 x 125 = 2375) - (22 x 100 = 2200) = $175 profit. Believe me there were many times that payout would have been MUCH more.

If you don't like the 2 team parlay method, try another slight chase variation.